ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP

"
Xavderion wrote:
30% is infinitely better than 0%, that's for sure. And yes, immigrants contribute a lot to the economy. Illegal immigrants not so much though, bigly deficit. And they're technically 100% criminal, they entered the country illegaly after all.

I also do think that the wall is mandatory. When you have hundreds of thousands of people every year trying to get across your border illegaly, you better make sure you have a border at all. No border = no country.

And just a protip, don't start with crime stats. There's a reason why Stormfront loves crime stats.


Oh dear.

Luckily, I had already posted regarding this. I'll just post it again, people ran away in horror last time back to r/The_Donald and their echo chambers.

I recommend this paper

Becerra, D., Androff, D. K., Ayon, C., & Castillo, J. T. (2012). Fear vs. facts: Examining the economic impact of undocumented immigrants in the US. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare, 39, 111.

https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3696&context=jssw#page=111

Undocumented immigrants and

Crime
Spoiler

"
Previous studies have found that violent and non-violent
crime rates among undocumented immigrants decreased
during the late-1990s and mid-2000s (Bailey & Hayes, 2006;
Butcher & Piehl, 2007; Nadler, 2008; Rumbaut & Ewing, 2007).
According to Rumbaut and Ewing (2007), even as the number
of undocumented immigrants in the United States doubled
during the late 1990s, the rates of violent and property crimes
decreased 34% and 26%, respectively. Using data from the
annual Federal Bureau of Investigation Unified Crime Reports,
Nadler (2008) compared the differences in total crime rates
between High Immigrant Jurisdictions (HIJs) (defined as the
19 states with the most resident immigrants) whose resident
populations include the highest proportion of immigrants and
highest percentage influx of immigrants, and non-HIJs in the
United States between 1999 and 2006. The study found that the
total crime rates decreased by a little more than 10% across the
nation (3808.1 per 100,000 residents in 2006 versus 4273.8 per
100,000 residents in 1999). Crime, both violent and non-violent,
decreased at a faster rate in the 19 HIJs than in the non-HIJs.
In 2006, the total crime rate in HIJs was lower than non-HIJs
(3807.1 per 100,000 residents versus 3809.4 per 100,000 residents).
Finally, the total crimes rate decreased from between
7 to 15 percent across all of the jurisdictions between 1999 and
2006. When examining the incarceration rate of undocumented
immigrants, researchers found that the rate is lower than that
for native-born citizens (Bailey & Hayes, 2006; Butcher & Piehl,
2007; Rumbaut & Ewing, 2007). Furthermore, there is evidence
that immigration does not increase crime rates and actually
reduces crime rates in urban areas (Reid, Weiss, Adelm)



Healthcare
Spoiler

"
Although there are
costs associated with health care provision to undocumented
immigrants, due to their lower rates of use of health care services,
these expenditures account for only 1.5% of U.S. medical
costs (Okie, 2007) and the estimated tax burden per household
was only $11 per year for providing health care to undocumented
immigrants (Goldman, Smith, & Sood, 2006). While
some may argue that no tax dollars should go toward providing
services to a population who many believe should not
even be in the U.S., the $11 annual per household tax burden
is not the overwhelming financial burden that the media and
many politicians claim.



Economic benefits
Spoiler

"
There are economic costs and benefits of having undocumented
immigrants and their children living in the United
States. The CBO reported that on a federal level, revenues
generated by undocumented immigrants are greater than the
expense of providing services because undocumented immigrants
do not qualify for federal programs (CBO, 2007). In
addition to the additional revenue generated through taxes,
undocumented immigrants contribute to the U.S. economy in
other ways.
The financial solvency of the Social Security and Medicare
programs in the U.S. relies on payroll tax revenue (Segal, 2010).
Despite the public discourse to the contrary, the majority of
undocumented immigrants pay income taxes through the
use of Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) or
through false Social Security numbers (National Council of La
Raza [NCLR], 2008; U.S. Chamber of Commerce, n.d.). As a
result, undocumented immigrants contribute over $7 billion
annually to Social Security and over $1.5 billion to Medicare
(NCLR, 2008).

Although some undocumented immigrants receive Social
Security and Medicare benefits, the majority do not receive
any benefits from those programs (NCLR, 2008; Sommers,
2010). Since false Social Security numbers are not appropriately
linked to an individual who can take advantage of
Social Security benefits, the majority of contributions to Social
Security from undocumented immigrants go into an earnings
suspense file. The Social Security Administration factors in the
over $7 billion annual contributions from undocumented immigrants
into the Social Security Administration's calculations
and projections for the solvency of Social Security (Porter, 2005;
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, n.d.). The retirement of the baby
boom generation will lead to increased expenditures for Social
Security (Abel, 2003) and additional tax revenue is needed to
provide Social Security benefits to current and future retirees.
Since undocumented immigrants are ineligible to receive government
services, it is estimated that undocumented immigrants
pay an average of $1,800 per household, per year more
to Social Security and Medicare than they utilize in services
(Camarota, 2004). Therefore, undocumented immigrants actually
contribute to the solvency of Social Security and Medicare
and help to provide services to current and future retirees.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
rojimboo wrote:
Nevermind the fact that immigrants to the US contribute a lot to the economy, are less criminal than native citizens, but happen to be of the wrong colour usually.

The last point being the most important, I'm sure, for some.
You know what I call someone who keeps bringing up the color of people's skin when no one was talking about it and it has nothing to do with the subject matter?


Let's not be naive here, and think it has nothing to do with the subject matter, hmmm?
"
rojimboo wrote:
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
rojimboo wrote:
Nevermind the fact that immigrants to the US contribute a lot to the economy, are less criminal than native citizens, but happen to be of the wrong colour usually.

The last point being the most important, I'm sure, for some.
You know what I call someone who keeps bringing up the color of people's skin when no one was talking about it and it has nothing to do with the subject matter?


Let's not be naive here, and think it has nothing to do with the subject matter, hmmm?


It doesn't, and if you actually lived in the southern half of the United States, you would know this. But considering this thread is like 90% non-americans being know-it-alls on everything, I digress.

Just a thread full of people from who knows where, participating in their own little echo chamber, patting each other on the back and shit-talking Americans. Really nothing to see here.

Back to GD I go.
"
Destructodave wrote:


It doesn't, and if you actually lived in the southern half of the United States, you would know this. But considering this thread is like 90% non-americans being know-it-alls on everything, I digress.

Just a thread full of people from who knows where, participating in their own little echo chamber, patting each other on the back and shit-talking Americans. Really nothing to see here.

Back to GD I go.


Sure sure.

That's why there is an murican quoting 4chan, r/The_Donald, and now Stormfront.

I'm sure he is just pretending to be a white supremacist.

After all, both sides, perpetrator and victim, are to blame.

Sure, sure.

Edit:
By the way this whole line of thinking - immigrants are scum, but not white ones - has been started by Trump.

Remember when there was a humanitarian crisis in the Caribbean? He lashed out at those 'shithole' countries and said why doesn't Murica get Norwegian immigrants?

That was comical. The Norwegians, having a much higher standard of living were like, ummmm, nope. No ty. Keep your Big Macs.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-norway/thanks-but-no-thanks-norwegians-reject-trumps-immigration-offer-idUSKBN1F11QK
Last edited by rojimboo on Jan 17, 2019, 3:07:44 AM
"
Destructodave wrote:

Just a thread full of people from who knows where, participating in their own little echo chamber, patting each other on the back and shit-talking Americans. Really nothing to see here.

Back to GD I go.


Actually, I remember we had this conversation last time, so once again I explain that most of us are shit-talking the Trump administration, not the american people.

I should hope there is still a difference.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
faerwin wrote:
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
CATEGORIES OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WALL IS EFFECTIVE AGAINST
- previously deported aliens
- immigrants who entered Mexico illegally
- human traffickers and their victims
- drug smugglers

CATEGORIES OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WALL IS NOT EFFECTIVE AGAINST
- literally every other kind of illegal migrant
Drug smugglers won't be affected. They already dig tunnels, use boats or drones to smuggles their stuff without being detected.

- "immigrants who entered mexico illegally" huh, I don't understand what you mean on that one.

- Human traffickers, it's like 50/50. Those that did it by walking through the border, sure but there's a good deal that enter through boats or trucks. Border patrol doesn't have time to inspect every trucks.


- I guess those that were already deported might be stopped, unless they simply get someone else identity to cross again. Or other ways.
I said "effective." I didn't say perfect. Where there's no wall they don't dig tunnels, they don't need to.

It's important to know that a decent chunk of immigrants from Central America (e.g. Honduras) decide to enter Mexico illegally, then make the trip to the US. For example, that famous migrant caravan overwhelmed Mexico's southern border.


They still dig tunnels "In December 2012, a tunnel 3 feet in diameter and 100 yards long, with electricity and ventilation, was found near the Nogales, Arizona, port of entry. Since 1990, there have been almost 170 tunnels found leading into Mexico, mostly in Arizona and California."

Build of the week #9 - Breaking your face with style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_EcQDOUN9Y
IGN: Poltun
the 6.5 billions is only to start the work of the wall. The estimates are around 25b for the whole thing. not counting maintenance.
Build of the week #9 - Breaking your face with style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_EcQDOUN9Y
IGN: Poltun
"
Bottom line:

Racists want "the wall"

Non-racists don't.


I wouldn't say that.

Racists want to wall for sure, but I'm willing to bet a lot of those that want it are misguided and fooled by the real effectiveness of a wall.
Build of the week #9 - Breaking your face with style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_EcQDOUN9Y
IGN: Poltun
Wasn't sure where to ask, so I'll do it here xd

Any interest in some other countries political topics?

like say

"Brexit and the EU"?

All this Trump talking leaves one exhausted.
"
rojimboo wrote:
Wasn't sure where to ask, so I'll do it here xd

Any interest in some other countries political topics?

like say

"Brexit and the EU"?

All this Trump talking leaves one exhausted.


Well ignore this thread and make a thread called something like "Euro-politiks discussion"

The problem you may have is Americans generally are not that interested in foreign politics, not nearly as much as foreigners are interested in USA politics, at least.

The British royal family being the one exception. Americans are obsessed with the British royal family, for some reason I dont quite grasp.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info