CI and stun

"

raz0r_boy wrote:

"

SpecialSnowflake wrote:

"

raz0r_boy wrote:

Well maybe you should have read up on it BEFORE taking CI, and then blaming the devs for your own mistakes? ever thought of that?
There's a reason i keep the mechanics-thread in my sig..more people should read it.

Im sorry i thought im in the "beta feedback" section.

Anyway this is something that in my opinion needs to be changed. Im not asking for a CI buff, im gonna spend an other 20 regrets to go back to es+life but this mechanic is just bad. Really bad.

Well if you're asking for the CI mechanics to be changed to making it harder for you to get stunned/chilled (they're not even based on CI but for the ease of comperhension) then you ARE asking for a buff.
What people don't seem to understand is that CI does NOT need a buff, if it would to get a buff, it would be FAR superior to life in every way possible..and that's nog something that's either likely TO happen or should happen.
There are downsides with CI and there are benefits..for those who take the time to read up on it and understand how to counter the mechanics in a way that benefits them, the rewards are there..but as stated above, there ARE downsides.
If you can't handle CI, simply don't use it.

"

raz0r_boy wrote:

"

boohead wrote:

i want to go CI but how much does Eye of Chulula cost?

less than one exalt easy

"

SpecialSnowflake wrote:

We got an OP passive that is balanced by a horribly designed mechanic that makes no sense.
They can nerf CI and fix the stun issue.

"

raz0r_boy wrote:

"

SpecialSnowflake wrote:

We got an OP passive that is balanced by a horribly designed mechanic that makes no sense.
They can nerf CI and fix the stun issue.

Use the right passive/gear and there's no issue, that's the point.

"

SpecialSnowflake wrote:

"

raz0r_boy wrote:

"

SpecialSnowflake wrote:

We got an OP passive that is balanced by a horribly designed mechanic that makes no sense.
They can nerf CI and fix the stun issue.

Use the right passive/gear and there's no issue, that's the point.

If you think being forced to get life nodes next to a "max life is 1" node is good design then we got nothing to talk about anymore.

"

raz0r_boy wrote:

Unwavering stance or

, there, fixed it for ya.

Oh and then there's

and Fairgraves if you don't like the shock..

"

SpecialSnowflake wrote:

"

raz0r_boy wrote:

Unwavering stance or

, there, fixed it for ya.

Oh and then there's

and Fairgraves if you don't like the shock..

replace "life nodes" with "a specific unique amulet" in my last sentence and my point is still valid. But i guess u have already decided not to listen to reason in this matter.

"

raz0r_boy wrote:

Actually it isn't, because you wanted a way to break the mechanics, and i have you one for each..it does however not fit with the fact that you're not ready to sacrifice either passive points or gearslots to make the mechanics work in your favor to use CI...

"

VictorDoom wrote:

"

maryn wrote:

"

VictorDoom wrote:

use eye of chayula or get unwavering stance, problem solved, its how i used to deal with stuns on CI, just get the unqiue amulet and youre set.

gtfo pls

oh someones touchy :)

played enough CI to know the problems with it, its annoying yeah, but you can deal with it, dispel frozen flasks for the freezing, chayula or US for stunning, running like a bitch for shocking, standing still for puncture.