Latency problems on Japan realm
" Thanks for that. Unfortunately, a lot of it seems hidden behind Cloudflare, so it's difficult to know how things are working. | |
|
Just a reminder: As of 10 minutes ago to the Japan gateway.
Old provider in Tokyo IBM/Softlayer - route/latency is correct  New provider - Unity/Multiplay  Last edited by Kellog on Jun 11, 2019, 5:12:47 AM
| |
 Last edited by Dehale on Jun 11, 2019, 5:47:25 AM
| |
|
Yes, the game is not really smooth at all while playing on Moscow. I will try WTFast but I'm not going to pay 10$ a month just to play poe :(
|
|
"WTFast unstable | |
|
Ding ding
| |
|
Using WTFast atm. Its a solution, but its unstable on Japan realm. Playing now on Singapore realm with 100ms and have feeling that its more comfortable than 40ms Japan with this program.
Also sent it to tech support today, dont know what mean "-m" in server name but on server "tok-m.speedtest.pathofexile.com" i have 200ms. On server without "-m" i have 40ms but lost 19% of packages at "ae5.cbs02.eq01.tok01.networklayer.com"
Spoiler
tok.speedtest.pathofexile.com |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | ospd-gw.ospd.net - 0 | 550 | 550 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | | 10.251.14.121 - 0 | 550 | 550 | 5 | 8 | 164 | 113 | | 10.251.14.120 - 0 | 550 | 550 | 5 | 5 | 38 | 5 | | 87.226.133.15 - 0 | 550 | 550 | 38 | 38 | 57 | 38 | | 218.100.6.65 - 0 | 550 | 550 | 37 | 37 | 68 | 37 | | ae5.cbs02.eq01.tok01.networklayer.com - 19 | 319 | 261 | 38 | 39 | 52 | 39 | | 58.10.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com - 0 | 550 | 550 | 38 | 39 | 78 | 39 | | 87.76.85a2.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com - 0 | 550 | 550 | 38 | 38 | 63 | 38 | | db.76.85a2.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com - 0 | 550 | 550 | 38 | 38 | 84 | 38 | | speedtest.tok02.softlayer.com - 0 | 550 | 550 | 38 | 38 | 44 | 38 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider tok-m.speedtest.pathofexile.com |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | ospd-gw.ospd.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | | 10.251.14.123 - 0 | 587 | 587 | 5 | 10 | 156 | 6 | | 10.251.14.120 - 0 | 587 | 587 | 5 | 5 | 51 | 5 | | 188.254.26.51 - 0 | 587 | 587 | 129 | 129 | 165 | 129 | | 10gigabitethernet1-3.core1.sto1.he.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 131 | 131 | 138 | 131 | | 100ge12-1.core1.fra1.he.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 158 | 158 | 168 | 158 | | 100ge5-1.core1.zrh2.he.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 158 | 158 | 238 | 158 | | 100ge7-1.core1.mil2.he.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 156 | 160 | 294 | 156 | | 100ge14-1.core1.mrs1.he.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 169 | 170 | 195 | 169 | | 100ge14-2.core1.sin1.he.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 208 | 208 | 236 | 208 | | 100ge16-2.core1.tyo1.he.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 202 | 203 | 224 | 202 | |profuse-solutions-llc.10gigabitethernet1-17.core1.tyo1.he.net - 0 | 587 | 587 | 202 | 203 | 219 | 203 | | 10.0.0.6 - 0 | 587 | 587 | 203 | 203 | 212 | 204 | | 103.102.160.138 - 0 | 587 | 587 | 202 | 202 | 210 | 202 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider |
|
" Unfortunately, as far as Path of Exile is concerned, the latency test against: tok.speedtest.pathofexile.com is meaningless now, as it's the route to the old provider - Softlayer/IBM. The tok-m.speedtest.pathofexile.com appears to be the new provider Unity/Multiplay. In one of the emails I received from GGG support, they say: " The new provider is the issue. Last edited by Kellog on Jun 12, 2019, 4:21:05 AM
|
