"
Sikab wrote:
Yep you don't. Then it's working as intended. Now get over it o_0 You keep repeating yourself.
"not fair", "not very good", "not clever".
Yes they are not. And? It's a company. Live with it or get lost.
Ah okay then, so at least you agree as much that GGG's pricing scheme is exploitative, unethical and unfair. Then there is no point of conflict. I hope GGG adapts a more respectable pricing scheme in the future.
|
Posted byheisenbergman#5326on Jan 23, 2013, 11:23:36 PM
|
"
zat0x91 wrote:
"
Sikab wrote:
Yep you don't. Then it's working as intended. Now get over it o_0 You keep repeating yourself.
"not fair", "not very good", "not clever".
Yes they are not. And? It's a company. Live with it or get lost.
I hope people don't complain when the cash shop doesn't generate enough revenue.
Every major F2P game around who only sell cosmetics takes a risk. Luckily selling only cosmetics attracts a large crowd who likes shiny stuff and have some spare cash to support their loved game.
Don't think GGG will have funding problems.
|
Posted bySikab#4085on Jan 23, 2013, 11:23:57 PM
|
"
PathofExileVideo wrote:
"
Sikab wrote:
.
.
.
.
not to mention checking your post history, you are either a girl, or just a boy wos really feminine. quite an attitude you have for complaining 24/7.
Ya I'm just going to report your predujice... you have done nothing except troll for the attention that you so desperatly desire.
He's that guy in line behind you at the taco stand when you take back your taco because something was wrong with it. He'd be raging that you should be grateful for just having a taco.
It's late, my analogies are getting worse.
|
Posted byfolderpirate#0229on Jan 23, 2013, 11:24:18 PM
|
"
heisenbergman wrote:
"
Sikab wrote:
Yep you don't. Then it's working as intended. Now get over it o_0 You keep repeating yourself.
"not fair", "not very good", "not clever".
Yes they are not. And? It's a company. Live with it or get lost.
Ah okay then, so at least you agree as much that GGG's pricing scheme is exploitative, unethical and unfair. Then there is no point of conflict. I hope GGG adapts a more respectable pricing scheme in the future.
I didn't said i agree on being "unethical", otherwise i would have included it in my list of "agreed on".
|
Posted bySikab#4085on Jan 23, 2013, 11:25:35 PM
|
"
Sikab wrote:
"
zat0x91 wrote:
"
Sikab wrote:
Yep you don't. Then it's working as intended. Now get over it o_0 You keep repeating yourself.
"not fair", "not very good", "not clever".
Yes they are not. And? It's a company. Live with it or get lost.
I hope people don't complain when the cash shop doesn't generate enough revenue.
Every major F2P game around who only sell cosmetics takes a risk. Luckily selling only cosmetics attracts a large crowd who likes shiny stuff and have some spare cash to support their loved game.
Don't think GGG will have funding problems.
If your business model is set up in such a way that it discourages customers from giving you money they want to, then you're doing something very very wrong.
|
Posted byfolderpirate#0229on Jan 23, 2013, 11:26:06 PM
|
"
folderpirate wrote:
"
PathofExileVideo wrote:
"
Sikab wrote:
.
.
.
.
not to mention checking your post history, you are either a girl, or just a boy wos really feminine. quite an attitude you have for complaining 24/7.
Ya I'm just going to report your predujice... you have done nothing except troll for the attention that you so desperatly desire.
He's that guy in line behind you at the taco stand when you take back your taco because something was wrong with it. He'd be raging that you should be grateful for just having a taco.
It's late, my analogies are getting worse.
I actually fully agree with you. They took a bite out of my taco, Sikab wants me to just deal with that bite being gone. I want a new taco.
|
Posted byClarynaa#2856on Jan 23, 2013, 11:26:11 PM
|
"
Kujar3 wrote:
You know what? I don't really care personaly.
I want them to make more money and yes it may be a bit silly to give you what 46 points for 5 dollars? I expected 1 dollar = 10 points no matter what like it was with the supporter packs. But really, what is 20 dollars, for someone that can be alot I get that and you can't really buy anything for the price of 5 dollars now, but all of that is JUST cosmetic. Do we really have to complain about prices of cosmetic items for games? It's not anything that you can't play without.
I am going to support GGG untill the day I die. This game is something I was looking for. I played alot Diablo 2 and this game brings the feelings I had with Diablo 2. The last thing I would care about are cosmetic items right now really.
Enjoy the gameplay and if you disagree with the pricing than don't buy anything, don't support GGG it's your free will to do that.
The pricing is odd but I am OK with that as long as people can't buy power than go ahead and spend 50 dollars on a pet. people spent 1.000 for diamond kiwi and some even more for more kiwis. Just save 20 dollars to get the "normal" reward for what you are paying. For a game like this you would normally have to pay like 50 and that's something to consider.
The problem is when it's all or nothing.
Suppose you have 100 points and the item you want is worth 150. Rather than spending $5 of what should be worth, you're forced to spend $10 and overspend.
I don't have to purchase it, I get it. Think about it though, I would be willing to spend $5, but instead, I won't spending any money. It's GGG's loss.
|
Posted byzat0x91#2414on Jan 23, 2013, 11:26:32 PM
|
"
Dothackking wrote:
what exactly did GGG take away from you? I'm curious.
|
Posted bySikab#4085on Jan 23, 2013, 11:27:34 PM
|
|
Why are people saying to not spend any money on GGG as a fix for this problem? Do they want GGG to fail?? We WANT TO GIVE THEM OUR MONEY! Get that through your thick skulls!
|
|
"
Sikab wrote:
"
heisenbergman wrote:
"
Sikab wrote:
Yep you don't. Then it's working as intended. Now get over it o_0 You keep repeating yourself.
"not fair", "not very good", "not clever".
Yes they are not. And? It's a company. Live with it or get lost.
Ah okay then, so at least you agree as much that GGG's pricing scheme is exploitative, unethical and unfair. Then there is no point of conflict. I hope GGG adapts a more respectable pricing scheme in the future.
I didn't said i agree on being "unethical", otherwise i would have included it in my list of "agreed on".
Yeah you pretty much agreed when you confirmed that the customer is forced to overspend for items.
|
Posted byheisenbergman#5326on Jan 23, 2013, 11:28:10 PM
|
