GZ FranzKafka, First level 100 on nemesis league!
" A highly organized 6 man party consisting of 5 45k dual strikers and one split arrow voltaxic character is almost as fast as one guy running spectre abuse with a tabula? do you actually read what you write? thats the very definition of a game breaking exploit. IGN: Arlianth
Check out my LA build: 1782214 |
![]() |
" Oh this is priceless. A game, where by design, one simply buys the pieces to out-gear content, then faceroll repeats the quickest levelling content in a party, using currency that other people found; and someone tries to find a way to claim the 'achievement' was tainted by some other method. Absolutely priceless. Casually casual.
|
![]() |
" So the best group make up for hc can clear as fast as a bugged char - thus all of the above should be nerfed was my point my friend. How did you divine that I didn't think there is a problem with cod minions? Which then poses the question: What is the difference of leveling to 100 with a falty mechanic or an overpowered spec as they both make gameplay too easy and are always fixed in future patches? These are nebulous areas - and for this specific reason qarl himself challenged the players of poe to break the game. unfortunately for me all the moralists had forgotten this and became highly offended =) If Kripp would've found out the cod + bm thing all of his followers would've had their knee pads on and mouths open - and asking him for glimpses of his build - but he didn't and now we're in this situation =) Last edited by FranzKafka#2523 on Jan 16, 2014, 2:43:45 AM
|
![]() |
" I'm not sure if you're making up that second part or whether it's legit. I only remember one particular time (though there could have been more) when an Alpha person or two got to stream a skill tree, and it was a skill tree that none of the others had seen by that point, as it had literally just gone up. As for copying LoL's testing policies, I can see why they'd prefer just to keep it private. People qq enough as it is without getting them worked up about stuff that might never even get implemented. |
![]() |
" Yes, its called balance, i dont know why this is hard to grasp. a group of 6 extremely well geared player should be able to clear astronomically faster than one person abusing a bug. This is like saying anyone with a 6 link item should be able to clear content faster than 6 people decked out with gear and that both methods should be nerfed. its imbalanced and I dont understand why you are trying to strawman the former with bug abuse. " I have issues with how you reached 100 I am simply voicing my concerns for an exploitative mechanic that was left in place for several weeks or months even though the Devs had full knowledge of its existence. IGN: Arlianth Check out my LA build: 1782214 Last edited by Nephalim#2731 on Jan 16, 2014, 2:43:51 AM
|
![]() |
" I assumed they had access to the other skill tree for at least 1 hour before they streamed. May be wrong though. As for LoL testing policies: do you really think that the PoE community will whine more than one of the worst commmunities known to mankind: the LoL community XD? I always assumed that the reason for why they want to keep the tested balance changes secret is because they simply want it to be a surprise and that "surprise feeling" has precedence over competitions. This message was delivered by GGG defence force.
|
![]() |
" I understand - but if one guy clears at a rate that shouldn't be attainable then no one should. I was merely trying to elucidate you about the nebulous area between specs being overpowered and glitches which I now clearly know that such attempts in the future should be saved for more capable targets =) PS I think dual strike is too strong too =) I was soloing 76s for almost the same xp that exinifte was grouping 78s - hoho Last edited by FranzKafka#2523 on Jan 16, 2014, 2:49:14 AM
|
![]() |
" An hour sounds plausible, but I don't see how it could make any measurable difference to a 4 month race, and wouldn't personally describe it as a long time :S |
![]() |
" Its not that nebulous and only a monkey would be convinced by your glib remarks and attempts to justify horrendous abuse of game mechanics. IGN: Arlianth
Check out my LA build: 1782214 |
![]() |
" As long as the advantage is higher than zero, it matters for the fairness paradigm :). This message was delivered by GGG defence force.
|
![]() |