Does lion's roar increase bleed damage?
|
I'm with you. It's not intuitive how "increased damage with attacks/attack skills" is a completely different thing from "attack skills deal increased damage", but it seems to be.
This is PoE though, so there is a lot of stuff like that. |
|
|
its intuitive if you bracket it and seperate it into terms, you get used to doing that after a while because its how they write things.
If you want unintuitive try the double armour keystone lol that thing has the worst description, but maybe the whole things that bad until you know enough to read it. |
|
|
There is no way to easily tell whether a difference in language is intentional parsing with a coherent logic behind it, or just a random difference in usage because someone was sloppy. Both exist. :-)
|
|
" That one is much clearer than the leech nodes or knowing what affects bleed. |
|
|
personally I don't think a node that says maximum damage reduction for any damage type is 50% is clear :p
Its written in the worst way it could be saying any damage type when it only works on one is already deliberately misleading its like having all the tooltips written by a bad pedant. Leech nodes and bleed aren't intuitive but at least their wording makes sense once you can read it |
|
" It says that even though this keystone only doubles armour, its downside is applied to any damage type. So it means that elenental damage can only be reduced by 50%... does that include the resistances though? No idea. The more i think the more i agree with you, that keystone is a whole mess. Its a very bad one anyway so ill never use it unless it get reworked. Last edited by Krayken#1299 on Dec 11, 2020, 3:40:18 PM
|
|
