New upcoming unique.

"
More uniques for lvling, MORE, i want things like this to make my lvling better :3, hope it drops at the beginning of the new leagues


That would be lovely, i need some new low lvl uniques to fill my stash up with.
"
"
More uniques for lvling, MORE, i want things like this to make my lvling better :3, hope it drops at the beginning of the new leagues


That would be lovely, i need some new low lvl uniques to fill my stash up with.
PICKUP ALL THE WHITES, VENDOR FOR SCROLL FRAGMENTS, BECOME RICH.
"
Charan wrote:


Absolutely! I'd love to know the rationale but consider it optional. I admire whoever it was just for doing a low level unique. Lord knows we need more of them.


Yes! Bring on the low level uniques!
wow that unique is useless wtf xD
"I'm afraid if I stop drinking the cumulative hangover will kill me" ~ Sterling Archer
IGN: Angryweasel / PopTheWeasel
Movement speed is often underestimated but in its current state the drawback is far too important. To justify it i think this item should have higher bases stats and be in the mid/high level range.
awesome more alch shards


this is some unique editor joke noone in his right mind would pay 1000$ for this

@ the race comment cool the flying goatmen can oneshot me now
https://poe-ssf.herokuapp.com/. Join the fun.
SSF HC Legacy Witch Lvl 53
Last edited by ventiman on Aug 13, 2014, 11:42:02 AM
"
ventiman wrote:
awesome more alch shards


this is some unique editor joke noone in his right mind would pay 1000$ for this

Why not? You are talking about it, aren't you!?
"Danger is like jello, there's always room for more."
http://www.twitch.tv/vejita00
Okay if your unique has shitty effects you don't need to put an penalty to it.

It reminds me of night of the veil, for having such a medicore effect it has some extreme penalty.

Also for it's large set of bad stats, the only interesting part is 40% MS (which is like what, only a little higher then the average 20-30%) for 30% physical damage penalty.

I understand if it was like 100% or something but really.
Last edited by RagnarokChu on Aug 13, 2014, 11:46:35 AM
"
Daniel_GGG wrote:
0/0 is not full mana. It's just not low mana either.


0/0 should be considered both full mana and low mana, if you're being mathematically consistent.

but i can understand why it wouldn't be desirable, because that means if you went EB you would always be on both full and low.
Last edited by Veruski on Aug 13, 2014, 11:48:35 AM
"
Daniel_GGG wrote:
0/0 is not full mana. It's just not low mana either.



Schrödinger's mana

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info