Poll: Should we add Nets that work on Dead Beasts?

My suggestion: Make a last tier of net that only works on dead red beasts. Imo if you take the risk of fighting them you should have a second chance (at a decent cost for the net) if they die without getting caught for whatever reason.

Imagine the league intergrates into std and your 5m dps becomes a problem..

"Yes" from me.

no, plz keep it as it is
capture dead mobs would take the challenge away

maybe implement rare nets that have a small additional chance for success or that have better chances at little more monster health

I agree with capturing dead beasts isn't needed, but I'm playing with Slayer and the ascendancy "kill enemies that have 20% or lower life" makes too hard to capture the beasts...the nets fail a lot and the beasts always enrage.

I don't imagine how I do this league with this!

I'm frustrated! I don't want to change my character because of my choice for ascendancy.

PS.: I think people playing with DoT and Minion can't control the damage on the beasts just as I do not control the "Hit Kill" of the Slayer's culling strike.

"

BigFatCaeZZar wrote:

Imagine the league intergrates into std and your 5m dps becomes a problem..

"Yes" from me.

Your 5M DPS IS a problem. Sigh.

I voted for 'Yes, but more rare'.

I dont like this simplistic fix but reason why I prefer it over 'No' is that I dont trust the netting to work properly. My impression is that the implementation (netting and the beasts) is just too messy. Maybe I just dont understand the mechanics (yet?). It may also be that the monster life bar isnt updated properly for the client. I also dont know how the netting actually works with culling strike etc. Basically I am left in the dark (so to speak) as to how the core league mechanic actually works in detail. Unfortunately this "detail" knowledge is necessary for success if I dont have uber DPS or sth vs very durable beasts. I dont expect GGG to part with this knowledge and extensive experimentation isnt fun for me. So 'Yes, but more rare' is the most appealing choice here. 'No' with detail knowledge of net mechanics (and no bugs etc) would be better though.

I don't get why so many no votes, can't the people who don't want to capture dead beasts just not use those nets if they don't like that idea? Then both camps are happy.

Its probably too late but a support gem that stops a Golem from attacking - like a passive mode would be useful. Maybe it could spend its time breaking pots or opening chests instead

"

SP3cTr0 wrote:

I agree with capturing dead beasts isn't needed, but I'm playing with Slayer and the ascendancy "kill enemies that have 20% or lower life" makes too hard to capture the beasts...the nets fail a lot and the beasts always enrage.

I don't imagine how I do this league with this!

I'm frustrated! I don't want to change my character because of my choice for ascendancy.

PS.: I think people playing with DoT and Minion can't control the damage on the beasts just as I do not control the "Hit Kill" of the Slayer's culling strike.

You realize this is a classic case of carpenter blaming his tools, though right?

You can not take culling strike on Slayer if you want to be good at capturing beasts. Or make another class. Slayer is supposed to be exactly that, a Slayer. Not a hunter.

"

Xavathos wrote:

The majority of outspoken opinions do not seem to reflect the numbers. What's going on?

I know people who like to exploit systems are more likely to use it here to win the vote, spending their time voting with multiple accounts instead of discussing here. Should we really let the future of the game be decided based on such exploits?

Should we start being dishonest as well and cast multiple votes on no? I hope it won't come down to that.

Key to listening to your community is the word itself. Don't look, listen.

There have been many great points made against inclusion if "dead nets" and only one in favour of it. If we can address the issue of control for summoners, we don't need these nets at all, as far as I can tell.

Yeah pretty much.

It would be retarded to get beast for free.