My experience in this game has been nothing but negative and harassive.

"

mkmaddage wrote:

Lol xD Overreaction, guy. I thought I was the only fool just looking for arguments instead of actual discussion.

My "over the top" reaction (wtf... read the forums if you want to see "over the top" reaction) was merely a response to the absolutely ridiculous claim that anyone who doesn't agree with you is lying and inhuman - I've seen that overreaction too much lately. I know you're a sensible human being so I know that you're only trolling when you argue that point.

Lingering tendrils of guilt... meh... get a real point. I don't rise to kids looking for fights - give me an actual, intellectual fight with the adult you and I'm ya man brah.

"

mkmaddage wrote:

It can only generate feelings of guilt if the ninja in question views the action as objectively 'wrong' in some way. Some feel - quite justifiably - that, as the mechanic allows for and actively promotes this type of gameplay, they have nothing to feel guilty about because they are simply playing the game as intended.

If you are saying that, in general, people don't like this system and it therefore generates more negative feeling than an allocated system would, I would tend to agree (though, as I have no idea of the actual stats for this, I wouldn't proclaim it as a given). But that is why I react to people saying "if you like this, you're not human / you're lying / whatever other accusations arise" - because that is an unfounded, unreasonable extrapolation; the real discussion is not whether it's right or wrong to like the system, it's whether it's right or wrong to change the system to suit what may be the majority or whether it's better to maintain the integrity of the original design goals of the game for the niche audience who like it.

"

tadl wrote:

So much QQ because of loot, fucking Item N****