"
alcovitch wrote:
Well there's your problem. Why would you want to play Diablo 3 in single player mode? There is no such thing as single player mode in Diablo 3.
All your points are relevant to PoE. How does not paying 60$ make any of your issues any less an issue?
You're telling me because you didn't pay for PoE that you wouldn't care about server maintenance or your HC character you spent weeks playing die randomly to a server hiccup?
And about Blizzard going out of business as some kind of valid point... lol. It's far more likely that GGG would go belly up long before Blizzard ever would. Blizzard is an established company with a track record of releasing the most anticipated titles on PC ever & breaking sales records in the process. GGG has yet to prove themselves. They may come out a winner and stick around, or they could disappear in a years time from now. Time will tell.
But at least he doesn't pay $60 to have bad service.
|
Posted byxxnoob#7582on May 2, 2012, 5:04:42 PM
|
"
xxnoob wrote:
"
alcovitch wrote:
Well there's your problem. Why would you want to play Diablo 3 in single player mode? There is no such thing as single player mode in Diablo 3.
All your points are relevant to PoE. How does not paying 60$ make any of your issues any less an issue?
You're telling me because you didn't pay for PoE that you wouldn't care about server maintenance or your HC character you spent weeks playing die randomly to a server hiccup?
And about Blizzard going out of business as some kind of valid point... lol. It's far more likely that GGG would go belly up long before Blizzard ever would. Blizzard is an established company with a track record of releasing the most anticipated titles on PC ever & breaking sales records in the process. GGG has yet to prove themselves. They may come out a winner and stick around, or they could disappear in a years time from now. Time will tell.
But at least he doesn't pay $60 to have bad service.
I don't follow.
It's acceptable to have bad service just because it's free?
And who says Diablo 3 will have bad service?
“God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now I'm so far behind that I will never die.”
|
Posted byalcovitch#4778on May 2, 2012, 5:08:33 PM
|
"
alcovitch wrote:
"
xxnoob wrote:
"
alcovitch wrote:
Well there's your problem. Why would you want to play Diablo 3 in single player mode? There is no such thing as single player mode in Diablo 3.
All your points are relevant to PoE. How does not paying 60$ make any of your issues any less an issue?
You're telling me because you didn't pay for PoE that you wouldn't care about server maintenance or your HC character you spent weeks playing die randomly to a server hiccup?
And about Blizzard going out of business as some kind of valid point... lol. It's far more likely that GGG would go belly up long before Blizzard ever would. Blizzard is an established company with a track record of releasing the most anticipated titles on PC ever & breaking sales records in the process. GGG has yet to prove themselves. They may come out a winner and stick around, or they could disappear in a years time from now. Time will tell.
But at least he doesn't pay $60 to have bad service.
I don't follow.
It's acceptable to have bad service just because it's free?
And who says Diablo 3 will have bad service?
Always online single player is bad service to me, when I have to pay $60 to play it. Diablo 3 was designed around the RMAH concept and thus it will suck.
|
Posted byxxnoob#7582on May 2, 2012, 5:11:53 PM
|
"
alcovitch wrote:
"
xxnoob wrote:
"
alcovitch wrote:
Well there's your problem. Why would you want to play Diablo 3 in single player mode? There is no such thing as single player mode in Diablo 3.
All your points are relevant to PoE. How does not paying 60$ make any of your issues any less an issue?
You're telling me because you didn't pay for PoE that you wouldn't care about server maintenance or your HC character you spent weeks playing die randomly to a server hiccup?
And about Blizzard going out of business as some kind of valid point... lol. It's far more likely that GGG would go belly up long before Blizzard ever would. Blizzard is an established company with a track record of releasing the most anticipated titles on PC ever & breaking sales records in the process. GGG has yet to prove themselves. They may come out a winner and stick around, or they could disappear in a years time from now. Time will tell.
But at least he doesn't pay $60 to have bad service.
I don't follow.
It's acceptable to have bad service just because it's free?
And who says Diablo 3 will have bad service?
You are missing the point.
The point is D3 = 60$. No PVP, no Single Player Modes.
POE = F2P , PVP , no single player modes
One is free, one is 60$ and bad hehe
Last edited by thepmrc#0256 on May 2, 2012, 5:12:49 PM
|
Posted bythepmrc#0256on May 2, 2012, 5:11:54 PM
|
"
xxnoob wrote:
Always online single player is bad service to me, when I have to pay $60 to play it. Diablo 3 was designed around the RMAH concept and thus it will suck.
Well lets correct your failed logic.
Stop referring to Diablo 3 as a single player game and it may help your perceptions.
Diablo 3 was NEVER meant to be a single player game. Blizzard has always considered the Diablo series a CO OP experience before everything else.
Diablo 3 was not designed around the RMAH. Please stop using false perceptions as facts to make your point.
“God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now I'm so far behind that I will never die.”
|
Posted byalcovitch#4778on May 2, 2012, 5:16:14 PM
|
"
alcovitch wrote:
"
xxnoob wrote:
Always online single player is bad service to me, when I have to pay $60 to play it. Diablo 3 was designed around the RMAH concept and thus it will suck.
Well lets correct your failed logic.
Stop referring to Diablo 3 as a single player game and it may help your perceptions.
Diablo 3 was NEVER meant to be a single player game. Blizzard has always considered the Diablo series a CO OP experience before everything else.
Diablo 3 was not designed around the RMAH. Please stop using false perceptions as facts to make your point.
I know it was never meant to be true single player, hence it being designed around the RMAH.
|
Posted byxxnoob#7582on May 2, 2012, 5:17:48 PM
|
"
alcovitch wrote:
"
xxnoob wrote:
Always online single player is bad service to me, when I have to pay $60 to play it. Diablo 3 was designed around the RMAH concept and thus it will suck.
Well lets correct your failed logic.
Stop referring to Diablo 3 as a single player game and it may help your perceptions.
Diablo 3 was NEVER meant to be a single player game. Blizzard has always considered the Diablo series a CO OP experience before everything else.
Diablo 3 was not designed around the RMAH. Please stop using false perceptions as facts to make your point.
Considering it is launching without any pvp elements it may as well be single player. Also, considering Blizzard's prime objective is to make money I believe it safe to assume that the RMAH was a huge design aspect of the game.
Last edited by thepmrc#0256 on May 2, 2012, 5:18:26 PM
|
Posted bythepmrc#0256on May 2, 2012, 5:17:50 PM
|
"
thepmrc wrote:
You are missing the point.
The point is D3 = 60$. No PVP, no Single Player Modes.
POE = F2P , PVP , no single player modes
One is free, one is 60$ and bad hehe
Why are people going "No PVP" as if it's a cut feature that will not be released shortly after launch?
Instead of releasing a half assed pvp mode, they decided to work on it a bit longer and not delay the release of what is a PvE centred game. This makes sense. There will be PvP in Diablo 3.
I'm not even sure why the $60 is even an issue. Blizzard has never went the F2P model. Everyone knew Diablo 3 would have a retail price tag of $60.
“God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now I'm so far behind that I will never die.”
|
Posted byalcovitch#4778on May 2, 2012, 5:19:08 PM
|
The bias is once again strong on this forum.
''Stand amongst the ashes of a trillion dead souls and ask the ghosts if honor matters.
The silence is your answer.''
IGN: Vaeralyse
|
Posted byTagek#6585on May 2, 2012, 5:20:03 PM
|
"
xxnoob wrote:
"
alcovitch wrote:
"
xxnoob wrote:
Always online single player is bad service to me, when I have to pay $60 to play it. Diablo 3 was designed around the RMAH concept and thus it will suck.
Well lets correct your failed logic.
Stop referring to Diablo 3 as a single player game and it may help your perceptions.
Diablo 3 was NEVER meant to be a single player game. Blizzard has always considered the Diablo series a CO OP experience before everything else.
Diablo 3 was not designed around the RMAH. Please stop using false perceptions as facts to make your point.
I know it was never meant to be true single player, hence it being designed around the RMAH.
That actually makes no sense.
“God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now I'm so far behind that I will never die.”
|
Posted byalcovitch#4778on May 2, 2012, 5:20:03 PM
|