In-Game Trade System: Cancelled?
" I understand the interest in outsourcing/cost-cutting, even if it isn’t “intentional” - as in they never really asked for the outsourcing, but it was basically inevitable given the incredibly impractical system in place originally. However, even if I understand the interest in outsourcing, that doesn’t mean I agree with the practice. If it was made clear that it was the direction GGG was taking with their game I would have to reconsider my support. Hence, the question. Get at me in game @Jyyn Do you like feedback? http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/355307/page/1 Last edited by Phoobrak on Aug 27, 2015, 8:53:01 PM
| |
" | |
" Agreed, these things take time. Agreed, an overhaul like this is likely to be costly, complex and divert a good part of the dev team's attention to be a success. Agreed, GGG is a small team with an ambitious project, and I respect that 100%! Here is a quote from Chris - pay attention to the date it was written: on February 8, 2013 1:31 AM " This means that about 31 months ago, GGG had begun work on such a system, and were already letting us know it was coming. What would, for you, be a reasonable timeframe for such a feature to be completed and implemented, keeping in mind that trading is the very most core feature of PoE as a game? This isn't a rhetorical question, I'm curious to know your thoughts on this because it is very important for the conversation. My issue with this, and the point of the OP, is that we have been left in the dark for much more than a year about a system overhaul that a great number of people seem to find crucial to their enjoyment of the game. The "response" quoted in the OP seems to indicate that we should stop hoping for such an addition. I am looking for a straight answer - it's OK if this is the direction the game is taking, I just need to know so I can adjust my support accordingly. Get at me in game @Jyyn Do you like feedback? http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/355307/page/1 Last edited by Phoobrak on Aug 27, 2015, 9:55:11 PM
| |
I'm sorry, but I really don't think it would be as difficult to make a searchable in-game database as GGG, or their white knights, would lead us to believe. Honestly I don't even really care if it ever happens any more. I just wish that GGG would be more forthright in their communication. I'm tired of all of the spin and misdirection.
Last edited by impotentwinnebago on Aug 27, 2015, 10:11:23 PM
|
|
" I'm 100% with you on that. I haven't been here for the longest time but I do notice the Dev's fail to speak out to many of the popular topics on the forums. Staying quiet is a much worse stance than occasionally making a fool of one's self. The latter is always almost forgivable. |
|
" I can't find the direct quote but the developer who was coding that left rather suddenly out of the blue to work for a different company and with GGG being in NZ they couldn't find anyone to replace him on the team in a timely manner. “Too often we underestimate the power of a touch, a smile, a kind word, a listening ear, an honest compliment, or the smallest act of caring, all of which have the potential to turn a life around.”
—Leo Buscaglia Contact support@grindinggear.com to report issues relating to the game or forum. Thanks! My beloved pets.... | |
" To expand on this, for those who didn't know, NZ law makes it really hard to hire people from abroad. You are only allowed to do that after you proved that you tried everything to hire from within the country. Works great in the health sector (Kiwipino nurses), but apparently not so great in the gaming sector. GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
| |
" it was rather that ggg decided their implementation wouldn't be good for the game because of players specifying buyouts, which i agree upon. see chris on trading @23:20 min. what i would like to see is an ingame interface where players could place offers of things they want to buy and having a price attached they can afford for that item. if nobody is selling for that price they have to increase their offer. that would prevent buyouts, is some sort of haggling, prevented flipping. i made a suggestion post about "bots" (buyer oriented trading system), didn't get much interest. most players are just interested in selling things as quick as possible at which point i just hint them to the ingame traders ;) age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill!
| |
" I see you are skeptical of Cowmageddon. Udder devastation is imminent - I for one welcome our bovine overlords. |
|
No sense spending time and money duplicating what somebody else already did a pretty good job with. Poe trade already gives a search function to find what you need. If GGG implements cross instance / asynchronous trading and a true method of showing who is online, we get pretty much everything we need. Add in a separate noticeboard for those who want to spend their gametime buying and selling and I think most issues are taken care of.
Guild Leader The Amazon Basin <BASIN>
Play Nice and Show Some Class www.theamazonbasin.com |