POE or Torchlight II > Diablo III?

"
PunkyF00l wrote:
I personally think Blizzard really uses Diablo III just to earn money. From the gameplay that I saw it's nothing compared to Diablo II, PoE or Torchlight II (gameplay). Even the graphics of this fantastic game are better! This game is really promising and it's free to play! If some more people would know this game, Diablo III loses his throne.
What? Blizzard is trying to make money off Diablo 3!? You, sir, are mad!
"
Starwulf wrote:
"
xodor wrote:
Diablo 3>Diablo 2>Titan Quest
then maybe torchlight and pof


Close: I'd Make it Diablo 2 > Titan quest > Diablo 3(just because I disagree with some of their decisions, and their incredible arrogance towards those with slower internet connections like myself(26.4k dial-up). Depending on how good POE is, it may or may not edge out Diablo 3. Torchlight and Torchlight 2 are at the bottom of my list, I can't stand the graphical style of Torchlight, and the item finding in it stinks: Oh look, I found *Insert set item name here* 30 levels later: Oh look, I found EPIC *Insert same set item name as above*. Same for unique items as well. I can't count how many unique items I found, then found again with the prefix "Epic" in front of it >< To damn lazy to even make different names for their items, or different stats either. The quests were pretty horrid as well, and the end-boss was pure shit >< Nothing more then a "Pack 100 heal potions, and spend the next 20 minutes grinding his health down" thing. BORING.

Sacred 2 is somewhere in the middle I'd say.


Arrogance? Why should Blizzard simplify their product for such a miniscule percentage of their market share?
I'd be surprised if any modern online game worked with a connection that slow.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info