Pure Breachstone exp. gain is broken must be nerfed!

"

johnce6 wrote:

And again breachstones are crazy expensive for anyone who didn't hit the powerball this season or RMT.

You are in the wrong thread to give feedback.

"

MrsDeath_ wrote:

"

johnce6 wrote:

And again breachstones are crazy expensive for anyone who didn't hit the powerball this season or RMT.

You are in the wrong thread to give feedback.

Not really. I tried farming breachstones most of the season because I had never done any (still haven't). I have enough shards I think for 3 different breachstones and then I think you have to upgrade them to pure or something? Sorry, unless someone is buying them it is not an easily acquired item and doesn't need to be nerfed. Love how this point is dodged by you guys.

"

johnce6 wrote:

"

MrsDeath_ wrote:

"

johnce6 wrote:

And again breachstones are crazy expensive for anyone who didn't hit the powerball this season or RMT.

You are in the wrong thread to give feedback.

Not really. I tried farming breachstones most of the season because I had never done any. I have enough shards I think for 3 different breachstones and then I think you have to upgrade them to pure or soemthing? Sorry unless someone is buying them it is not an easily acquired item and doesn't need to be nerfed. Love how this point is dodged by you guys.

I made 2 pure stones in the second week of my ssf playtime..
You just need to know what to invest and what syndicate members to manipulate.

Ahh so I did not use syndicate very much at all for this. I rolled breaches on maps and kind of gave up after experiencing the cost. If so then I say maybe nerf the syndicate if it is out of control to do this way, but I have not tried so can't give a real opinion on that method.

"

MrsDeath_ wrote:

"

Azarhiel wrote:

But why on hell would you want to nerf something like that ? Because 1% of top players will make their way to 100 in 5 days ?

with pure stones you can level from 80 to 96 in 4 hours.
does that sound natural?

Well, it sounds like innovation! xD

Death you are such a cucked nub. Im kidding, I agree with you entirely the pure stone xp was absolute horse shit. I don't really know how there is an argument against nerfing them.

"

John_Ra wrote:

"

MrsDeath_ wrote:

"

Azarhiel wrote:

But why on hell would you want to nerf something like that ? Because 1% of top players will make their way to 100 in 5 days ?

with pure stones you can level from 80 to 96 in 4 hours.
does that sound natural?

Well, it sounds like innovation! xD

Yep its a super taxi ^^

This taxi used to be from lvl 1 to lvl 60 in 30 mins. with delve.
Now its after maps with pure stones :D

"

johnce6 wrote:

Ahh so I did not use syndicate very much at all for this. I rolled breaches on maps and kind of gave up after experiencing the cost. If so then I say maybe nerf the syndicate if it is out of control to do this way, but I have not tried so can't give a real opinion on that method.

I appreciate your honesty.
In ssf i did not have the currency expense you ve experienced so it was easy for me. I did farm pure stones for the xoph's amulet but ended up dropping it from a normal breach. But pure stones can be good for loot dropping from both boss and rares appear while doing the pure stone.
My problem is with its exp. rate. I think its far too good and should be reconsidered.

"

theD4nk0wl wrote:

Death you are such a cucked nub. Im kidding, I agree with you entirely the pure stone xp was absolute horse shit. I don't really know how there is an argument against nerfing them.

:DD:D:D

Well popular argument against my nerf proposal was ''people dont even care about how hard it is to be 100'' which is fair enough. But my problem is not with being 100. Its about pure stones destroying the balance of levelling system in PoE. I think levelling process holds a value because its hard and with pure stones it loses that value by being too easy.
I respect that argument except personal attacks which is fairly common in this thread :D

"

johnce6 wrote:

I really don't think some more people being able to actually play end game is really hurting the game. At least End Game isn't completely devoid of players like it was for years and years.

Endgame has never been devoid of players ...

"

johnce6 wrote:

Not really. I tried farming breachstones most of the season because I had never done any (still haven't). I have enough shards I think for 3 different breachstones and then I think you have to upgrade them to pure or something? Sorry, unless someone is buying them it is not an easily acquired item and doesn't need to be nerfed. Love how this point is dodged by you guys.

Are you aware that this is a multiplayer games and what is happening is pure breachstones being run by parties ?
If you have a 6 man party and each of them have a pure breachstone, you have 6 people running 6 pure breachstones worth of xp.
You need It that fled level rank 3 in Research to get access to one ( 2 if head of the safehouse ) bench to 'purify' a breachstone.

So it might (somewhat) 'regulate itself' when the league ends, but it might still be too much, it seems really crazy.


Why haven't you run any of your breachstone by the way ? You don't want to run them because they aren't pure ? And you are not seeing the problem with this then ?

fun fact: i haven't used one all league. actually, i haven't used a single breachstone (upgraded or otherwise).

i did sell a bajillion, though.

"

johnce6 wrote:

"

MrsDeath_ wrote:

"

johnce6 wrote:

And again breachstones are crazy expensive for anyone who didn't hit the powerball this season or RMT.

You are in the wrong thread to give feedback.

Not really. I tried farming breachstones most of the season because I had never done any (still haven't). I have enough shards I think for 3 different breachstones and then I think you have to upgrade them to pure or something? Sorry, unless someone is buying them it is not an easily acquired item and doesn't need to be nerfed. Love how this point is dodged by you guys.

a lot is now making sense.



and yeah, these are clearly super OP. i can't fathom how anyone could claim otherwise, but there someone is. claiming otherwise. it's as if there are patterns here...

"

Fruz wrote:

"

johnce6 wrote:

I really don't think some more people being able to actually play end game is really hurting the game. At least End Game isn't completely devoid of players like it was for years and years.

Endgame has never been devoid of players ...

"

johnce6 wrote:

Not really. I tried farming breachstones most of the season because I had never done any (still haven't). I have enough shards I think for 3 different breachstones and then I think you have to upgrade them to pure or something? Sorry, unless someone is buying them it is not an easily acquired item and doesn't need to be nerfed. Love how this point is dodged by you guys.

Are you aware that this is a multiplayer games and what is happening is pure breachstones being run by parties ?
If you have a 6 man party and each of them have a pure breachstone, you have 6 people running 6 pure breachstones worth of xp.
You need It that fled level rank 3 in Research to get access to one ( 2 if head of the safehouse ) bench to 'purify' a breachstone.

So it might (somewhat) 'regulate itself' when the league ends, but it might still be too much, it seems really crazy.


Why haven't you run any of your breachstone by the way ? You don't want to run them because they aren't pure ? And you are not seeing the problem with this then ?

I have not run my breaches because I do not know much about them at all and I quit playing very much about 2 or 3 weeks ago. Much of the game content is new to me as this is my first league in a long time. I had read when googling about them if I remember right that you upgrade them some how to pure so I figured they weren't worth doing until I figured out how to do that.

Thanks for info on grouping. I admit being my first season back I did a lot of things very slow so I solo'd the vast majority of it. So many new maps even atlas was new to me.

"

robmafia wrote:

a lot is now making sense.



and yeah, these are clearly super OP. i can't fathom how anyone could claim otherwise, but there someone is. claiming otherwise. it's as if there are patterns here...

I had replied to Mrs. Death shortly after her informing me about the syndicate stuff that I lacked such knowledge and this may very well change my mind on the subject. I can admit when I may be wrong and also see more than one point of view. Not so sure about you /shrug