Aura Stacking Might Be Broken

"

xMustard wrote:

"

yamface wrote:

Every aura stacker starts out as a completely different build.

corrected that for you

as you say, you CONVERT into aura stacking. precisely, you do.

Every witch starts as selfcast fireball and convert to a completely different skill later on, therefore there are no real working non-failed witch builds other than selfcast fireball.

No one is wrong in this argument. The general consensus is that aurastackers only start getting real strong at >40ex of investment. So at that point, what difference does 100 regret orbs (including 20 for reversing ascendancies) make? Hence, the notion that you can start as any ascendant build :)

Hasn’t stopped GGG before. I hope GGG does nuke from orbit so everyone can lose several thousand exalts worth of gear in one fell swoop like many of us have countless times before.

"

TheAshmaker wrote:

Hasn’t stopped GGG before. I hope GGG does nuke from orbit so everyone can lose several thousand exalts worth of gear in one fell swoop like many of us have countless times before.

You can "lose thousands of exalts" only if you play standard.

"

cyberthopp wrote:

Every witch starts as selfcast fireball and convert to a completely different skill later on, therefore there are no real working non-failed witch builds other than selfcast fireball.

yup, precisely. every witch is a failed build because you can't use your main skill as soon as your start the character. exactly right

im constantly reminded why i should stop visiting these forums but i guess im a glutton.
[Removed by Support]

"

yamface wrote:

"

xMustard wrote:

it isn't like im opposed to changes, but when you change key uniques, jewels, and entire skills....you're a different build.

...

The change to ci is more drastic than a regular build changing to a LL aurastacker. So again by your logic all ci builds also fail.

Oh btw aurastacker has more skill diversity than regular ci builds. So when you say "oh, ci", it's even more retarded to say "oh, aurastacker" if you ask him what skill he's playing.

[Removed by Support]

"

6_din_49 wrote:

"

TheAshmaker wrote:

Hasn’t stopped GGG before. I hope GGG does nuke from orbit so everyone can lose several thousand exalts worth of gear in one fell swoop like many of us have countless times before.

You can "lose thousands of exalts" only if you play standard.

Not true. If you look at the top end heist aura stackers they are easily several k ex.

LOL welp cya later

"

xMustard wrote:

text

Do you know why it's so hard to follow you on anything you say? You literally change your definitions as you go along.

First you tell us league start means your first character.

Oh but I really mean this gets converted to that so it doesn't count anymore.

Oh but actually it means it takes too much investment.

If you could kindly stop with the no true scottsman bs maybe you'll get a real discussion rolling. If I were you though, I'd choose not to continue solely because it's blatantly obvious you're arguing with full ignorance on what aurastackers are and how they work.

"

Faendris wrote:

"

6_din_49 wrote:

"

TheAshmaker wrote:

Hasn’t stopped GGG before. I hope GGG does nuke from orbit so everyone can lose several thousand exalts worth of gear in one fell swoop like many of us have countless times before.

You can "lose thousands of exalts" only if you play standard.

Not true. If you look at the top end heist aura stackers they are easily several k ex.

Which would be nerfed at the end of the league, when their gear will be usable only in standard. By then, we wont care about the gear we used in Heist anymore.

"

6_din_49 wrote:

Which would be nerfed at the end of the league, when their gear will be usable only in standard. By then, we wont care about the gear we used in Heist anymore.

OK, I rarely have to say this: you are right and I was wrong :). I do not agree with you last sentence but that is irrelevant to the main point.