Sorry, too much too read, but that's utter nonsense.
Of course D2 had a BIG singleplayer community, which alse , especially in the first 5-8 years, made a lot of single-player mods, too.
Meridian was SP first, if i rem,ember correctly, i think i somewhere have some 50 pages of printed manuals from Diablo2.net or sthg...
When D2 came out, there was no cable in Europe most of the playe4rs still got 56k modem or ISDN, and there even was no Internet Flat most of the time,that all jhust began 2002, when several "small" companies made flatrate-provision.
so no, D2 was not "multiplayer" in form of "playing together" most of the times for many players, but at max you went online to trade or have some chat.
Ofcourse there was a MP Community, and Leagues and stuff prove, it flourished, too.
But to say "there was no d2 SP community" or "D2 was not a SP game... Thats utter nonsense, sorry.
|
Posted byGorathan#4740on Sep 16, 2021, 5:51:25 AM
|
For the record, I wasn't suggesting to turn the game into a big title mmorpg. However I'd rather play a Diablo 2 themed Ragnarok Online, than a Baldurs gate.
20vs20 group pvp updates (for the main game, not royal). Siege vs siege maps. Randomized & shuffled passive trees. Bigger trees +30 point updates.
Large towns hosting 100+ people; bard taverns. A field near town for guild events. Not hideouts like WoW-Garrisons. Outside like Ragnarok Online. Last edited by PrairieTutanka#3123 on Sep 17, 2021, 1:09:57 AM
|
|
"
PrairieTutanka wrote:
I'd rather play a Diablo 2 themed Ragnarok Online, than a Baldurs gate.
I liked Baldur's Gate but I don't even know what Ragnarok Online was. (Yes, I understand Google exists, but I don't wanna.)
I think the reality is this:
1. The people who would pick Baldur's Gate instead, most likely greatly outnumber you.
2. I don't think it's feasible anymore for a game to try to do both things. The competition is too fierce to realistically be a first pick for both subgenres. Therefore, the developer would need to choose.
Now, both of those are definitely hypotheses, not proven/known facts. Maybe a lot of people are like "hell yeah Ragnarok Online!" and unbeknownst to me I've been living under a rock this whole time. Maybe Chris Wilson will unlock Ultra RNGesus mode and somehow magic into our reality a PoE2 with great single player, skilltesting PvP and state of the art rollback netcode. But I don't believe in any of that.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
|
Posted byScrotieMcB#2697on Sep 17, 2021, 2:16:57 AM
|
It'd be a field like this from Ragnarok Online.
1 portal next to town, hosting 100+ people town channels (GGG has had enough funds for this for years now, if 2005's Guild Wars 1 can do it) > Which beats WoW Garrison styled hide-outs.
For hanging outside with guilds or anyone > this is better than 10 stash panners, bailing from town asap:
https://youtu.be/-vBkahECx8w
Than War of Emperium Ragnarok, which looks chaotic, tho still better than nothing. For 40vs40vs40vs40 guild vs guild vs guild vs guild, castle siege maps:
https://youtu.be/H00xIsDzMeQ
Group arena pvp as good or better than Lost Ark. That isn't Royal, but for the main game:
https://youtu.be/eksDt1IjsRQ
Or Lost Ark's Guild vs Guild maps:
https://youtu.be/ZXXCaPlMvpM
All of this is popular & had / has an audience.
Without the botters from Ragnarok Online (meaning GGG would need new anti cheat software per client launch) & without the P2W model from Lost Ark.
20vs20 group pvp updates (for the main game, not royal). Siege vs siege maps. Randomized & shuffled passive trees. Bigger trees +30 point updates.
Large towns hosting 100+ people; bard taverns. A field near town for guild events. Not hideouts like WoW-Garrisons. Outside like Ragnarok Online. Last edited by PrairieTutanka#3123 on Sep 17, 2021, 5:40:04 PM
|
|
"
PrairieTutanka wrote:
The replies have been good. So I don't want to get too wild with my responses. I still wish their was more variety to the POE scene. Or variety to the type of person who scouts these forums. Tho it seems PVE'ers ran off " variety " long ago.
:) To the guy who asked about PVE-Andy lol. It's a term Asmon uses, to describe a generic fashion-dresser, when having a costume content. A " Fire-lands Andy ". I only started using it for pve'ers, when being outnumbered on a previous pvp thread.
On a silly off-topic note. I was watching a Chris stream with like 6 top POE streamers. They were all dressed in black, half with glasses, & black hair. They all looked like metal heads, who worked at a library. After that, I'm guessing that's what solo pve'rs dress like. ha.
The Ultima online response was refreshing. I was like " finally a fellow pvper! yeaaasss! " than it got to the end & the guy believes some mediocre slogan of core game mechanics being ruined, which I don't share that sentiment.
The Ultima online example, doesn't say to me, " hey adding more content to the game ruined it ", it just says to me " PVE'ers ruined it ". Which is essentially what's happening with POE now in my opinion. PVE'ers are holding this game back, big time. However I know not everyone agrees with that, so touche.
I will be downloading Final Fantasy for social aspects, yet that game has no pvp, so pvpers don't have a game to go to right now. I'll still want social updates + pvp updates for POE, no matter what mmorpg I play. Because I'll still have characters invested in POE, that I'll want to talk to other players, or test these builds against (when online).
I can tell these POE forums, have a lot of mmorpg novices. Only mmorpg novices would want to separate these aspects from this game. You will say otherwise & tell me how you play mmorpg's too, but I'll still believe this.
POE holds my interest for 1 year, with pve-only content, than I'll move to a new game, maybe even sooner. Than I'll give it another 3 years if they add social town updates, & another 3 years if they add pvp updates.
To the guy talking about his wife playing & waiting for her 2 mins in town, driving him crazy. Well that's what wrong with the parties of this game. For new players or any player really, it's just some rapid rush, of having to keep up with some guy rushing rooms, like sonic the hedgehog. Diablo 2's party system, when I played it during its prime years, had rushing, but not as bad as POE's is. The pace was still pleasant, after you teleported to your skipped Act. So ye behaving as if 2 minutes in town is too long, while wanting to skip through zones, as fast as you can = really explains why the party system needs work. Or town experience. The game has zero social aspects, 10 people panning through a stash, then bailing, every time = the town experience. No amount of playing other mmorpg's, is going to make me not want that altered for the better (when I do hop on POE). Thus bigger towns, population size, & more events in town. While making guilds hangout in town / not hideouts.
I've already written my opinions about how pvp balances pve, 100%. On my topic, " Why do mobile games have better pvp than poe, or games with less cash shop funding or playerbase?". Even if they have to re-work defense scaling, against the dps 1 shot antics. So yeah, in my opinion, without having to go into detail again; PVP exposes item imbalances, exposes the top 1% builds, balances all of that, & balances range vs melee as well.
Silent majority or minority, I'm bored with the league talks. I'll skip through 2 hours of an interview, wishing they'd talk about anything else. Bigger skill trees? Nope. Randomized skill trees? Nope. Bigger social towns? Nope. Group PVP siege maps? Nope. Fun events not segregated to a side mode? Nope. Anything else other than end-game pve discussion? Nope. *yawns*
I still believe this community uses these words or excuses too much, when describing a variety of content: " Too hard, impossible, not possible, unlikely, how will they this, how will they that? " I really wait for the guy who's pro positive on this matter & just blatantly says, " JUST DO IT! ". Sure beats writing a thesis paper on why all these things are possible.
Honestly I'd like to see 20 more threads that have nothing to do with PVE. Or at least nothing to do with endgame pve or items as much. Doesn't have to be pvp related or social related, but anything else would be sweet. If you don't have the content to talk about other stuff, than talk about not having the content. & vote toward it.
Besides the technical aspects of how they have turned a single player game, into a multiplayer game, & the updates needed to turn it into a MMO next. Besides that. It seems many are stuck in the past, regardless of the topic at hand.
How about you don't try to argue with other people on what they should or should not enjoy doing.
I hate this Gatekeeper shit. I can just picture you swiping your bangs out of your eyes as you type self righteously.
I don't even care about SP or MP but as sure as shit wont let ANYONE tell me HOW I am enjoying a game wrong.
You're like that one douche bag at a punk show who is pointing out the poseurs for liking the wrong band, a band you just happen to hate.
Taste is subjective my friend and you don't get to dictate what is fun to others. Why you are so bent up on what other think and how they play is fucking beyond me but its obvious that the lockdown has turned you into a full blown Karen.
EDIT:
For the record, In 1999, Baldur's Gate won the Origins Award for Best Role Playing Computer Game of 1998, not to mention "Voted Best" in many PC gaming mags at the time. This just goes to show that you are putting your own opinions and bias down as fact when it comes to gaming.
The ONLY reason you think BG wasn't popular (in the late 90's when most peoples first access to multiplayer games, PC's and the internet was collage!)is because YOU didn't like it.
Wait, how old where you BG even came out?
Last edited by VomitChrist#5726 on Sep 17, 2021, 9:18:03 PM
|
Posted byVomitChrist#5726on Sep 17, 2021, 9:05:58 PM
|
I don't see the point of this post tbh.
Multiplayer in D2 was something fresh and innovative at the time but single player also mattered a lot.
It wasn't 100 or 0 like that.
|
Posted byGordyne#2944on Sep 17, 2021, 9:20:18 PM
|
"
VomitChrist wrote:
"
PrairieTutanka wrote:
The replies have been good. So I don't want to get too wild with my responses. I still wish their was more variety to the POE scene. Or variety to the type of person who scouts these forums. Tho it seems PVE'ers ran off " variety " long ago.
:) To the guy who asked about PVE-Andy lol. It's a term Asmon uses, to describe a generic fashion-dresser, when having a costume content. A " Fire-lands Andy ". I only started using it for pve'ers, when being outnumbered on a previous pvp thread.
On a silly off-topic note. I was watching a Chris stream with like 6 top POE streamers. They were all dressed in black, half with glasses, & black hair. They all looked like metal heads, who worked at a library. After that, I'm guessing that's what solo pve'rs dress like. ha.
The Ultima online response was refreshing. I was like " finally a fellow pvper! yeaaasss! " than it got to the end & the guy believes some mediocre slogan of core game mechanics being ruined, which I don't share that sentiment.
The Ultima online example, doesn't say to me, " hey adding more content to the game ruined it ", it just says to me " PVE'ers ruined it ". Which is essentially what's happening with POE now in my opinion. PVE'ers are holding this game back, big time. However I know not everyone agrees with that, so touche.
I will be downloading Final Fantasy for social aspects, yet that game has no pvp, so pvpers don't have a game to go to right now. I'll still want social updates + pvp updates for POE, no matter what mmorpg I play. Because I'll still have characters invested in POE, that I'll want to talk to other players, or test these builds against (when online).
I can tell these POE forums, have a lot of mmorpg novices. Only mmorpg novices would want to separate these aspects from this game. You will say otherwise & tell me how you play mmorpg's too, but I'll still believe this.
POE holds my interest for 1 year, with pve-only content, than I'll move to a new game, maybe even sooner. Than I'll give it another 3 years if they add social town updates, & another 3 years if they add pvp updates.
To the guy talking about his wife playing & waiting for her 2 mins in town, driving him crazy. Well that's what wrong with the parties of this game. For new players or any player really, it's just some rapid rush, of having to keep up with some guy rushing rooms, like sonic the hedgehog. Diablo 2's party system, when I played it during its prime years, had rushing, but not as bad as POE's is. The pace was still pleasant, after you teleported to your skipped Act. So ye behaving as if 2 minutes in town is too long, while wanting to skip through zones, as fast as you can = really explains why the party system needs work. Or town experience. The game has zero social aspects, 10 people panning through a stash, then bailing, every time = the town experience. No amount of playing other mmorpg's, is going to make me not want that altered for the better (when I do hop on POE). Thus bigger towns, population size, & more events in town. While making guilds hangout in town / not hideouts.
I've already written my opinions about how pvp balances pve, 100%. On my topic, " Why do mobile games have better pvp than poe, or games with less cash shop funding or playerbase?". Even if they have to re-work defense scaling, against the dps 1 shot antics. So yeah, in my opinion, without having to go into detail again; PVP exposes item imbalances, exposes the top 1% builds, balances all of that, & balances range vs melee as well.
Silent majority or minority, I'm bored with the league talks. I'll skip through 2 hours of an interview, wishing they'd talk about anything else. Bigger skill trees? Nope. Randomized skill trees? Nope. Bigger social towns? Nope. Group PVP siege maps? Nope. Fun events not segregated to a side mode? Nope. Anything else other than end-game pve discussion? Nope. *yawns*
I still believe this community uses these words or excuses too much, when describing a variety of content: " Too hard, impossible, not possible, unlikely, how will they this, how will they that? " I really wait for the guy who's pro positive on this matter & just blatantly says, " JUST DO IT! ". Sure beats writing a thesis paper on why all these things are possible.
Honestly I'd like to see 20 more threads that have nothing to do with PVE. Or at least nothing to do with endgame pve or items as much. Doesn't have to be pvp related or social related, but anything else would be sweet. If you don't have the content to talk about other stuff, than talk about not having the content. & vote toward it.
Besides the technical aspects of how they have turned a single player game, into a multiplayer game, & the updates needed to turn it into a MMO next. Besides that. It seems many are stuck in the past, regardless of the topic at hand.
How about you don't try to argue with other people on what they should or should not enjoy doing.
I hate this Gatekeeper shit. I can just picture you swiping your bangs out of your eyes as you type self righteously.
I don't even care about SP or MP but as sure as shit wont let ANYONE tell me HOW I am enjoying a game wrong.
You're like that one douche bag at a punk show who is pointing out the poseurs for liking the wrong band, a band you just happen to hate.
Taste is subjective my friend and you don't get to dictate what is fun to others. Why you are so bent up on what other think and how they play is fucking beyond me but its obvious that the lockdown has turned you into a full blown Karen.
EDIT:
For the record, In 1999, Baldur's Gate won the Origins Award for Best Role Playing Computer Game of 1998, not to mention "Voted Best" in many PC gaming mags at the time. This just goes to show that you are putting your own opinions and bias down as fact when it comes to gaming.
The ONLY reason you think BG wasn't popular (in the late 90's when most peoples first access to multiplayer games, PC's and the internet was collage!)is because YOU didn't like it.
Wait, how old where you BG even came out?
The irony to be called a gatekeeper, when PVE'ers have told me to go play League of Legends for pvp content, smh. To be called a gatekeeper, while solo pve'rs brush any other style of content under the rugg. Get outta here with that.
I don't even have a attitude anymore toward this topic. Tho when I did, it was clearly defense from all the generic pve'ers, replying to my previous pvp thread. Ones that would try to act like their talking for the whole community.
Tho saying what my preference is for the further updates to this game, is in no way suggesting others have to believe it. Obviously I already know what page they are on. It's funny you brought up punk rock show, because that's what many of the POE top streamers dress like. They wear black, they aren't colorful like mmorpg players. So I wouldn't know.
I don't know why I'm replying to a guy named Vomitmouth, talking about honor, when 90% of your paragraph is just complaining. Without even addressing many of the points made. Besides trying to defend Baldurs Gate, which awards or not, most mmorpg players didn't play it for a reason. Glad some hermit pve'ers did? *surprised pikachu face*
I still don't understand why someone would buy a pc, for single player games, instead of a console, but hey I won't judge anymore. I'll let you figure that out. It just seems extra nerdy, unnecessarily nerdy. I suppose. To each their own. I guess Witcher 3 was alright. Bout it.
However you ranted when the conversation already simmered down, so kinda missed the opportunity many pages ago. Nowhere in here does someone say anything about " having to do anything ", so I don't get where that's come from. However it is a discussion on passionate preferences sure, amidst 1,000 generic threads about lategame pve, that already exist. So weigh that out 1st.
P.s. MMORPG-PVP players aren't playing Royal. Moba players are, big difference. Mmmorpg players want to use their main chars or alts, not use a side mode. None of the games listed above, put pvp in a side mode. Some kinda do, by not allowing your items to matter (not a fan of that either, unless items are OP / need balancing). But all of them still allow you to use your main chars.
P.s.s & to all those who believe single player Diablo 2 was equally as popular as Battle.net Diablo 2, even if you played single player. I still don't agree. I personally never met anyone from school who played single player. They didn't share characters on the list. Most people only had time for 1 or the other. I believe more people played Battle.net at the end of the day. Especially since it was at a time, toward the rise of the internet. Especially since many transitioned to WoW afterwards.
20vs20 group pvp updates (for the main game, not royal). Siege vs siege maps. Randomized & shuffled passive trees. Bigger trees +30 point updates.
Large towns hosting 100+ people; bard taverns. A field near town for guild events. Not hideouts like WoW-Garrisons. Outside like Ragnarok Online. Last edited by PrairieTutanka#3123 on Sep 17, 2021, 11:49:33 PM
|
Posted byPrairieTutanka#3123on Sep 17, 2021, 11:09:31 PM
|
Diablo 2 was great game. When it came out. I love when people praise Diablo 2 to the heavens like its the best game ever made, while they didnt play it for past 10 years and are looking at it with nostalgia googles.
|
Posted byAynix#7757on Sep 18, 2021, 5:48:23 AMOn Probation
|
"
Aynix wrote:
Diablo 2 was great game. When it came out. I love when people praise Diablo 2 to the heavens like its the best game ever made, while they didnt play it for past 10 years and are looking at it with nostalgia googles.
It's possible to like D2 for what it was, and not feel the need to compare it to games of today. The games of today benefit from the innovation and lessons learned from games of the past.
I think D2R will do well for a few weeks, but the limited end game and no new content will quickly catch up to it. A new paint job can't fix either of those two things.
I'm struggling to stick to my original assessment that it's not worth the price tag since it's basically the same game. I might finish my 40/40 this week and just take the plunge until 3.16 comes.
Thanks for all the fish!
|
Posted byNubatron#4333on Sep 18, 2021, 6:59:02 AM
|
lol? d2 single player mode was best
multiplay kill it
Mercenaries master craft service Mercenaries My IGN TreeOfDead
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2037371 Vouch
Mercenaries veiled crafting all service all crafts mods
Mercenaries SC master craft service Mercenaries SC craft mod!
Veiled crafting Service Settlers craft PM: TreeOfDead
|
Posted byTreeOfDead#4438on Sep 18, 2021, 2:04:21 PM
|