Whoever designed Jaws of Agony
What I don't understand here is: people pay money to help GGG and make their own unique which they try their design visions on. Why the heck do you tell that those items are 'shit' or 'useless'? Obviously the people who made them like how they turned out and there are many others who like them too. So unless you only want Kaom and Shavronne items to exist you better get ready to hand out heaps of money. If you don't like the item, just don't play with it.
That said, kudos to the creator of the item. It looks fantastic and has some nice concept. Can't wait to find it to make a bear trapper :D Unarmed for life! (although I do like maces too recently)
|
![]() |
" It's called people being dicks on the internet. Very wide spread around here :D GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
![]() |
" *240 Also, Vaal it ;) GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
![]() |
*edit*
forget what I said, whoever said in the wiki that using multiple traps gem did not increase the chance of getting power charges did not explain that you would roll get a chance to get a power charge for every single one of those 3 traps. My conclusion is that by using multiple trap, even if only using one trap kind, it's not even hard to keep up the power charges. Last edited by MRLoki#0433 on Jun 2, 2014, 12:06:43 PM
|
![]() |
" Might as well be that missing zero. Useless mods are useless. Last edited by tinko92#6447 on Jun 2, 2014, 1:15:46 PM
|
![]() |
15% to gain power charge is too low to be interesting.
IGN TylordRampage
|
![]() |
" it sure was too low when I was testing without multiple trap, but, with multiple trap, you can even get 3 power charges at once. If your character is using 2 traps with multiple trap + bear trap from shield, you can easily keep the power charges capped while fighting. I'm still planning how I'll make the build, but I'm pretty sure going for multiple traps all the way. |
![]() |