Multi-Boxing. Finally. The facts.

"
valarias wrote:


Shit just got real.


Hell yeah they did!
Gamertag : DCDT Dito
"
valarias wrote:
"
imtheshane wrote:
"
valarias wrote:
Translation: I have no retort.


You were already proven wrong. There's no need for a retort after that. You were proven wrong and then went on an emotional (and incorrect) rant because you no longer had any logical grounds to stand on.


I was proven wrong how exactly? because they finally had a ban wave only 7 months after the game launch with bots in the first week?

So to be straight because an event occurred after MOST of the players had already left the game and would have essentially no general knowledge of this fine example of anti-cheat, that someone deflects the obvious point that they did NOTHING for 7 months.

Do you know how many people died in Africa today? no because you don't live there.

congratulations you've leveled up past uninformed idiot, to pro-googler.


http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/5740846683

Oh, look, there's a banwave on 6/12/12. A full 5 months before your "7 months after the game". Before calling someone an uninformed idiot, one should make sure one has his own facts correct.
"
DCDTDito wrote:
"
imtheshane wrote:
"
DCDTDito wrote:
Also allowing such pety thing as multi-boxing brought in more skilled hacker program maker and the like in d2 ending in item dupping massive botting that could never be dealt with and even webpage purely dedicated to IRL selling of d2 item.


You seriously just made that up. There is no factual basis behind that statement whatsoever.


Prove me wrong then?


You are the one making ridiculous comments. The onus is on you to prove your statement.

You could just as easily have said "The moon is made of green cheese,. Prove me wrong".

.
"
DCDTDito wrote:
"
imtheshane wrote:
"
DCDTDito wrote:
Also allowing such pety thing as multi-boxing brought in more skilled hacker program maker and the like in d2 ending in item dupping massive botting that could never be dealt with and even webpage purely dedicated to IRL selling of d2 item.


You seriously just made that up. There is no factual basis behind that statement whatsoever.


Prove me wrong then?


That's not how it works. You make the claim, you provide proof. You claimed that multiboxing directly contributed to the development of bots and duping. The onus is on you to provide proof.

Unicorns exist and they killed my mother! Prove they didn't. See how ignorant that kind of logic is?
"
valarias wrote:
I was proven wrong how exactly? because they finally had a ban wave only 7 months after the game launch with bots in the first week?


And ignoring my post wont make it go away. I proved you wrong that there HAS been ban waves. Now I urge you to prove me wrong that that was their first and only ban wave.

"
imtheshane wrote:
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/5740846683

Oh, look, there's a banwave on 6/12/12. A full 5 months before your "7 months after the game". Before calling someone an uninformed idiot, one should make sure one has his own facts correct.


So far...it seems like your argument is becoming more and more invalid.
'It is good to contact a moderator if you feel someone is being a twat' Charan, Forum Moderator

Sometimes, we have to cross a ditch.
Sometimes, we have to cross an ocean.-Rhys, GGG
Last edited by Zalm#4445 on Feb 28, 2013, 11:10:13 PM
"
Zalm wrote:
"
valarias wrote:
I was proven wrong how exactly? because they finally had a ban wave only 7 months after the game launch with bots in the first week?


And ignoring my post wont make it go away. I proved you wrong that there HAS been ban waves. Now I urge you to prove me wrong that that was their first and only ban wave.


Which as I posted above, it wasn't. There was a ban wave on 6/12/12, a full 5 months before the one you posted.
"
imtheshane wrote:
"
Zalm wrote:
"
valarias wrote:
I was proven wrong how exactly? because they finally had a ban wave only 7 months after the game launch with bots in the first week?


And ignoring my post wont make it go away. I proved you wrong that there HAS been ban waves. Now I urge you to prove me wrong that that was their first and only ban wave.


Which as I posted above, it wasn't. There was a ban wave on 6/12/12, a full 5 months before the one you posted.


Got ya on the Edit Rebound...lets tag team this guy till he rage quits!
'It is good to contact a moderator if you feel someone is being a twat' Charan, Forum Moderator

Sometimes, we have to cross a ditch.
Sometimes, we have to cross an ocean.-Rhys, GGG
There are legitimate reasons whether or not multi-boxing should be allowed. There needs to be a rational discussion about it. What doesn't help is the misconceptions about it, and that's what I want cleared up.

My only concern would be Cut-Throat Leagues. That's a real, legitimate concern that would need to be addressed. Everything else is misconceptions and parroting the same incorrect beliefs.
WoW
D2
D1
Runescape
GW
TL
All allow multiboxing all have bot some of them have fallen some of them have pretty high chance to fall to the same result of wow/runescape/d1/d2

Point proven.

I claimed that multiboxing encourage type of player that wanted easy farm to try it and by logical mean one would after assume that automatic > Human thus multiboxing did provide as starting point to aid int he research of how to acquire currency/gold/worthy item more easly even if in illegal manner by first using allowed but highly disregarded manner such as multi-boxing.

Also the it not the how it work way doesn't work with me,i stand by my point and will preach it high to heaven even if it not how it work,you must prove me wrong not i must prove you right.
Gamertag : DCDT Dito
"
imtheshane wrote:

That's not how it works. You make the claim, you provide proof. You claimed that multiboxing directly contributed to the development of bots and duping. The onus is on you to provide proof.

Unicorns exist and they killed my mother! Prove they didn't. See how ignorant that kind of logic is?


Isn't that what you've been saying this whole time, about how it doesn't affect the economy or ruin the game, but you fail to provide any proof or examples in which any of this is factual, but when the obvious question arises we have to proof an obviously abusive method, is obviously abusive?

congratulations, you've de-leveled from pro-googler to uninformed idiot.

As for the "ban waves" they didn't happen, I just checked the demon buddy forum to confirm, and the first bannings post was july, and they only banned a few accounts, further confirmation would probably be the fact that I was botting at that time for around 24/7 for around 2 weeks by then.
Last edited by valarias#5872 on Feb 28, 2013, 11:19:38 PM

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info