Steam is going balistic

"

Mashgesture#2912 wrote:

First 4 negative reviews actually say nothing constructive.

One of them is a 1k hour player that says the game sucks...


Seeing a bunch of salt around not having broken .1 builds anymore....


Someone saying a build requires 100 divines....


Whining about mage builds being dead.... no you just dont know how to build anything without broken archmage and grim feast....


honestly 99% of these seem to just be whining/vulgarity/knowledge issues and not an indicator of anything.

its wild, ppl with 500+ hours giving negative review for a game thats in early access, why spend 500 hours playing a game you hate?

Did not say fun beta. Somehow I felt addressed.

"

raV#3445 wrote:

"

Mashgesture#2912 wrote:

First 4 negative reviews actually say nothing constructive.

One of them is a 1k hour player that says the game sucks...


Seeing a bunch of salt around not having broken .1 builds anymore....


Someone saying a build requires 100 divines....


Whining about mage builds being dead.... no you just dont know how to build anything without broken archmage and grim feast....


honestly 99% of these seem to just be whining/vulgarity/knowledge issues and not an indicator of anything.

its wild, ppl with 500+ hours giving negative review for a game thats in early access, why spend 500 hours playing a game you hate?

Oh, that is a good one. Funny puny humans, ehh? Sometimes it takes you just that time to have a saying, I guess? Ppl are wild.

"

LiMA6#0387 wrote:

with so many recent negative reviews, not sure why we still have denialists.

Because science.

We need a new Timmy!

"

kosmo_blacksmith#5449 wrote:

"

raV#3445 wrote:

"

Mashgesture#2912 wrote:

First 4 negative reviews actually say nothing constructive.

One of them is a 1k hour player that says the game sucks...


Seeing a bunch of salt around not having broken .1 builds anymore....


Someone saying a build requires 100 divines....


Whining about mage builds being dead.... no you just dont know how to build anything without broken archmage and grim feast....


honestly 99% of these seem to just be whining/vulgarity/knowledge issues and not an indicator of anything.

its wild, ppl with 500+ hours giving negative review for a game thats in early access, why spend 500 hours playing a game you hate?

Oh, that is a good one. Funny puny humans, ehh? Sometimes it takes you just that time to have a saying, I guess? Ppl are wild.

Also ppl are trying to make it work...when you encounter smth you dislike for the first time, any good player searches the mistake on himself at first, trying to avoid the same thing from happening again, changing their builds or simply playstyle, trying to adapt, figuring there must be something I just havent realized yet in the game. But if that turns out to not be there after really trying hard for hundreds of hours then yeah at some point you voice your criticism. Voicing it after 5h when you got destroyed by an act boss would not make your opinion very weightful....

Well if it was people with 5 hours making the reviews you would disregard it by saying he/she has not played enough . Funny
I think someone who invested hundreds of hours into playing can have a much more valid feedback about the game .
And i see absolutely nothing wrong or contradictory with disliking something after you have been liking it for a time .

People will just find any reason to invalidate someone's review, whether the reviewer has spent 5 hours or 1000 hours in game. There is always two sides, but it's funnier to me when people do nothing but white-knight for an early access game (in between mapping on lightning spear) lmao.

"

Lunela#2182 wrote:

People will just find any reason to invalidate someone's review, whether the reviewer has spent 5 hours or 1000 hours in game. There is always two sides, but it's funnier to me when people do nothing but white-knight for an early access game (in between mapping on lightning spear) lmao.

I don't know. Someone with 500 hours game time leaving a simple review "it sucks" seems funnier to me but to each his own i guess.

GGG has a luxory problem by people with 500+ hours writing negative reviews. It means that there is a base for the game that people want to play and enjoy and that can be fixed.

Any game company that receives no reviews at all or bad reviews after 0.2 hours has much bigger problems on their hand.