Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Fruz wrote:

FFS, don't you know what SPOILERS are in this forum ???

sorry

Thx !
It does make the page easier to read, especially on a smartphone.

"

Fruz wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Fruz wrote:

FFS, don't you know what SPOILERS are in this forum ???

sorry

Thx !
It does make the page easier to read, especially on a smartphone.

I thought I was the only one thinking that, heh.

Given the upcoming changes to the Labyrinth and the fact they apparently will no longer have trials in maps, while also making no mention of a use for Offerings of the Goddess, I proposed the following:

https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1899651

Basically, you can use Offerings to change the Labyrinth, such as adding leaguestone or other effects to increase difficulty and drops, and alternatively make it easier such as skipping straight to Izaro fights for a greatly reduced reward (essentially, just Ascendancy points). This would be a win-win for everyone as those who dislike the Lab can skip the content they hate, get their points and move on while those who enjoy it can tweak it to make it more rewarding.

Trials will still be needed for uber lab.
Surely in maps.

"

Elynole wrote:

The bias described in the initial post of this thread - as to throwing out the overly positive threads of lab, and only accounting for those players in a list that want its dismissal or changing instead of accounting for those that want to keep Lab as it is makes this amount to nothing more than a witch hunt.

While I agree with some of the threads posted based on the problems that arise with Lab, this one-sided fact gathering doesn't "prove" anything and is the wrong way to go about actually gathering evidence.

You expect people who sit around all day whining to understand what data bias is ? Hahaha.

[Removed by Support]

The title of this thread is "Over 320 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 870 posters in support". It is ridiculous to claim that the extremely few threads about Labyrinth that are not talking about labyrinth problems should be included in a list of threads that are "discussing labyrinth problems". Arguing otherwise is a silly brain dead idea and makes no sense.

If people whining that a list of threads praising labyrinth would be interesting then the people making such a complaint should get off their lazy butt and make such a list because I'm definitely not interested in doing their bidding. Such a thing would be totally useless and carry zero meaning that I could see anyway.

Edit: Including the silly claim by TFH about some nonsense data bias. Tell me TFH, what could this useless data show? I predict that you have no response because you have no logical thought, only inane blather.

Didn't you guys say many moons ago that you just wanted GGG to respond with their plans so that you could either anticipate the lab will be changed to suit you or so that you would know it won't be and you could move on with your lives? I could have sworn that's all you guys were asking for after Chris made his minority comment. Well, anyway, you now have your answer. It's not going to change in a way that will make you happy.

GGG has been slowly improving Labyrinth to make it less boring and less frustrating and less of a buggy piece of shit with each release. GGG has announced plans in 3.0 to continue that trend.

"

The_Reporter wrote:

Enjoy your vacation, tin foil hat.

Stating facts isnt going to get me a vacation buddy, but thats hilarious considering your two week ban on Christmas last time stupid shit came out of your mouth :]