Donald Trump and US politics

"

Xavderion wrote:

4D chess continues?

Spoiler

If Trump is always golfing like this I really don't mind tbh.

Trump always agrees with the last man in the room.

He agrees with a lot of what Paul wants, they both claim progress, but he has just moved away from 10 moderates.

Wow.... I think he was serious... He did delete this tweet after all

"

soneka101 wrote:

Wow.... I think he was serious... He did delete this tweet after all

Shit that made my brain hurt. I still feel like gloating about Trump's low numbers is stupid because he was always gonna be the most divisive president ever.

"

Xavderion wrote:

"

soneka101 wrote:

Wow.... I think he was serious... He did delete this tweet after all

Shit that made my brain hurt.

I just woke up, now I'm tired again.

The Fourth Amendment? That's SO 18th Century!

"

Top Obama Adviser Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-03/top-obama-adviser-sought-names-of-trump-associates-in-intel

"

White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One."

='[.]'=

"

Raycheetah wrote:

"

White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One."

You dropped something.

"

This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.

It's funny how we went from "lol this never happened fucking conspiracy theorists lmao" to "w-well technically it probably is not against the law!". The interesting thing about this will be how anti-Trumpers react when Trump uses the exact same shitty law to spy on his 2020 campaign opponents. I predict many, many tears.

"

Xavderion wrote:

It's funny how we went from "lol this never happened fucking conspiracy theorists lmao" to "w-well technically it probably is not against the law!". The interesting thing about this will be how anti-Trumpers react when Trump uses the exact same shitty law to spy on his 2020 campaign opponents. I predict many, many tears.

Political predictions is my best, I told halfway during the election Trump would win everyone was laughing at me.


So here's my next prediction, he's going to win the next election because his oponants will still underestimate him.


and.... in 16 to 20 years, his daughter Ivanka will make the jump into politics. Right now the media are mocking her non-stop. Still, she's one of the most successful business woman in the USA. Actually she's the one in charge of Trump empire, much more in charge than her brothers. And she's already meeting tons of women in business and taking the stage on politics. She might end being the first woman president of the USA, and she will win because her oponant will underestimate her.


Quote me in 16 - 20.

"

Xavderion wrote:

It's funny how we went from "lol this never happened fucking conspiracy theorists lmao" to "w-well technically it probably is not against the law!". The interesting thing about this will be how anti-Trumpers react when Trump uses the exact same shitty law to spy on his 2020 campaign opponents. I predict many, many tears.

Did we go from there to there?


Or did we go from Trump makes an extremely serious accusation based solely on something he saw on TV to, well, to nowhere, we are still there?


Don't get me wrong, if any of it is true then hell should be released. I'm just sat here thinking, but nothing has changed.

"

diablofdb wrote:

Political predictions is my best, I told halfway during the election Trump would win everyone was laughing at me.

I called it the day he announced he was running. I know 'Muhrica. People laughed at me too. Guess we got the last laugh.

FWIW i wish we had the equivalent in Canada. I'd vote for him.