To much loot after the recent patch. EDITED: Updated with streamer video on this topic.

Troll

It's not inline with POE1. POE1 campaign loot looks like a juiced map compared. Loot is still has bad as before during the campaign, it's just slighting better. I'm still doing act2 cruel and I haven't noticed anything huge beside getting a couple more valuable currency and an extra rare item or two per mission... I wouldn't call that giving too much loot.

People complaining the patch gives too much loot are just clowns who probably don't even play POE1 past the fist 5 acts on new leagues.

"

pedidestroyer#5482 wrote:

Troll

Clearly not.

is it really? maybe you should consider using your exalts instead of buying good gear with it.

but yea i somewhat agree, not the rarity buffs on rares or currency drop rates, but the screen clutter from too many bases starting to ramp up.

"

c0refreAk#2874 wrote:

is it really? maybe you should consider using your exalts instead of buying good gear with it.

but yea i somewhat agree, not the rarity buffs on rares or currency drop rates, but the screen clutter from too many bases starting to ramp up.

This is why loot filters exist, you can just hide every bad base and only show the ones with the biggest number on it.

"

Toforto#2372 wrote:

"

c0refreAk#2874 wrote:

is it really? maybe you should consider using your exalts instead of buying good gear with it.

but yea i somewhat agree, not the rarity buffs on rares or currency drop rates, but the screen clutter from too many bases starting to ramp up.

This is why loot filters exist, you can just hide every bad base and only show the ones with the biggest number on it.

Ideally a filter should not be required though. If there drops so much trash that you need to filter it out. You kinda argue that to much loot drops.

"

Anubis2108#3783 wrote:

"

Toforto#2372 wrote:

"

c0refreAk#2874 wrote:

is it really? maybe you should consider using your exalts instead of buying good gear with it.

but yea i somewhat agree, not the rarity buffs on rares or currency drop rates, but the screen clutter from too many bases starting to ramp up.

This is why loot filters exist, you can just hide every bad base and only show the ones with the biggest number on it.

Ideally a filter should not be required though. If there drops so much trash that you need to filter it out. You kinda argue that to much loot drops.

The game had filter support baked in at day 1. If they didn't want players to use or even need to use filters they didn't need to include them.

a

"

The game had filter support baked in at day 1. If they didn't want players to use or even need to use filters they didn't need to include them.

That is not what we are talking about though. We are not talking about what they want or intended. We are talking about a simple logic.

If you need to filter it out. Does to much loot drop? The answer is simply yes. There is no argument against it.

Now you can argue that you like that. That is completly subjective.

"

Anubis2108#3783 wrote:

"

Ideally a filter should not be required though. If there drops so much trash that you need to filter it out. You kinda argue that to much loot drops.

The game had filter support baked in at day 1. If they didn't want players to use or even need to use filters they didn't need to include them.

That is not what we are talking about though. We are not talking about what they want or intended. We are talking about a simple logic.

If you need to filter it out. Does to much loot drop? The answer is simply yes. There is no argument against it.

Now you can argue that you like that. That is completly subjective.[/quote]

That is exactly what we're talking about. Your opinion is we shouldn't need a filter, filters being in the game at inception showed GGG disagreed from the start. If they never planned on potentially dropping enough loot that players would need to filter it, they wouldn't include the option to filter.