The REAL truth exposed!! (Brought to you by a player in top 10)

if i had a rmt site which poe business got closed down by ggg the original fud post would have been exactly my revenge.
age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill!
"
geradon wrote:
if i had a rmt site which poe business got closed down by ggg the original fud post would have been exactly my revenge.


Which would be a smart observation if not for the fact that all of the points raised by the OP are true.
"
kasub wrote:
"
mohican wrote:
>I'm an "elite"
have played only 1 build, play on Scrubcore, use RMT( on Scrubcore!)

Oh god I'm in tears.


That really doesn't negate the point of the post. You can bash all day but it's not going to change that top players resort to rmt since the game's mechanics are too limiting. It's simply not fun that high maps can't be maintained even with huge wealth.


Lazy scrubs will always resort to RMT in order to reach their goal without working for it. Happens in every game, changing the system will not make it go away. If you think otherwise you are just being delusional.
"
Ascendic wrote:
Lazy scrubs will always resort to RMT in order to reach their goal without working for it. Happens in every game, changing the system will not make it go away. If you think otherwise you are just being delusional.

Yes, those "lazy scrubs" are rarely the top ranked players in "every game." The top League players aren't the ones using hacks. The top SC players aren't using hacks. Games like those actually promote skill over chance.

Nevermind the inherent contradiction of "lazy scrub" and people who are actually dedicated enough to get into the top 10 of the ladder. You can call those people no lifers, but I doubt you can call those people lazy.
"
UnderOmerta wrote:
"
Ascendic wrote:
Lazy scrubs will always resort to RMT in order to reach their goal without working for it. Happens in every game, changing the system will not make it go away. If you think otherwise you are just being delusional.

Yes, those "lazy scrubs" are rarely the top ranked players in "every game." The top League players aren't the ones using hacks. The top SC players aren't using hacks. Games like those actually promote skill over chance.

Nevermind the inherent contradiction of "lazy scrub" and people who are actually dedicated enough to get into the top 10 of the ladder. You can call those people no lifers, but I doubt you can call those people lazy.


You're saying you cant call people who sit and cheat in video games all day lazy?

That's damn near the definition. Not only are they "no life" lazy, but they're so lazy, they have to cheat while doing it.
"
SL4Y3R wrote:
You're saying you cant call people who sit and cheat in video games all day lazy?

That's damn near the definition. Not only are they "no life" lazy, but they're so lazy, they have to cheat while doing it.

The definition of laziness is a disinclination towards activity. The people who are at the top of the ladder are clearly not disinclined towards activity. You don't accummulate billions of points of experience without going out and playing the game. A lot.

Now the fact that you need to be either uber rich, uber lucky, or an uber cheat to progress in the latter stages of the endgame is a problem, whether you want to admit it or not. At some point in the game, it basically becomes pay to play. If you don't agree with it, then we'll agree to disagree.
"
UnderOmerta wrote:
Now the fact that you need to be either uber rich, uber lucky, or an uber cheat to progress in the latter stages of the endgame is a problem, whether you want to admit it or not. At some point in the game, it basically becomes pay to play. If you don't agree with it, then we'll agree to disagree.

By 'progress', you mean 'progress at a slower rate than people who do RMT'.
"
pneuma wrote:
"
UnderOmerta wrote:
Now the fact that you need to be either uber rich, uber lucky, or an uber cheat to progress in the latter stages of the endgame is a problem, whether you want to admit it or not. At some point in the game, it basically becomes pay to play. If you don't agree with it, then we'll agree to disagree.

By 'progress', you mean 'progress at a slower rate than people who do RMT'.

If you think it's fun to progress a few percent in a day, all while you spend all your currency rolling the maps that contribute to that few percent with little return on investment, then sure. I agree with you entirely.
I wish I was cool enough to not have fun playing video games.
You've already graduated to the level of cool that is trolling on message boards.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info