About 1000 fusing orbs later...
|
I agree with OP, 6L should be hard to get. Hell I'm Still farming alts, And been doing it all day, Just to try make my gear to 6L. If 6L was so easy to get... I wouldn't of Found this today Found it while farming for alts & Jeweller's orb
|
|
" Yes. Yes, you can. http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/08/07/how-mit-students-scammed-the-massachusetts-lottery-for-8-million/ (when the expectation is in your favor, at least.) IGN: SplitEpimorphism Last edited by syrioforel#7028 on Jan 14, 2014, 12:02:30 AM
|
|
|
+1 to op
What I don't understand is why so many people complain about 6 linking gear being near impossible when its not absolutely necessary to play through this game. On top of the fact that there are other means of having 6 linked spells ie tabula rasa or bringer of rain for 7. |
|
|
A few suggestions:
If it simply took 1000 fusings to make something that would add one link to a 5L (or less for that matter) it would not defeat the purpsoe of the making it exponentially more difficult. In fact the current exponential crafting being entirely random is ANTI RPG. A crafter couldn't have some small increased influence for fusings or modifiers? There is no control of magic is the logic here, kind of goes against the entire skill gems/tree philosophy then. Straight RNG is more like factorial math, stick with the exponentially incerasing costs dont force RNG on as well, two paths. In my vanilla through WotLK WoW days I didn't mind farming endgame for small increases in gearing, but in the end I burned out. If you want another $50 from someone like myself make it easy to want to keep playing and gearing multiple toons. |
|
" Lol? Sounds like your trying to Bribe them. I'm going to try buy something every month from the shop. Cause i want to help support this game, cause i like it alot.. I'm sure there many others out there like me. Still thinking about getting the $900 dollar supporter pack.. But gotta save for it so be while if i do deicide to get it, :-p Last edited by DragonsBIood#2218 on Jan 14, 2014, 12:35:02 AM
|
|
|
Lol at all the people saying OP "got lucky" by 6 linking after 1000 fusings.
I've only 6 linked twice (I always settle for 5L if it comes up), and both times it only took 3 fusings. Now that's "getting lucky", using around the average number isn't lucky, it's average. People who have been unlucky just lose sight of what lucky really is. Many lewt.
Much desync. Such rewarding. Wow. According to forum mods "sandwich" is considered an offensive word. Who knew? |
|
" Using the average (mean) # of fusings is actually worse than the average (median) cost. Sounds unlucky to me, then. ;) (edited for average) IGN: SplitEpimorphism Last edited by syrioforel#7028 on Jan 14, 2014, 12:47:33 AM
|
|
|
Okay why do people complain about the RNG of getting a 6 link.
It's RNG, stop stating the obvious that some people get lucky or some people don't lucky. To change the system there is only 2 methods. 1. Make it less punishing when you try to 6 link (your 5 link doesn't break, and only tries to roll for 6) 2. Make it not RNG RNG isn't suppose to be "fair" it's suppose to be RNG, holy shit. Last edited by RagnarokChu#4426 on Jan 14, 2014, 1:34:53 AM
|
|
" RNG is fair. (Though, not in the "everything has equal chance" definition of fair.) IGN: SplitEpimorphism
|
|
|
I don't find gambling fun. Therefore I don't find the "crafting" system fun. Attempting to slog through the "crafting" system killed my enjoyment of the game so I no longer play. "Hard" or "easy" has nothing to do with it, save for the fact that if it was "easy" it would have been a minor nuisance instead of an insurmountable source of frustration.
If I return in a future league, any currency I acquire will be traded away for items of actual value to me instead of thrown down GGG's slot machine. |
|
