Donald Trump and US politics

"

innervation wrote:

https://twitter.com/InTheYear1611/status/854694555500900352

So this is pretty funny. ANTIFA are marching at Auburn(?) or somewhere down south where you can't march/demonstrate/whatever they were doing with masks and bandanas on. So the police tell them nicely that they can either take their masks off and proceed, or be arrested. If only Berkley cops weren't told to stand down by their cowardly and treasonous leader...

Bonus funny: twitter labels this 'sensitive material'. There's no violence and I don't think anyone even swears...wtf?

Something else they're gonna find more of down south than they did in Berkeley is ass beatings. The police just saved them from getting routed yet again.

Oh and they're dressed like they're larping as ISIS fighters.

"

innervation wrote:

https://twitter.com/InTheYear1611/status/854694555500900352

So this is pretty funny. ANTIFA are marching at Auburn(?) or somewhere down south where you can't march/demonstrate/whatever they were doing with masks and bandanas on. So the police tell them nicely that they can either take their masks off and proceed, or be arrested. If only Berkley cops weren't told to stand down by their cowardly and treasonous leader...

Bonus funny: twitter labels this 'sensitive material'. There's no violence and I don't think anyone even swears...wtf?

My favorite takeaway from that:



=^[.]^=

"

Pwnzors87 wrote:

"

Raycheetah wrote:

"

Pwnzors87 wrote:

And that Bill whittle guy is a joke, act´s like he talk´s to child´s. If most of the world is already owned by someone, there is not much of equal opportunity left. Well, of course you can try to open a resteraunt close to a McDonald´s, but that won´t turn out that well.

Bill's got a video debunking the "finite economic pie" fallacy, too, but I dun think you'd appreciate it. =9[.]9=

That´s gona be my last reply to not apear as a ""ignorant foreigner""(thanks God ;D).

I didnt find it, but i can assume what it´s about. Well of course the economy is technicly infinite, but i don´t know how much Pc´s somebody want´s to own, or how much Food one has to eat each day. But jeah, there is enough room for growth left.

I watch the Video to the end now. Pro economic growth and anti Immigration actually contradict´s itself. More People more economy. You can either move the infrastructur or the worker, and i asume moving the worker´s is cheaper. That basicly only leaves the ""culture"" factor left. That´s why marxism target´s that Topic especialy, no negativ argument´s left then.

I dont know much People complaining about brainsurgend´s, he act´s like the other extreme doesn´t exist. Funnily enough, he talk´s about Money in another Video, and how intrest isn´t physical work. The Basic message of his Video was, in the industrialised world there gotta be winner´s and looser´s. I wunder if he has the gut´s to say that in front of a ghetto.

Simply put, one person's wealth does not automatically deprive another person of any or all of that wealth. It's not a finite pie; enterprise and success makes the pie bigger. The opposing fallacy is the basis of a large part of the discontent of many who feel that, since they've been "robbed of their due," they have a right to demand it back, and have no particular responsibility for their own success. ='[.]'=

"

Pwnzors87 wrote:

More People more economy.

What does "more economy" even mean? Compare some small country like Singapore, vs big country like Brasil. Which has "more economy" in your opinion and why would you rather live in Singapore? ;)

And "more people" can also mean a bigger load on the welfare system. It entirely depends on the quality of the people that you let in and the reasons they want to come to your country.

"

morbo wrote:

"

Pwnzors87 wrote:

More People more economy.

What does "more economy" even mean? Compare some small country like Singapore, vs big country like Brasil. Which has "more economy" in your opinion and why would you rather live in Singapore? ;)

And "more people" can also mean a bigger load on the welfare system. It entirely depends on the quality of the people that you let in and the reasons they want to come to your country.

...Please watch the video from ray first.
It´s not my intention to promote Immigration or convince anybody from it.
That billW talk´s about declining birthrate´s in the first world.
I could´ve very well wrote, make more baby´s then. But as it stand´s now, we either exapt empty factory´s or move foreign people´s in. And if your factory´s move out of your Country, that´s i assume bad for the Country.

Well, stale or declining birthrate´s could technicly be wayne, but we live in the hamsterwheel, where each Country has to look were it stands. If each continent would stick to his market, we wouldnt have poor country´s in the first place, but that´s to much Socialism.

That´s the ""Higher Entity/Faith/Nature"" and ""Culture,Race(ups he said it)"" factor.
That Bill whittle guy certainly didn´t use picture´s of IQ160 asian´s as his negative example. My statemant assume´s, we talk about equaly blant/good personality´s.

To promote massimmigration, Marxist partie´s have to desperatly convince evrybody that we are just all the same. They realy believe that, and if they call you a fashist they realy mean it. Once evrybody agree´s, there is no argument against third world Immigration left. In adition, ""interbreeding"" is supossed to put a emotional pressure on the native Population. Listen, I´m not nostradamus, Afrika could very well become the pike of humanity tomorrow, i just judge based on the present.

I understand the rationale of replacing a lower birth rate with foreign immigrants, tho this has mostly to do with the socialist welfare ponzi scheme (need more fodder to pay for future social expenses) and not with economy needs themselves. I simply disagree that more people automatically means "more" (a better?) economy.

Flooding your country with uneducated low-skilled africans (as opposed to replacing missing labourers with robots or AI, where possible or force welfare recipients off their asses), will only exacerbate the social problem further - putting even more pressure on the future generation, that will have to pay social security to this generation. Until the inevitable collapse of the social welfare state (prob. followed by civil war, where everyone will loose).

Declining birth rates are supposedly a problem, but at the same time we know that developed economies are more and more automatized (=need less workers). Moving the factories is also good from a declining population pov, and as we have seen with China, moving factories is not a problem at all.

TLDR: Flooding your countries with 3rd world immigrants is a short-term cheap solution, that will inevitably cause a long-term collapse, as more people not necessarily translates to "more economy".

When liberals start dressing like ISIS because they disagree with Trump you know you voted for right person.

"

diablofdb wrote:

When liberals start dressing like ISIS because they disagree with Trump you know you voted for right person.

It took that long?! ;)

"

diablofdb wrote:

When liberals start dressing like ISIS because they disagree with Trump you know you voted for right person.

Contrary to what you might believe, Democrat party isn't a liberal party. Democrat party is a centrist party that tries to manifester as being a left party to win support from the left.

"

deathflower wrote:

Contrary to what you might believe, Democrat party isn't a liberal party. Democrat party is a centrist party that tries to manifester as being a left party to win support from the left.

Then why are the most popular and vocal democrats so left leaning