GGG, please remove the word supporter from future packs

I feel sorry for you guys but GGG closed this deal a year ago, ever since then they were fooling everyone into thinking that you were supporting a small indie company with those "supporter packs" they knew fully well what they were doing for the past year.

Here's the source https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12055682

"

LucasBacker wrote:

I feel sorry for you guys but GGG closed this deal a year ago, ever since then they were fooling everyone into thinking that you were supporting a small indie company with those "supporter packs" they knew fully well what they were doing for the past year.

Here's the source https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12055682

One thing I really had hoped for was that GGG offered resin statues in their highest tier packs, but now that hope is completely lost. Maybe we’ll still see these separately through Weta but it won’t be the same imho.

Id call them league bundle packs or something like that

they will now be named "morally unethical packs" eh.

when you see a wall of badges relating to the new packs ; instead of going "hey wow that's neat!" ; you'll go "ewww that guy is unethical AF!"

Not quite the same effect ;)

"Supporter" shouldn't be removed. You're still supporting GGG with these packs.

It's up to you whether you're okay with part of the overall profit going to Tencent. I for one don't really care whether my money goes to a New Zealand game company or a Chinese one.

"

teksuoPOE wrote:

they will now be named "morally unethical packs" eh.

when you see a wall of badges relating to the new packs ; instead of going "hey wow that's neat!" ; you'll go "ewww that guy is unethical AF!"

Not quite the same effect ;)

Implying people need to care about barking dogs who can only see the worst in everything.

"

ExiledToWraeclast wrote:

"

teksuoPOE wrote:

they will now be named "morally unethical packs" eh.

when you see a wall of badges relating to the new packs ; instead of going "hey wow that's neat!" ; you'll go "ewww that guy is unethical AF!"

Not quite the same effect ;)

Implying people need to care about barking dogs who can only see the worst in everything.

Implying people should only look at the present concerns and keep safe their avenues of escape.

"

LucasBacker wrote:

I feel sorry for you guys but GGG closed this deal a year ago, ever since then they were fooling everyone into thinking that you were supporting a small indie company with those "supporter packs" they knew fully well what they were doing for the past year.

Here's the source https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12055682

Fooling everyone into thinking they were a small indie company? Maybe idiots because GGG has been quite large for a long time pre-dating the whole tencent and xbox drama

Social Engineering packs?

*Tounge out of cheek for a moment, Tencent truly does represent a terrifying twist to humanity on a scale that could impact billions of lives.

Obviously Chris had choices, and the fact he went with Tencent for the additional $$$ is something he may look back on...with...well I can't speak for people's individual emotions and feelings, but this isn't a side I would want to be on historically.

Similarly I don't think Volkswagen looks back at the 1940's and 1950's fondly...