Another gunman shooting! We need stricter gun control laws!!!

"
Velocireptile wrote:
Im going to put this in words that people on Forums will understand.

In real life, you can't just say "Civilian Class can not equip Semi-Automatic Weapons"

Well you can SAY that, but it wont be Coded into the game.

And if you do patch it in, well then people are just going to cheat and use Semi Automatic Weapons on their Civilian Character anyway if they want to go Player Kill and Grief others.

But now, all 'Good Players' that don't want to cheat, are unable to PvP against the PK'er with the Hacked Weapon.
So they are essentially just Critters to him.


You could try to delete the Folder containing the Semi-Automatic Weapon files. But then Gold Farmers will just find a way to import them into the Game and make a lot of money. The PKer knows this.

This wont deter the PK'er. He has decided that what he wants to do is Grief People and PK. Because he is no good at the Game, but he doesn't just want to go quietly into the night. He wants to make a lot of noise and have everyone talk about him as he Rage Quits Life.
It's similar to people Raging on the Forums about how bad PoE is.

So you see?

And you can TRY to argue against this with "oh but it WOULD do this"... but the facts are stacked against you.

Prohibition has never worked.
Mass shootings are planned and deliberate acts, not crimes of passion that could be avoided by a small speed bump on the way to a Gun Store.
Mass shootings are carried out with Illegally Obtained fire-arms already, making them double illegal wont really matter to these people.
Telling people "you cant defend yourself from criminals because guns are illegal... but yes we understand that criminals don't care and they will still use guns to harm you" will never go down well.

Peoples personal opinion of "Guns are bad, get rid of them all" are a mute point in this debate.
I agree, a WORLD without guns would be good. But that is not at all going to happen. Nothing remotely close to that will ever happen without Other Worldly Intervention.
Because as long as there are bad people, willing to do harm onto others... they will use the most efficient tools they can.

A side note, I live in Australia, I don't know the exact figure, but we have had mass shootings too, also with illegal firearms.

(Illegal Fire Arms = Guns that shouldn't actually be in the country)


*Applauds!* =^[.]^=
=^[.]^= basic (happy/amused) cheetahmoticon: Whiskers/eye/tear-streak/nose/tear-streak/eye/
whiskers =@[.]@= boggled / =>[.]<= annoyed or angry / ='[.]'= concerned / =0[.]o= confuzzled /
=-[.]-= sad or sleepy / =*[.]*= dazzled / =^[.]~= wink / =~[.]^= naughty wink / =9[.]9= rolleyes #FourYearLie
The big problem in America is our culture. There are countries with more guns and less gun deaths. Whether it be education, our massively inflated egos, or whatever societal issues plague America, there is obviously a problem here outside the fact that people have guns. Laws will stop some, but no where near all of these shootings. Until people actually realize the problem isn't "Don take muh guns away u liberal fa**ot luver!" the real problem won't be researched/determined.
Or maybe we should stop giving these fucktards thier five minutes of fame.
HAIL SATAN!
"
tramshed wrote:
Or maybe we should stop giving these fucktards thier five minutes of fame.
i don't even know who did it, i'm not really interested at the history of this kind of people+ i don't watch news aside from the front pages of yahoo from time to time when i go to my mail account
top kek
"
bhavv wrote:
Hasn't anyone thought of the compromise of requiring a psych analysis before being allowed to buy a gun?
More to the point, they should require psych analysis before letting people such as the perpetrator join the military.

By the way, why is no one in this thread considering that the motherfucker was in the military, and thus it would be virtually impossible to create a gun control law which would realistically keep him away from firearms?
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
"
Septile wrote:
It seems like nobody in this thread has actually talked to a police officer in the US or knows anything about criminal justice in the US, cause some people are painting it as if these mass murderers just take the gun out of their dresser and go on a rampage, which couldn't be further from the truth.

Guns are not as simple as movies and video games make them seem. The vast majority of guns confiscated by many police departments are defective in some way, the bullets are loaded in backwards, the wrong magazine, the wrong ammunition, it's jammed, or it's a gun that isn't capable of being fired even if everything else was set right.

These shootings are not crimes of passion, they don't happen simply because millions of Americans happen to own guns, accessibility of the gun isn't even a variable the shooter would consider. These are deliberate, calculated murder sprees with the intent of an insignificant person trying to make themselves significant. And it's an anomaly, it should be treated as such.

At least 80% of crimes in the US are committed under the influence of drugs or alcohol, with alcohol taking up the majority percentage by far. Should we ban alcohol? Oh wait, already tried that.




the alcohol didnt let them kill people 30 feet away by pulling a trigger, the gun did. If alcohol allowed you to be able to kill at 30 feet, guess what, it would be banned.

You cant argue that having tons of guns around doesnt change mass murder at all, that is obviously not true. There are countries with more guns and less shootings, yeah probably, and there are countries with comparatively little guns and comparatively little shootings when put against either of them. Mass killings are premeditated, ya sure a lot of them are, you think they are not made easier by guns? Truth is in most cases they are only possible with guns, without access to guns the idea stops being something that can be put in reality for the majority of people.

Can you now stop Americans having easy access to guns? That is the question. Is it possible to go from where you are now to where a lot of european countries are at given there are already so many circulating? The answer may be no, and that may invalidate making them illegal. But trying to argue that having a ton of guns doesnt change the mass murder problem is just wrong. guns make it easier to kill people, it is a fact, thats why they were invented, thats why our armies use them. No guns = its a lot harder to kill people.



"accessibility of the gun isn't even a variable the shooter would consider"

yeah why is that? because guns are everywhere. accessibility of a gun is the reason that mass murders are not even a viable train of thought for most people in my country, guess why its different? Gun accessibility is different.
I love all you people on the forums, we can disagree but still be friends and respect each other :)
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
bhavv wrote:
Hasn't anyone thought of the compromise of requiring a psych analysis before being allowed to buy a gun?
More to the point, they should require psych analysis before letting people such as the perpetrator join the military.



well they sort of do, they put you through really hard training/jaw dropping amounts of nationalist propaganda and most people who arnt potential amoral killers willing to commit atrocities based on flimsy justifications are weeded out, on purpose, along with anyone who has that kind of mindset but lacks the skills to do a good job of it.

If you cant put a bullet in a 12 year olds head because you have a mind full of messed up ideas that dont even make sense then you really got no place being in large parts of the armed forces.
I love all you people on the forums, we can disagree but still be friends and respect each other :)
Last edited by Snorkle_uk#0761 on Sep 18, 2013, 1:58:32 PM
"
Snorkle_uk wrote:
Can you now stop Americans having easy access to guns? That is the question.
No, it isn't.

The question is "Can you now stop members of the American military having easy access to guns?"
Because the fucker was in the military.

By the way, the answer is obviously "no."

The next question is how to prevent fuckers like that from joining the military... which I'm sure is something they are currently coming up with plans for right now, and no further QQ on our part is necessary.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Sep 18, 2013, 2:00:17 PM
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
Snorkle_uk wrote:
Can you now stop Americans having easy access to guns? That is the question.
No, it isn't.

The question is "Can you now stop members of the American military having easy access to guns?"
Because the fucker was in the military.



in this case ya, the particular case is an exception to the norm, I was just speaking on the general debate about guns in America.

In this particular instance the problem was that he had access to a military base and fire arms, you cant really say that the fact he was willing to kill people based on bad ideas was the problem because he would be a pretty rubbish reserve soldier if that wasnt the case.

Americas way of life is based on mass murder being ok, a vast section of the economy is based around the production of weapons, many millions of jobs, the entire country would go into economic collapse if it stopped taking part in mass murder. If mass murder stops being ok, America falls apart, literally. Given there is little real excuse for mass murder, the situation is that the entire country is run on the principal of mass murder being justified by bullshit. So the situation is that you have to make sure everyone sticks to the same bullshit, you cant attack it from the standpoint of stopping people buying bullshit or stopping people who do joining the army when the entire country is run on a particular flavour of that bullshit.
I love all you people on the forums, we can disagree but still be friends and respect each other :)
"
Snorkle_uk wrote:
Americas way of life is based on mass murder being ok, a vast section of the economy is based around the production of weapons, many millions of jobs, the entire country would go into economic collapse if it stopped taking part in mass murder. If mass murder stops being ok, America falls apart, literally. Given there is little real excuse for mass murder, the situation is that the entire country is run on the principal of mass murder being justified by bullshit.
I'm a veteran of the US Army, and you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info