Multi-Boxing. Finally. The facts.

"

imtheshane wrote:

Secret world doesn't allow multi-boxing yet has bots.

"

imtheshane wrote:

"

valarias wrote:

"

imtheshane wrote:

That's not how it works. You make the claim, you provide proof. You claimed that multiboxing directly contributed to the development of bots and duping. The onus is on you to provide proof.

Unicorns exist and they killed my mother! Prove they didn't. See how ignorant that kind of logic is?

Isn't that what you've been saying this whole time, about how it doesn't affect the economy or ruin the game, but you fail to provide any proof or examples in which any of this is factual, but when the obvious question arises we have to proof an obviously abusive method, is obviously abusive?

congratulations, you've de-leveled from pro-googler to uninformed idiot.

As for the "ban waves" they didn't happen, I just checked the demon buddy forum to confirm, and the first bannings post was july, and they only banned a few accounts, further confirmation would probably be the fact that I was botting at that time for around 24/7 for around 2 weeks by then.

Oh, so we're supposed to take the word of a confirmed botter now? Your way of proving your point involves admitting that you're a dishonest person. Got it.

I've already explained how it doesn't effect the economy. Go reread my earlier posts.

Frankly I'm getting sick of the insults. Either discuss the topic like an adult or bow out.

"

DCDTDito wrote:

WoW
D2
D1
Runescape
GW
TL
All allow multiboxing all have bot some of them have fallen some of them have pretty high chance to fall to the same result of wow/runescape/d1/d2

Point proven.

"

DCDTDito wrote:

Either you buy it or not IDC,some people will buy it (i buy it) those people will complain and those complain could eventualy bring change to your so loved multi-boxing.

I don't need to prove you right i only need to prove the audience right and i would say right now Me > you as you havent provided anything even close to "hazy" to prove me wrong.

"

valarias wrote:

How laughable, regardless what ethically questionable things I've done the proof is in the pudding, go check the demonbuddy forums for yourself if you don't believe me, I grow weary of ignorant children, so from henceforth unless you have a valid point I will simply ignore your droll.

That goes for both of you.

P.S. It's called empirical evidence.

"

DCDTDito wrote:

"

imtheshane wrote:

Secret world doesn't allow multi-boxing yet has bots.

Pretty sure they do BRB il go fetch the 50 page ToS to prove you wrong.

"

imtheshane wrote:

"

valarias wrote:

How laughable, regardless what ethically questionable things I've done the proof is in the pudding, go check the demonbuddy forums for yourself if you don't believe me, I grow weary of ignorant children, so from henceforth unless you have a valid point I will simply ignore your droll.

That goes for both of you.

P.S. It's called empirical evidence.

Really? Where's your data? What did you use as a control group? How many times have your results been independently verified?

The word you're looking for is anecdotal evidence.

"

DCDTDito wrote:

"

DCDTDito wrote:

"

imtheshane wrote:

Secret world doesn't allow multi-boxing yet has bots.

Pretty sure they do BRB il go fetch the 50 page ToS to prove you wrong.

http://forums.thesecretworld.com/showthread.php?t=37662

Not 50 Page ToS but here soem forum information to calm your hungry troll belly while i gather more "proof"

1 to 0

"

imtheshane wrote:

Sorry, I meant Guild Wars 2. But you can keep your point if it makes you feel better.

"

DCDTDito wrote:

WoW
D2
D1
Runescape
GW
TL
All allow multiboxing all have bot some of them have fallen some of them have pretty high chance to fall to the same result of wow/runescape/d1/d2

"

Zalm wrote:

"

imtheshane wrote:

"

valarias wrote:

How laughable, regardless what ethically questionable things I've done the proof is in the pudding, go check the demonbuddy forums for yourself if you don't believe me, I grow weary of ignorant children, so from henceforth unless you have a valid point I will simply ignore your droll.

That goes for both of you.

P.S. It's called empirical evidence.

Really? Where's your data? What did you use as a control group? How many times have your results been independently verified?

The word you're looking for is anecdotal evidence.

Give it up, the hacker lost and so he now decided to rage quit. He doesnt have concrete evidence for any of his 'facts' so he simple walks away. At least he went more mature than to attack us personally....oh wait....he did. Well, more to the point, he lacks evidence.