Donald Trump and US politics

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

"

soneka101 wrote:

The white-nationalist wants a global party for white people...

The only thing good to come from the alt-right were the memes. Whoever came up with using memes as propaganda tools was a genius.

A "global" party for white people is extremely naive. Who's going to fund it? Who's going to give it favorable coverage on TV? Nobody. Richard Spencer should stick to meme production full time. Because that's his best shot at gaining any political converts.

that's not even the same alt-right. alt-right was used by memers on 4chan as a definition of a new right that is more center and counter-culture regarding the regressive left ( "feminists that dont exist in real life" according to some that wont even turn on some channels or check what's going on in several universities included).
Then Spencer threw a bitch-fit cause he used the term alt-right for some time before /pol/ and thinks he deserves any meme war laurels or whatnot.
No one cares

also I wouldnt trust any statistics on who is more discriminated from groups that say such shit as pepe is a white supremacist icon. I trust what I see and what I see is that PC-progressive culture with the left is all too happy being against white and culture of the west overall and thinks discrimination is alright cause "there are too many white males in this field".
Quotas are a thing that only someone who discriminates would agree with. But its ok, "im not racist cause I think Im not". derp

Its funny that "progressives" are so against christians and whatnot (oh but not against jewish or islamits, that would be racist) cause by name and way of acting you are pretty much like the ones who follow "Intelligent design". A pretty name that elevates the person to more than what they are; at the end of the day both groups are a bunch of dumbfuck cultists.

Richard Spencer is a moron, just saying.

"

diablofdb wrote:

I generalized toward a way of thinking, an ideology, a political party not a race, which is terribly different.


mine is a critic, his is pure racism and hatred directed toward whites. The difference is, I'm attacking a political view and opinion, he's attacking an entire race.

"Democrats" is not an ideology, it's a group of people that are affiliated to a political party. One may argue that they are a group of people that gathered because of an ideology, but do you have proof that this ideology is the one that you said before? (the ideology that whites can't be discriminated against)

In theory this is the ideology of the democratic party:

"

The party's philosophy of modern liberalism advocates social and economic equality, along with the welfare state. It seeks to provide government intervention and regulation in the economy. These interventions, such as the introduction of social programs, support for labor unions, affordable college tuitions, moves toward universal health care and equal opportunity, consumer protection, and environmental protection form the core of the party's economic policy.

Sauce: Wikipedia

It's not hard for me to believe that there are some democrats that think white people can't be discriminated against. But believing that all of them do? Or that this is part of the ideology of their party? There is no reason for me to make that generalization.

And btw when you say "democrats" and "leftists" you are talking about groups of people, it might not be a group as bigger as a race, but like race they are categorized because they have one thing in common, and that doesn't mean everything else is also similar.

Now if you want to criticize an ideology you should use the name of that ideology, (e.g. liberalism), and not the name that is given to the people that belong to that group (e.g. liberals), unless that the criticism is related to the specific ideology that gathered that group. (Oh, and btw, I'm telling that you should do that if you don't want to generalize, if generalizing is your thing then do whatever you want, after all I'm just a dude on the internet, I can't impose rules on you)

"

diablofdb wrote:

I also find it funny that he is allowed to say racists thing against against whites, but when I call him on his hatred I'm the only one being censored. I guess racism against whites is tolerated. thx

I'm not censoring you, I'm having a discussion, like, you know... talking. Just because I don't agree with what you said it doesn't mean that I'm telling you to be quiet or something like that.

And are you implying that I should have said to her that whites can also be discriminated against? But, you already made that point to her didn't you? Isn't redundant for me to repeat what you said?

Besides, I only pointed out what you said because you were doing something that you said she shouldn't do. I thought that maybe you hadn't realized that you were doing it, so it's more like I'm helping you to stay true to your principles and to practice what you preach! See? I'm the good guy here! ;D (that is a joke)

"

diablofdb wrote:

and you were saying earlier that white do not get discriminated? oh you just made a fine example of discrimination.

Can you quote me where I said that? As far as I can remember what I have been saying all this time is that I'm skeptical that white and christians suffer the same amount of discrimination than other groups. I didn't even make an affirmation that they "don't suffer the same amount", although I don't believe they suffer the same amount, if anyone can prove it I'm open to acknowledge that statement.

---------

"

Xavderion wrote:

Richard Spencer is a moron, just saying.

I like when everyone can agree about a specific moron. It is as if you can go right, or left, you just better not go full retard and all is fine.

Google is now officially the Ministry of Truth:

"

Google Redefines “Fascism”, 1613

"

First Merriam-Webster:
Fascism: “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.”
The secondary definition is: “a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control.”

Ok, now go google the word Fascism. Here’s what you will see:
fas·cism ˈfaSHˌizəm/ noun an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5Rp36V-i3E

I checked it out myself, and, yep, this is real. ='[.]'=

So what you says is.... I can't critic your political party because you feel offended when your opinions are challenged, but you think it's ok to make generalization against an entire race. OK


You're not having a discussion with me you just writing a wall of text void of any meaning. you're literally avoiding any conversation and refuse any sort of critic. Somehow you compare, me disagreeing with a political group and Sarah making an extremly racist comment generalizing an entire population based on their race. OK


And you could be surprised about the amount of discrimination white suffer. There are literally entire hood where we can't go because people there would use violence against use purely based on the color of our skin. Stop playing the "I'm more discriminated therefore I'm more important" or playing the classic white guilt card. I'm not buying into this.

"

Raycheetah wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5Rp36V-i3E

I checked it out myself, and, yep, this is real. ='[.]'=

Liberal in action, let's call fachism anything that don't agree with us

"

Raycheetah wrote:

Google is now officially the Ministry of Truth:

"

Google Redefines “Fascism”, 1613

"

First Merriam-Webster:
Fascism: “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.”
The secondary definition is: “a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control.”

Ok, now go google the word Fascism. Here’s what you will see:
fas·cism ˈfaSHˌizəm/ noun an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5Rp36V-i3E

I checked it out myself, and, yep, this is real. ='[.]'=

Maybe that is related to this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgEPHIaScck

I know that some people on this forum don't like vox, but there it explains how that tool that gives you a featured answer works, and why sometimes it shows bullshit.

You may suspect that google is smearing right wing people, and although it might be a possibility, there is no evidence that someone did it on purpose, right? Until such evidence comes up I think we can just assume that the tool messed up, as it did before.

"

Xavderion wrote:

Richard Spencer is a moron, just saying.

"

Manocean wrote:

"

Xavderion wrote:

Richard Spencer is a moron, just saying.

I think everyone from the right wing would agree with that except 1 or 2 degenerate. But the left is sure trying big time to push it as, ohhhh look they all think like that guy, that's awfully wrong and such a shameful generalization.

Like I don't think every single person on the left is stupid enough to get their news from CNN, TYT and Buzzfeed.