"
Blackey wrote:
"
killbilly wrote:
"
Blackey wrote:
As a new player and ranger main, I wouldn't complain if there were no timers. The enjoyment of competition of no timers would more than compensate for the 'unfairness' with latency and range.
Put your fleshlights away and pay attention.
But if there must be timers, definitely take these carebears' name off of them, because I'm going to be taking the slow neckbeards' loot regardless.
Also, filter 'no ninja' out of game names, imo. It's an embarrassment to the game to see the game list covered with it.
community is trying to fix their game....the FFA system is an embarrassment to the game NOT they way community is try to "fix" it....
if loot system was perfect then noone would try to fix it, thus no need for a 800pages thread and half the party noticeboard stating "loot rules"
get some facts straight please
This is 800 pages of carebears trying to turn this game into diablo 3, and true ballers trying to defend it, nothing more. Get your facts straight, please.
discriminating based on latency is regionally biased and suggestive of pay 2 win except only a portion of the population is even able to purchase such a connection (no FiOS available where I live for example). Ballers as you describe are just ninjas, but maybe thats why you were exiled here.
|
|
"
slyme wrote:
discriminating based on latency is regionally biased and suggestive of pay 2 win except only a portion of the population is even able to purchase such a connection (no FiOS available where I live for example). Ballers as you describe are just ninjas, but maybe thats why you were exiled here.
You could play alone if latency is an issue. That solves alot of issues.
Besides, NINJAs don't exist in this game. Its a fact.
Its perfectly clear that anyone who even thinks about using that term is clueless to what the game is meant to be. So, why should anything else they say be taken seriously?
Last edited by Vooodu#7002 on Mar 13, 2013, 2:25:13 PM
|
Posted byVooodu#7002on Mar 13, 2013, 2:24:26 PM
|
"
slyme wrote:
discriminating based on latency is regionally biased and suggestive of pay 2 win except only a portion of the population is even able to purchase such a connection (no FiOS available where I live for example). Ballers as you describe are just ninjas, but maybe thats why you were exiled here.
FPS games, the ones where it really matters, don't do anything about it. Why should PoE? I agree that it sucks when you have a higher latency, but don't go changing the game over it. You don't have to play in groups.
|
Posted byBlackey#6345on Mar 13, 2013, 2:27:38 PM
|
"
Blackey wrote:
"
slyme wrote:
discriminating based on latency is regionally biased and suggestive of pay 2 win except only a portion of the population is even able to purchase such a connection (no FiOS available where I live for example). Ballers as you describe are just ninjas, but maybe thats why you were exiled here.
FPS games, the ones where it really matters, don't do anything about it. Why should PoE? I agree that it sucks when you have a higher latency, but don't go changing the game over it. You don't have to play in groups.
is the game for you combat or looting or both? because I signed up for an action RPG not a FPS or click race.
|
|
"
Blackey wrote:
This is 800 pages of carebears trying to turn this game into diablo 3, and true ballers trying to defend it, nothing more. Get your facts straight, please.
Just another example of a brainwashed cultist who thinks clicking is competition and on top of it he think he's hardcore at that.
Comedy at its best ;)
|
Posted bymobutu#5362on Mar 13, 2013, 2:35:38 PM
|
"
slyme wrote:
"
Blackey wrote:
"
slyme wrote:
discriminating based on latency is regionally biased and suggestive of pay 2 win except only a portion of the population is even able to purchase such a connection (no FiOS available where I live for example). Ballers as you describe are just ninjas, but maybe thats why you were exiled here.
FPS games, the ones where it really matters, don't do anything about it. Why should PoE? I agree that it sucks when you have a higher latency, but don't go changing the game over it. You don't have to play in groups.
is the game for you combat or looting or both? because I signed up for an action RPG not a FPS or click race.
You shouldn't have picked such a hardcore title then, or should just stay out of multiplayer.
|
Posted byBlackey#6345on Mar 13, 2013, 2:36:20 PM
|
"
Blackey wrote:
"
killbilly wrote:
"
Blackey wrote:
As a new player and ranger main, I wouldn't complain if there were no timers. The enjoyment of competition of no timers would more than compensate for the 'unfairness' with latency and range.
Put your fleshlights away and pay attention.
But if there must be timers, definitely take these carebears' name off of them, because I'm going to be taking the slow neckbeards' loot regardless.
Also, filter 'no ninja' out of game names, imo. It's an embarrassment to the game to see the game list covered with it.
community is trying to fix their game....the FFA system is an embarrassment to the game NOT they way community is try to "fix" it....
if loot system was perfect then noone would try to fix it, thus no need for a 800pages thread and half the party noticeboard stating "loot rules"
get some facts straight please
This is 800 pages of carebears trying to turn this game into diablo 3, and true ballers trying to defend it, nothing more. Get your facts straight, please.
talk more non sense please
if your fact and line of FFA defence is that we are carebears and we want to turn that into d3 i will have to remind you that no matter what you believe chief developer says
"
Chris wrote:
Several legitimate problems with free-for-all looting were raised:
- Ranged players are unable to get to the items in time.
- Items might just get scooped up by one player with substantially lower latency than the other players.
What do you guys think about this suggestion? Please don't just post "allocated sucks", or "I won't play if it's free-for-all".
now get some facts, cause for the devs we are not carebears but we have LEGITIMATE problems.....
When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself
|
Posted bykillbilly#2346on Mar 13, 2013, 2:56:36 PM
|
"
Blackey wrote:
You shouldn't have picked such a hardcore title then, or should just stay out of multiplayer.
can you define hardcore please? are you playing in scrubcore league?
do you have brain to use ?
i have to remind you since you are clueless that PoE is the easiest game and a complete faceroll for a party with friends...and you do not fight for loot with your friends and the mobs do not scale in %dmg with more people....win win if you have friends the problem is in the public groups ONLY.
When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself
|
Posted bykillbilly#2346on Mar 13, 2013, 2:59:23 PM
|
"
Blackey wrote:
You shouldn't have picked such a hardcore title then, or should just stay out of multiplayer.
Co-op is easy mode. If you want to play hardcore play solo.
IGN: Wrathmar * Paulie * Client
|
Posted bywrathmar#4456on Mar 13, 2013, 3:10:53 PM
|
"
Blackey wrote:
This is 800 pages of carebears trying to turn this game into diablo 3, and true ballers trying to defend it, nothing more. Get your facts straight, please.
It's actually 800 pages of feedback and constructive criticism. See page 1. Get your facts straight; please.
IGN: Mibuwolf
|
Posted bymibuwolf#7946on Mar 13, 2013, 3:20:54 PM
|
