Donald Trump and US politics

"

Manocean wrote:

I used to respect this guy but yeah fuck it




Going a few page back but it's because I respect Boogie and he's a good person.

The thing with Boogie is I never know if he is joking or serious. Tweet could be either.

But, I used to watch him, defend him.. for years. Then gave up. I feel like he's a con artist. The constant sob stories for the past 5 years+. I just cant buy it anymore!

"

Manocean wrote:

The thing with Boogie is I never know if he is joking or serious. Tweet could be either.

But, I used to watch him, defend him.. for years. Then gave up. I feel like he's a con artist. The constant sob stories for the past 5 years+. I just cant buy it anymore!

Well I still think he's a good person at heart, but he definately have problems. Problems that, he has only himself to blame for and he should work this out by himself. Expecting other to pay for his problems is very entitled and narcicistic. There's also this part where, he's fucking rich, he has a youtube account, a patreon and some publicity going on for him with lootcrate and other stuff. He's basically being the 1% complaining about having not enough.

Shouldn't Boogie be making a lot of money? He has like 4m subscribers

"

soneka101 wrote:

"

Raycheetah wrote:

Google is now officially the Ministry of Truth:

"

Google Redefines “Fascism”, 1613

"

First Merriam-Webster:
Fascism: “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.”
The secondary definition is: “a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control.”

Ok, now go google the word Fascism. Here’s what you will see:
fas·cism ˈfaSHˌizəm/ noun an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5Rp36V-i3E

I checked it out myself, and, yep, this is real. ='[.]'=

Maybe that is related to this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgEPHIaScck

I know that some people on this forum don't like vox, but there it explains how that tool that gives you a featured answer works, and why sometimes it shows bullshit.

You may suspect that google is smearing right wing people, and although it might be a possibility, there is no evidence that someone did it on purpose, right? Until such evidence comes up I think we can just assume that the tool messed up, as it did before.

Because your assumption suits you better? It's the Google definition, not simply a web result. At any rate, it both:

A. Matches Google's recent socio-political bias

and

B. Hasn't been corrected, even though it's now a "thing."

You go ahead and assume what you like. As far as I'm concerned, Google (in violation of the corporate motto which they abandoned a few years ago) is being evil. =9[.]9=

"

diablofdb wrote:

So what you says is.... (1)I can't critic your political party(1) because (2)you feel offended when your opinions are challenged(2), but you think it's ok to make generalization against an entire race. OK

Oh my god dude, how the hell did you reach that conclusion? Just quote me next time the parts that make you think I said any of that, and I will show you that I didn't.

First, you can criticize them, and they are not 'my political party', but if you do criticize them and say "they all do that!", that is generalization. You can do it, as I said I'm just a dude on the internet, I can't impose rules on you. But if you generalize about them, then later criticizes someone for generalizing, then that is hypocrisy, you can be a hypocrite if you want to, just don't ask us to pretend you aren't.

Second, where I was offended? What did I write that made you think I'm offended? I'm just chatting with you bro, chill out... Geez...

Third, what you talking about? Which generalization do I think it's okay to make about a race? That they aren't as discriminated as other groups? That is not a generalization, I'm not saying that "they all do something", or that "they all think that way", so it's not a generalization. I will give you examples to make it easier to understand:

"White people are the biggest consumers of pineapple pizza" That is not a generalization (maybe slander(that is a joke)).

"White people (implies all of them) love pineapple pizza" That is a generalization.

"White people are the biggest consumers of pineapple pizza, that is why they are unreliable when it comes to ordering pizza for a gathering" I don't know what I should call this, but I don't think it's something cool. Maybe discrimination is the word idk.

"

diablofdb wrote:

You're not having a discussion with me you just writing a wall of text void of any meaning.

Just because you didn't understand I doesn't mean there is no meaning in what I wrote. And that was a wall of text? You want me to answer you with one or two sentences or else you are not able to keep up? If what I write is too hard for just give up man, don't blame me for your shortcomings.

"

diablofdb wrote:

you're literally avoiding any conversation and refuse any sort of critic.

I am avoiding conversation by writing too much? You talked to her, and I came talking to you just so I could "avoid conversation by writing walls of text"? You got me man, I was doing that all along, In fact I could write something like "AUISHDAUSH...", but I decided to try to spell things correctly and make proper sentences just to piss you off.

"

diablofdb wrote:

Somehow you compare, me disagreeing with a political group and Sarah making an extremly racist comment generalizing an entire population based on their race. OK

That is what you understood, right? And here I thought that my point was that "Democrats" and "White people" are both groups of people that are categorized differently (one by race, and other by political affiliation), and that generalizing against one, is no better than generalizing against the other. If you do think that this statement is wrong, please, tell me why, and where is wrong. I want to know the logic behind it.

"

diablofdb wrote:

And you could be surprised about the amount of discrimination white suffer. There are literally entire hood where we can't go because people there would use violence against use purely based on the color of our skin.

Just read what I wrote before:

"

I didn't even make an affirmation that they "don't suffer the same amount", although I don't believe they suffer the same amount, if anyone can prove it I'm open to acknowledge that statement.

"

diablofdb wrote:

Stop playing the "I'm more discriminated therefore I'm more important" or playing the classic white guilt card. I'm not buying into this.

Where did I say something like that again? Never said anyone was more important for being discriminated more and this isn't even about "white guilt", the image was about republicans and democrats perception about discrimination. There are white democrats that also don't think white and christians aren't discriminated the same amount than black people and muslims.

---------

About Boogie, I don't know what kind of person he is, but if his parents did to him what he said they did, then they sucked.

"

Raycheetah wrote:

Because your assumption suits you better? It's the Google definition, not simply a web result. At any rate, it both:

A. Matches Google's recent socio-political bias

and

B. Hasn't been corrected, even though it's now a "thing."

You go ahead and assume what you like. As far as I'm concerned, Google (in violation of the corporate motto which they abandoned a few years ago) is being evil. =9[.]9=

It's not because it suits me better. If we are talking about the same thing, then we are talking about an automatic tool, so unless someone replaced the automatic answer for the one you posted, then there is no human influence (at least not from google, since someone that knows how the tool works might be able to find loopholes).

If you watched the video I send you, then you might have seen that for a while if you googled if "Obama was planning a coup" the answer would be "yes".

I don't know for how long it was like that, but it happened before, so it's more believable to me that it's the same thing, other than an political attack from google.

That is just my opinion tho, and without proof is just as accurate as yours.

did you read me? I said there's a difference between generalizing a party and an ideology, that's part of making a critic based on a and doing the same with a race, that is called racism.


You know you should really stop making huge wall of texts it doesn't make you look more intelligent and it doesn't make your point more valid, it's just longer to read and sometime when you write it you lose your focus on your point and stop making sense. Take example on Raicheetah, just a few sentences straight to the point and ou do not lost yourself into a meaningless long ass comment.

"

diablofdb wrote:

did you read me? I said there's a difference between generalizing a party and an ideology, that's part of making a critic based on a and doing the same with a race, that is called racism.

I will remind you of what you wrote:

"

diablofdb wrote:

The democrats have the very same way of thinking the KKK used to have and the Nazis used to have as...

It's not racist they are black, we can't be racist because they are black it's all ok...

"Democrats" is not an ideology. It's a group of people, I think I said that to you more than once now, but it seems that when I write "wall of texts" you don't even pay attention, is that or you have reading problems. You should check up for ADHD.(not a joke)

"

diablofdb wrote:

You know you should really stop making huge wall of texts it doesn't make you look more intelligent and it doesn't make your point more valid, it's just longer to read and sometime when you write it you lose your focus on your point and stop making sense. Take example on Raicheetah, just a few sentences straight to the point and ou do not lost yourself into a meaningless long ass comment.

Oh, I thought that Trump supporters liked HUGE BEAUTIFUL WALLS!!! (that is a joke)

Complaining about it doesn't make you look intelligent either. Not understanding what I write even though I'm detailed when writing makes it even worse.

I worry man. When I write long stuff you already pull assumptions about me out of your ass, if I write something shorter I wonder how you would twist things.