Quality of Threads decreasing.

"

SL4Y3R wrote:

Considering theyre constantly hiring more people. Id say theyre doing pretty well. Hell, they recently got another office.

While im not the biggest fan of the razer deal, like it or not. This is a business. If chris feels it was worth it fine. Its not like I have to see it.

"

Archwizard wrote:

I have no idea what makes you think they don't care. Do you see the rate they patch the game and work on stuff? Just because their priorities and workflows don't match your expectations it doesn't mean they don't care.

"

Real_Wolf wrote:

Is this thread now just randomly starting discussions about the discussions taking place in other threads?

Can I select the next one we discuss, as it appears that discusssing Razer Footprints has been completed!


Lets discuss "Decoy totem does not work on some map bosses"

"

SL4Y3R wrote:

Considering theyre constantly hiring more people. Id say theyre doing pretty well. Hell, they recently got another office.

While im not the biggest fan of the razer deal, like it or not. This is a business. If chris feels it was worth it fine. Its not like I have to see it.

"

Tomorrow wrote:

Notice the dates these 2 event happened?

If you are in financial trouble and sold razor some hallow dreams. What do you do next? Get a new office, make razor think its going to be something big, make them give you more money for the next 10 years. At least thats how I would do it.

Yes, they are hiring new people, but stop and think for a second. Is it possible as game get bigger, an indie company like GGG is having trouble handling it? Which means, they need to hire more people, leads to spend more money.

Also, whats the projected income for GGG next quarter? Is it possible, the CB money is gone, the OB fever cooled down, now the game isnt profiting as much as Chris expected? That would also explain why they are releasing the game even though the only new content is just A3x.

Remember, GGG planed to have this game stay in OB for 10 years, until they finished all 10 act.

"

Moosifer wrote:

"

Tomorrow wrote:

Notice the dates these 2 event happened?

If you are in financial trouble and sold razor some hallow dreams. What do you do next? Get a new office, make razor think its going to be something big, make them give you more money for the next 10 years. At least thats how I would do it.

Yes, they are hiring new people, but stop and think for a second. Is it possible as game get bigger, an indie company like GGG is having trouble handling it? Which means, they need to hire more people, leads to spend more money.

Also, whats the projected income for GGG next quarter? Is it possible, the CB money is gone, the OB fever cooled down, now the game isnt profiting as much as Chris expected? That would also explain why they are releasing the game even though the only new content is just A3x.

Remember, GGG planed to have this game stay in OB for 10 years, until they finished all 10 act.

How long does this circle jerk keep going? People who have no idea of the inner workings claiming GGG is flush with cash and also broke.

I THINK (as IMO) GGG is doing fine and wouldn't get another office just from a deal with razor. I doubt they are dumping that much money into a game that isn't widely known. Especially enough that they can handle the monthly cost of another office.

Although we have no signs that they are struggling for cash which is why I think most of us assume they are fine.

Tomorrow, just relax. Take a break from the game, like get away completely for a month or 2. You are going crazy for no reason.

"

casval776 wrote:

Not picking a side is ridiculously worse than picking a side.

Your indifference is the problem. None of us have concrete proof for one extreme or the other, however, the agnostic approach doesn't help any side of the argument or contribute anything to, well, anything at all.

Content Removed by Admin: See Forum Guideline C

"

Jojas wrote:

"

casval776 wrote:

Not picking a side is ridiculously worse than picking a side.

Your indifference is the problem. None of us have concrete proof for one extreme or the other, however, the agnostic approach doesn't help any side of the argument or contribute anything to, well, anything at all.

Content Removed by Admin: See Forum Guideline C

Help with what?