"
diablofdb wrote:
way too many of us have the Izaro Avatar... let's make ourselves a promise in 3.0.0 let's try to pick up different shit so my brain does not get confused anymore.
True. Im down lol
Don't forget to drink your milk 👌
|
Posted byTheWretch#7848on Apr 13, 2017, 5:28:20 PM
|
"
Pwnzors87 wrote:
Such glorious ironie, in just 4 sentences. I don´t know were to start, just hopeless.
Is there a safe space for that?
Don't forget to drink your milk 👌
|
Posted byTheWretch#7848on Apr 13, 2017, 5:29:32 PM
|
"
TheWretch wrote:
Yes, civilians get killed in wars. It's a sad reality. You try to minimize that. You don't shy away from defending yourself because of it. Tired of Jihadis blowing themselves up on innocents.
"
TheWretch wrote:
Sorry, i disagree. We tried being nice. We pumped BILLIONS into the area over the years. Enough. MOAB time.
The speed in which you went from "You try to minimize that" to "MOAB TIME!!" must be some sort of new record, for real.
|
Posted bysoneka101#4659on Apr 13, 2017, 5:30:55 PM
|
"
soneka101 wrote:
"
TheWretch wrote:
Yes, civilians get killed in wars. It's a sad reality. You try to minimize that. You don't shy away from defending yourself because of it. Tired of Jihadis blowing themselves up on innocents.
"
TheWretch wrote:
Sorry, i disagree. We tried being nice. We pumped BILLIONS into the area over the years. Enough. MOAB time.
The speed in which you went from "You try to minimize that" to "MOAB TIME!!" must be some sort of new record, for real.
The MOAB hit bunkers built into a mountain, i'm sure there was a ton of civies in there. Queue eyeroll.
"
Officials said the target was an ISIS cave and tunnel complex and personnel in the Achin district of the Nangarhar province.
"The United States takes the fight against ISIS very seriously and in order to defeat the group we must deny them operational space, which we did," White House press secretary Sean Spicer said later Thursday. The strike "targeted a system of tunnels and cave that ISIS fighters use to move around freely."
Even the fake news says so. Cry me a fkn river. But screw the details, "Stop killing the innocents!" makes for a better bumper sticker
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/
Don't forget to drink your milk 👌 Last edited by TheWretch#7848 on Apr 13, 2017, 5:36:22 PM
|
Posted byTheWretch#7848on Apr 13, 2017, 5:33:24 PM
|
"
TheWretch wrote:
The MOAB hit bunkers built into a mountain, i'm sure there was a ton of civies in there. Queue eyeroll.
"
Officials said the target was an ISIS cave and tunnel complex and personnel in the Achin district of the Nangarhar province.
"The United States takes the fight against ISIS very seriously and in order to defeat the group we must deny them operational space, which we did," White House press secretary Sean Spicer said later Thursday. The strike "targeted a system of tunnels and cave that ISIS fighters use to move around freely."
Even the fake news says so. Cry me a fkn river.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/
You didn't get the point, cheering for a huge bomb makes you look like you aren't trying to minimize anything.
And I don't know about you, but if I was a terrorist leader or something like that, and I knew that the enemy had some huge bombs in their hands, I would have a good amount of civilians on my bases as a means to not get bombed, you know, hostages. But we will never know if they had any civilians on that base, since it seems the bodies got all vaporized.
Last edited by soneka101#4659 on Apr 13, 2017, 5:48:11 PM
|
Posted bysoneka101#4659on Apr 13, 2017, 5:47:12 PM
|
|
Having hostages like that is a very good way to lose local support (and even troop support). So, they generally don't. Also, it's been shown that it just doesn't work.
Build of the week #9 - Breaking your face with style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_EcQDOUN9Y
IGN: Poltun
|
Posted byfaerwin#5850on Apr 13, 2017, 5:49:10 PMAlpha Member
|
"
faerwin wrote:
Having hostages like that is a very good way to lose local support (and even troop support). So, they generally don't. Also, it's been shown that it just doesn't work.
Sauce? And when I mean hostages I don't mean people bound in chains, if they coerce some families into living within their bases we can count that people as a hostages no?
I insist in asking that because that is the only way I can think they can avoid getting bombed to the ground. Terrorists don't have the technology to hold off a US strike right?
|
Posted bysoneka101#4659on Apr 13, 2017, 6:13:07 PM
|
"
soneka101 wrote:
"
faerwin wrote:
Having hostages like that is a very good way to lose local support (and even troop support). So, they generally don't. Also, it's been shown that it just doesn't work.
Sauce? And when I mean hostages I don't mean people bound in chains, if they coerce some families into living within their bases we can count that people as a hostages no?
I insist in asking that because that is the only way I can think they can avoid getting bombed to the ground. Terrorists don't have the technology to hold off a US strike right?
Just look at palestine when they would set up "bases" in local areas with civilians to try to prevent retaliatory strikes.
It didn't work when hussein was hiding under schools.
It just doesn't work.
The reason they don't get bombed to the ground is that bombs aren't super effective against deep bunkers. Also, they don't know their exact locations, so it becomes extremely expensive to bomb a place that might not even crumble.
Also, they tend to have multiple bases rather than a single one so that even if one place is destroyed, it keeps going on. They essentially make it too expensive to be wiped out.
Build of the week #9 - Breaking your face with style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_EcQDOUN9Y
IGN: Poltun
Last edited by faerwin#5850 on Apr 13, 2017, 6:20:28 PM
|
Posted byfaerwin#5850on Apr 13, 2017, 6:17:52 PMAlpha Member
|
"
faerwin wrote:
Just look at palestine when they would set up "bases" in local areas with civilians to try to prevent retaliatory strikes.
It didn't work when hussein was hiding under schools.
It just doesn't work.
The reason they don't get bombed to the ground is that bombs aren't super effective against deep bunkers. Also, they don't know their exact locations, so it becomes extremely expensive to bomb a place that might not even crumble.
Also, they tend to have multiple bases rather than a single one so that even if one place is destroyed, it keeps going on. They essentially make it too expensive to be wiped out.
That was informative, thanks for explaining ;)
|
Posted bysoneka101#4659on Apr 13, 2017, 6:56:05 PM
|
"
soneka101 wrote:
"
faerwin wrote:
Just look at palestine when they would set up "bases" in local areas with civilians to try to prevent retaliatory strikes.
It didn't work when hussein was hiding under schools.
It just doesn't work.
The reason they don't get bombed to the ground is that bombs aren't super effective against deep bunkers. Also, they don't know their exact locations, so it becomes extremely expensive to bomb a place that might not even crumble.
Also, they tend to have multiple bases rather than a single one so that even if one place is destroyed, it keeps going on. They essentially make it too expensive to be wiped out.
That was informative, thanks for explaining ;)
Im surprised someone is so intelligent and articulate here.
|
Posted byDeletedon Apr 13, 2017, 7:45:57 PM
|
