Kripp's New Video - Phys. Damage Suxx In This Game

"

Boem wrote:

"

And here's the kicker.... these transition points NEVER OCCUR if you are using elemental damage.

How nice one sentence to prove why physical damage wil always be better then elemental damage endgame <3

Btw the gem in kripps video was lvl 13...0 qaulity if ure interested (because it would give 100%as so its easy maths)

Armor formula makes physical damage OP, just look at vaal smash and "boulders" (i believe they are physical damage aswell)
xD

Vaal smash is 50% physical and 50% fire. Since you bring that up it means you agree that going physical with + elemental is the best!! Thanks :)

As long as the phys isn't being converted. Yes. If it is converted, no.

But he used a made up AR amount, as well as not using the % increased melee dmg. With flicker MS and splash. I get +180% melee phys , as well as 125% dmg effectiveness.

@ riptide

Vaals smash is 100% physical converted to 50% fire :'),

On the other hand the only way people have "tanked" vaals smash on mercilles is with imortal call and high fire resis, they stil get a shitload of damage but they survive, considering they lost about 95% hp trying that(i dont remember the video/data correctly, but im sure u can find it on youtube) u could imagine how the armor formula would work on that other 50% physical damage if he dident use imortal call. Considering the fire damage 50% is flat reduced, and the physical wont be <.o

Clearly a 100% physical hit would be triple as devastating as a 50/50% hit.

Some food for thought, just because i like this thread so far...