PoE = PoRN (Path of Random Numbers)

"

RestInPieces wrote:

In the end, no matter how many times you say "Shakespeare" or "Nietzsche", you are still a troll. You can't fool me.

There was a term that I enjoyed. Charan used it, I believe it was called reverse-engineering. Did you know that you can reverse-engineer the current instance of any person's action or thought right back to the roots of its origin? For an example, you've called me a troll, but do you know what made you call me a troll, what I did that provoked you to call me a troll, and if there was any reason or sensible background behind it at all?

"

IExiledOtherExilesToBeTheExile wrote:

"

neondrop wrote:

Edit: After reading the last post of IExiled, I realised you could also see this whole thread as a satire on these forums ^_^

Hint: William Shakespeare's "All the world's a stage" quote; mixed with Nietzsche's conceptual understanding of how the entirety of this world is but a void we see ourselves in; mixed with the negativity on these boards.

that's pretty much my outlook on life.

You know the world's economy is based off of perception? That means we could actually will ourselves to economic success. We got out of the depression by fighting in WW2, could have just built a bunch of tanks and tossed them in the ocean.

back to the day job. Really hope I can get that new TV, that's what my kids will remember.

"

Wittgenstein wrote:

that's pretty much my outlook on life.

You know the world's economy is based off of perception? That means we could actually will ourselves to economic success. We got out of the depression by fighting in WW2, could have just built a bunch of tanks and tossed them in the ocean.

back to the day job. Really hope I can get that new TV, that's what my kids will remember.

Ahh, Wittgenstein. Interesting philosopher, I'd say.

The economy is based on something much more than perception. It is a projected image of our deepest desires folded into an inescapable chain of consequential illusions. The very fact that it exists and ties in with our voided contemptment only tells a story that is greater than any personal radius could achieve.

All wars begin because people's dreams become bigger than what the world is able to offer. It doesn't matter if you are a war inducer or not, your big dreams trigger big egos, and so the war will always begin unless people are put in their place respectively. Bullies get their way. Business men get their way. As long as the monkey reigns, the world will plunder into and by decades of monkey squat.

"

IExiledOtherExilesToBeTheExile wrote:

"

fortyb4five wrote:

fail troll is fail.

Actually, you've failed to read satire. You assumed the worst. I predicted it. I've won the internetz.

I will give you a proposition. You cannot say that I've lost an argument until fortyB4five properly responds to my collected counter-point about this alleged trolling.

Do not count your chickens before they hatch, for if you miscount, you could end up inadvertently murdering a few.

Fact

These types of game revolve around RNGs

Fiction

Anyone gives a fuck what you think about the most underlying principle of any loot based game.

"

IExiledOtherExilesToBeTheExile wrote:

I will give you a proposition. You cannot say that I've lost an argument until fortyB4five properly responds to my collected counter-point about this alleged trolling.

Do not count your chickens before they hatch, for if you miscount, you could end up inadvertently murdering a few.

Since we are now talking pure randomness and not purely on randomness.

Have you ever had battered chicken?

Most batters use egg.

Think about it.

"

Delmas wrote:

Fact

These types of game revolve around RNGs

Fiction

Anyone gives a fuck what you think about the most underlying principle of any loot based game.

Ahh, Delmas. I was expecting you to be lured into my satire, hence your signature is self-explanatory. Don't take things so seriously so suddenly. My OP is about teaching people to cool their jets before making hasty decisions. If it wasn't for this test, you and fortyB4five would be in legitimate complaint threads making a mess out of it through your own ill-considered spite.

2/10

Would not read again.

"

Luvz wrote:

2/10

Would not read again.

Take a look at the people that took the OP seriously. You personally can give the old 'X/X' routine, but you mistaken the intent behind it all.