Donald Trump and US politics
" again.... because you disagree with them you label them as the "alt-right" like I've said.... labeling name calling. Very long text just to push up more of the same. You first play a mix of victim card and shaming card, then you end into labeling and name calling. I'm not saying the right is right, but I can tell you this, I support them now because they are not what the liberals became. Liberals became everything they used to fight against. lol just check the bill M103 in Canada. This is the closest you can get to fascism. Edit: out of context but I just wanted to share Last edited by diablofdb on Feb 20, 2017, 8:54:13 AM
| |
"It's not really radicalization so much as substitution. I kind of glossed over it, but: promoting feelings, intimidation, indoctrination and identity means conning the populace. Fascism is being actively promoted, falsely labeled as liberalism, and suckers are falling for it and turning themselves into fascists. Although perhaps that's what radicalization truly is. One could make the argument, for example, that true Islam is a religion of peace, and that anyone who would kill others in its name is not truly a Muslim. However, if this is true, than why are Islamic cultures disproportionately effected by this second ideology that replaces Islam with brutality? It seems the parasitic ideology is tailored to its host in such a way that increased vulnerability to it is a trait of Islam in particular (as opposed to Christianity). The same could perhaps be said of liberalism and its relationship with this new fascism. When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted. Last edited by ScrotieMcB on Feb 20, 2017, 9:28:12 AM
|
|
" http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/ "Alt-right" is, for all intents and purposes, their chosen title. Personally, I prefer not to sugarcoat a movement made up in no small part of neo-nazis and white supremacists; after all, it was Richard Spencer, an out-and-proud neo-nazi, who coined the term in the first place. Perhaps the problem is not that the left is too hasty to "label", but that you are a bit thin-skinned? Or are you agreeing that there's clearly something wrong with the so-called "alt-right", and that bearing that label should be a sign of shame? " I play the victim card? You're the one complaining about people calling you names. The "shaming" card? You mean pointing out shameful behavior as shameful? You didn't even try to address my points. Not surprising at this point, mind you... " Here is the full text of "Bill" M-103. " Again, for someone who is so pissed off about name-calling and labeling, you sure are quick to call things "fascism"! That's another thing I see very often from the right - refer to anything aimed at inclusiveness or fighting bigotry as "fascism" or "attacking free speech". It's exactly the same kind of labeling and name-calling you object to so much on the left. Why doesn't it bother you when the right does it? But notice anything missing from this "law"? Here's a few things: - Any change to the law that would lead to people losing their rights - Any change to the law that would have any effect on the general populace - Any change to the law whatsoever It's not even a bill. It's a motion. Motions are different from bills. It does nothing to change existing law, its sole purpose is to help clarify the priorities and goals of the parliament. And there is nothing wrong with pointing out, particularly in the wake of an islamophobic terrorist attack and a rising tide of right-wing nationalism among western nations, that islamophobia, racism, and religious discrimination are problems that should be looked into in more detail. How, exactly, does this qualify as "fascism"? And also, was a very similar motion passed in 2015 with unanimous support from the canadian parliament decrying the rise of global antisemitism also "fascist"? Luna's Blackguards - a guild of bronies - is now recruiting! If you're a fan of our favourite chromatic marshmallow equines, hit me up with an add or whisper, and I'll invite you! IGN: HopeYouAreFireProof Last edited by Budget_player_cadet on Feb 20, 2017, 9:44:08 AM
|
|
By the way, when I say "fascism" what I mean is: the ideology that the use of physical violence against those who do not initiate it is morally justifiable to silence speech running contrary to one's narrative. I disagree strongly with this recent trend to use fascism as a synonym for bigotry or for bigoted government, as if Nazi Germany was fascist because anti-Semitism; no, idiots, it was fascist because brown-shirts and gestapo. The issue at play with fascism is acceptance (or lack thereof) of diversity of thought, not diversity of identity. Although trust me, failing to respect the former is a sure way to lose the latter.
That's the key concept I feel people don't get. Diversity of identity is fully dependent upon diversity of thought. You don't get slavery abolished without freedom of the press. You don't get a woman's right to vote without freedom of assembly. You don't get equal rights for LGBT without free speech on the Internet. If you think for a moment that criminalizing the ability of a person to do whatever they want, so long as they don't impose upon the similar liberties of others with force or fraud, is going to help you promote diversity, you are driving the farmer to feed the livestock. You are inviting the worst discrimination is relived in reverse, revenge bigotry. When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted. Last edited by ScrotieMcB on Feb 20, 2017, 10:06:44 AM
|
|
>casually and vaguely mention Sweden
>the entire media gets baited into throwing a tantrum over literally nothing >everyone starts talking about sweden >people get redpilled as fuck on sweden 7D check mate GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
| |
That would make sense were it not for his representatives' previous comments about Bowling Green and Atlanta. At what point does "the President of the United States and members of his administration making up fake terrorist attacks" become disturbing? I'd say "one", personally, but that's just me.
But then again, maybe I'm just stuck in the past, where what a president had to say had any meaning whatsoever, and people speaking from a position of extreme power chose their words carefully, so as to let their allies and enemies know when they were serious and when they were not. Maybe we're in a new paradigm, where absolutely nothing the president of the United States of America says can be taken literally, and they cannot be trusted to choose their words carefully and honestly. I wouldn't call that a good thing in any context, mind you, but maybe I just read too many books. Like 1984. Luna's Blackguards - a guild of bronies - is now recruiting! If you're a fan of our favourite chromatic marshmallow equines, hit me up with an add or whisper, and I'll invite you! IGN: HopeYouAreFireProof Last edited by Budget_player_cadet on Feb 20, 2017, 10:08:29 AM
|
|
" The president of the united states used Fox news as his source. Nice of you to forget that. Typical Trump supporter, no critique on your supreme leader but on those that critique him and his way of gathering resources. |
|
Honestly, this whole narrative that Trump is somehow playing 11th dimensional chess or whatever is just stupid. It ignores how legitimately harmful his actions are to his own movement, his credibility, and the US abroad. What happens when the president can't be trusted to be taken seriously or literally about, well, anything? How do allies and enemies react to that? Meanwhile, Trump has had more than a few significant blunders that would seem to indicate to no small degree that he really is as thin-skinned and narcissistic as he appears to be at first glance. What possible purpose is served by turning a question by a jewish reporter about rising antisemitism into an answer about how well he did in the election?
Luna's Blackguards - a guild of bronies - is now recruiting! If you're a fan of our favourite chromatic marshmallow equines, hit me up with an add or whisper, and I'll invite you!
IGN: HopeYouAreFireProof |
|
" Exactly that is why people complain about that bill because of that word. We all know what it mean. Everytime someon slightly disagree with liberals values there's not even a half way word to describe it, you call them fascist. Everytime someone disagree with Islam they run to fight and call them Islamophobe. So let's be honest, this is a law to send to prison everyone who would slightly disagree with islam. | |
" Wrong. |
|