D3 ROS loot/end game better then POE

"
GeorgAnatoly wrote:
"
KenshiD wrote:
In PoE when something good drops I freak out.


So true. This is why I'll never bitch about drop rates in this game. When something does drop it feels damn good.


For most players, it is IF not WHEN.

Play PoE for 6 months to more then one year

Bitch that it sucks and another game is better.

I'm pretty sure you got your time's worth, feel free to come back if your bored of another game. If you don't come back it's okay too, I heard titanfall was pretty dope and elder scrolls online.
Rip Poe.
I'm a forum warrior, i was born to post, raised to defend my league. Now my post has been removed, chained and exiled by mods who Ban. Ban is my brother; i do not fear it. I see it in the eyes of men and beasts that i troll. It will take me to play the actual game when i am ready and i am not ready.
"
Pyrokar wrote:
Rip Poe.


Did you order these nails ? =P
"
culblade wrote:
"
GeorgAnatoly wrote:
"
KenshiD wrote:
In PoE when something good drops I freak out.


So true. This is why I'll never bitch about drop rates in this game. When something does drop it feels damn good.


For most players, it is IF not WHEN.



I love these generalizations.

"for most players"

Who are these "most" players you talk of?

Yourself? Got any hard statistics?

If not you are just complaining about your bad luck. And no one is responsible for RNG.
"
KenshiD wrote:

I love these generalizations.

"for most players"

Who are these "most" players you talk of?

Yourself? Got any hard statistics?

If not you are just complaining about your bad luck. And no one is responsible for RNG.


Most = 51%+ of the players (rounded up on first percentage).

So yes, it's definitely most of the players, you can compare it with the number of valuable items with the number of players, sure, probably impossible, but it's a clear image that "most" is a proper term.

With the game that's made around trade and the well know "carrot on a stick", there really shouldn't be a problem with what he has said.

It's not like it's an invented hot water, for each player that gets lucky, there are dozens who fall ashort.
Of course, this cannot be proven by us players, we can just talk from the experience.
I watched a video review which got me interested, I'll probably get it once the price drops.

The biggest selling points for me were
-The crafting: Choose which mods you want to reroll, after paying you can choose if you want to keep the new mod or leave it as it is. THIS COULD MAKE CRAFTING IN POE SO MUCH LESS FACEPALM. Especially for linking.
-The bosses: They actually drop loot. Every time I kill a rare in this game I'm glad if they even drop 3 items, let alone something that might be useful.

But the lack of depth in character variety turns me off. Make perfect fusion baby between PoE and RoS?
P̯̹̙̥̉̏ͦͯA̠̝̰̣̯͕͚̲̭͈̥̠͑̓̿ͦ̾ͯ̍ͅͅȚ̜̦͕̞̞̠̮͎͔͙͔̺̺͉̟̿̿̏ͬ͛͋̍ͮ̌̚H̹͕͚̟͍̘̤̱̻̬͓̬̮̫̦͖̳̹ͮͨ̒̉ͮ̿̈ͪ̇̿͆ͭ̃ͭ̃ͭ̚ ̲̫̞̤͓̳͑ͬ̾͌ͯ͐͂̿͗ͨ͋͑̍͐͗̾̄O͕̮̻͔̳̠͉͖̳͖͈̻͇͈̣̙̪͈ͨ͐̒̽ͣ̋ͅF̣͎̞̞̯̝ͦ͌̆ͥ̈͐̾ͣ̔ͮ̐̀̏ͪ̚ ̟̩͙̙̩̮̻̼ͬ͑ͥͦ͗̿E̼̭̩̜͕̱̤̭̞͖̳͍̝̤̼͓̗ͩͫ̌ͬ̊̋̄͑͗̽X͕̰̪̱̲̩̙̦͓͓̯̠̤̝̝̯̣̥̀̋̌̍̚Ȉ̖̟͔̩̝̊̿ͪͅL̺͓̻̰̀͋̅ͮͧE͔̼͚͕̮̻̟̩̪̖̫̪̦͙̎̑͆̏ͨͅ
"
tinko92 wrote:


Most = 51%+ of the players (rounded up on first percentage).

So yes, it's definitely most of the players, you can compare it with the number of valuable items with the number of players, sure, probably impossible, but it's a clear image that "most" is a proper term.

With the game that's made around trade and the well know "carrot on a stick", there really shouldn't be a problem with what he has said.

It's not like it's an invented hot water, for each player that gets lucky, there are dozens who fall ashort.
Of course, this cannot be proven by us players, we can just talk from the experience.


[Citation Needed]

I'm not sure, but you do realize that just because you say something doesn't make it true, right?


I mean sometimes it feels like you seem to think that just because you say "most players <whatever>" then that is actually true.

Well, it's not.
Closed beta member since: March 19, 2012
"
f3rret wrote:

[Citation Needed]

I'm not sure, but you do realize that just because you say something doesn't make it true, right?


I mean sometimes it feels like you seem to think that just because you say "most players <whatever>" then that is actually true.

Well, it's not.


You wouldn't ask that question if you've read what I've wrote with a decent amount of comprehension. Hint: last sentence.

"Sometimes it feels like" would imply that I use "most players" very often, which I don't.
Again, read better and prevent these kind of posts.
"
tinko92 wrote:
"
KenshiD wrote:

I love these generalizations.

"for most players"

Who are these "most" players you talk of?

Yourself? Got any hard statistics?

If not you are just complaining about your bad luck. And no one is responsible for RNG.


Most = 51%+ of the players (rounded up on first percentage).

So yes, it's definitely most of the players, you can compare it with the number of valuable items with the number of players, sure, probably impossible, but it's a clear image that "most" is a proper term.

With the game that's made around trade and the well know "carrot on a stick", there really shouldn't be a problem with what he has said.

It's not like it's an invented hot water, for each player that gets lucky, there are dozens who fall ashort.
Of course, this cannot be proven by us players, we can just talk from the experience.


First of all I was responding to someone else.
If you have any numerical statistics on the topic of "most players have bad RNG" then please share it with us.

Also note that you should incorporate the amount of playtime, magic find they use and zones they farm.

If you cannot provide this data I have no reason to believe anything you say beyond your person experience and anecdotes.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info