Map Management Resource
|
i find that vaal orb ur map is really help, it can up map level or turn unid so a lot of quantity
Looking for friend to play with.
Im lonely :(( IGN: hello7op | |
|
Never seen this thread and never really needed the help figuring this stuff out,
but Lyralei you deserve an epic +1 for this magnificent community contribution. If i ever needed a resource like this, this would be my main "go to" source for it. Very in depth and solid combined information. Like always when i see your contributions, +1 well played. Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes
| |
|
Fantastic resource, Lyralei. My first PoE char is at level 80, and this resource has made transitioning into maps a lot smoother than it otherwise would have been. Thank you!
Do you have any advice for getting over the 69/70 hump? Since this is my first char, I don't really have the currency to spend as recommended - I can alch a good deal of my maps, but am trying to save my chaos for item purchases, so it's been pretty slow going. Without being able to reliably get my 69/70s above 70% and with good mods, am I just in for a long slow haul? Any advice for getting over that hump to the land of Having More Than One Exalted Orb? :-)
extra
I'm saving for a tabula, which costs 3ex. I have more than the equivalent of that in chaos/fusing/alch, but nobody wants a handful of change instead of just the 3ex. I'm loath to spend what I do have trying to get higher level maps, because I feel like I'll be left with neither.
I feel like I've got a catch-22, where I'd need the higher level maps to drop great currency, but I can't get there without spending the little currency I have. From what I've seen, the return on investment doesn't really pay out - my currency's been dwindling away over the last few weeks, with not enough item or currency drops to replace what I spend. The result is that I seem to be replacing my alchs with a lot of alterations and chroms. |
|
|
Finally got what I have been trying!
I might skip boss on this one.. | |
|
Was just curious if there was a concensus about the best way to maintain/grow a map pool between:
a) Transmuting and altering until pack size vs. b) Just alching (In both cases, map is chiseled to 20% with 10-15% worth of sacrifices used) Anybody know? Last edited by theUnseen on May 14, 2014, 4:00:09 AM
| |
" imo unless you're swimming in currency and can afford to throw it away, don't chisel anything below 73. http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1000307
|
|
|
So basically:
73 or above - chisel + alch + chaos. ? - 72 - alch + chaos. Any ideas or your way of doing it? I'm currently trying to have a self sustaining 72-73 map pool. I know that transmuting and altering 66-68s are more than enough. Just not sure when the alching and chaosing should start. |
|
" Well, I'm trying to maintain/grow my 76-78 pool, so just wondering what is the best way to do so in an economic manner (10c trying to roll pack size on rare maps isn't very economical:P). I guess my question is, is pack size on a transmuted map enough to sustain a map pool? | |
" What i do is I just alch 73 maps and go, regardless of what it comes out to (unless ofc its something i cant do, then throw one chaos at it). High maps I chisel to 20% (scour first if its anything unless its AMAZING mods. 4 chisels>>20 chisels). For the most part I look for either 100% or 80-90% + a pack modifier, depending on the modifier and how large. I also highly value exiles as well (two bosses sucks). I agree maintaining a pool of 76+ maps is VERY hard. I actually feel like its almost impossible without running 73/74/75 every so often http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1000307
|
|
" In regards to that this thread could help you: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/807964 No straight answer, but the most interesting preliminary finding (http://maps.skyl3lazer.com/1000-data-points-first-impressions/) is that pack size, +rares and +magics have THE EXACT SAME EFFECT on map drops. Map quantity is still the most deciding factor though, slightly more significant than the other 3. |
|
