Spectre chest insanity.
...yeah, it's like that was acknowledged or something.
REPEATEDLY. FACT: the game is balanced around trade. FACT: you're adding imposed restrictions (self found). FACT: your entire premise is predicated on this elective restriction - that the game is explicitly NOT balanced around. FACT: hundreds of these are on poe.trade. anyone can just make a mouse click and ctrl+v and get one. your entire argument implies that many uniques (esp top tier, ie: shav's, kaom's, inpulsa, etc) should drop way more - as people aren't likely to have one drop in months, either. and those wanting a specific unique for a build and have a self-imposed no-trade restriction... [Removed by Support]
"Your forum signature was removed as it was considered to be inappropriate and a breach of our Code of Conduct." ...it was quotes. from the forum. lolz! |
![]() |
" " " " " " " At no point was i talking about Solo-Self-Found/SSF If i were i would have used the proper terms, Please stop bringing this up page after page. I never said any of those (what you consider) top tier uniques should drop way more, please stop making things up. I am only wishing for a rare defensive option for spectres that in no way increases my damage directly outside of an armour with STR and a niche build for str be slightly more common in delve, And actually not SPECIFICALLY this armour but the Minion node in delve itself. I could much more likely farm a Headhunter in less time and less headache than i could Obtain and Craft one of these rare spectre armours for much less of a benefit to my build in any regard. Innocence forgives you Last edited by SilentSymphony#3358 on Aug 11, 2019, 1:44:04 AM
|
![]() |
" wtf? i just quoted 4 times... of many. " also, IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU'RE TALKING SOLO OR GROUP, SELF-FOUND WAS THE POINT. ...it's as if i EXPLICITLY went over all this, or something. oh, wait. i did. in NUMEROUS posts, including my previous post. that you quoted. but, hilariously enough, are not ACTUALLY responding to. " ...it's YOUR premise. " ...and i literally never said you did. please actually read the post you're (not actually) responding to. " omg, now you're pretending that +1 spectre doesn't increase damage?! good god, man. [Removed by Support] "Your forum signature was removed as it was considered to be inappropriate and a breach of our Code of Conduct." ...it was quotes. from the forum. lolz! Last edited by robmafia#7456 on Aug 11, 2019, 1:44:36 AM
|
![]() |
" " I guess i'll say this again, Not once in this thread was i referring to Solo-Self-Found outside of correcting you when you say that i was. " " " ^ not my words there. " If i already have 4 spectres on a vis mortis and i switch to this rare body armour for defensive purposes, and again still have 4 spectres where is this additional damage you are speaking of outside of a niche baron build? Innocence forgives you
|
![]() |
" wtf? AGAIN, IT'S YOUR ARGUMENT. i even quoted you saying it 4 times... and why do you keep trying to play semantics? it doesn't matter if you said "ssf" or merely repeatedly described ssf. THE POINT WAS SELF-FOUND. IE: YOUR SELF-IMPOSED RESTRICTION ON TRADING. IE: HOW THE GAME IS EXPLICITLY NOT BALANCED. IE: HOW THE GAME IS EXPLICITLY NEVER GOING TO BE BALANCED. your ENTIRE argument was based on YOU being unable to "find" or "farm" one - as if you can't just trade for one, easily. as if hundreds aren't on poe.trade. " 1. AGAIN, i literally never claimed you said it. 2. you quoted the word "IMPLIES" twice. do you seriously not know what it means? it's as if i applied your exact argument and conditions to build-enabling unique chestpieces, or something. oh... wait, that's EXACTLY what i did. and AGAIN, i never accused you of saying it. I SAID IT. that was... THE POINT. " 1. you JUST claimed it doesn't increase your damage (it does) 2. you were supposed to be arguing it's not power creep/OP (it is) " le sigh. [Removed by Support] "Your forum signature was removed as it was considered to be inappropriate and a breach of our Code of Conduct." ...it was quotes. from the forum. lolz! Last edited by robmafia#7456 on Aug 11, 2019, 2:22:02 AM
|
![]() |
" " It actually does matter, I did not reference SSF, I did not say at any point i was unwilling to buy some of these bases, I said quite clearly that i wished for it to be slightly more common so that a Team of people or even a Solo player could stand a realistic chance of finding one if they were to put forth a significant effort to do so. " " What does ^that say? " This is a question^ not a statement, If you don't care to answer it that is up to you i guess. " ^ " That has never been a part of my argument, If i had referenced another unique which i have it was that said unique is more powerful and significantly easier to obtain than said spectre body armour mod. Innocence forgives you
|
![]() |
omg.
so you're backpedaling away from the self-found aspect of your argument? that leaves... no argument, at all. you now have nothing. no point, at all... as there are literally HUNDREDS of these chestpieces available for trade. just trade for one, already. as for uniques - for the third and final time: i LITERALLY NEVER claimed you said that. i never said you argued that. i used your +1 spectre rare argument and applied it to build-enabling uniques. BECAUSE LOGIC. BECAUSE IT'S THE SAME THING. it was your SAME premise. " it said "FIND." FIND was STILL the keyword. as per SELF-FOUND. ie: self-imposed trade restriction. ie: THE ENTIRE ARGUMENT BETWEEN US. also, i ALREADY QUOTED THAT. also, i ALREADY mentioned group self-found. and party self-found. AGAIN, the key component was... you focusing entirely on "found." you JUST claimed to not be resorting to semantics, btw. " this refutes your entire stated position, thus far. your ENTIRE argument was based on rarity and not FINDING (dropping) one. as per the numerous quotes of yours. that i highlighted in pink. " denial. followed by contradiction and admission in the same paragraph. also, i already quoted you referencing it 4 times. and they were just the 4 most recent up to that point. ffs. poe 2019 - argue for ~8 pages that it should be more common based on solo/group players not being able to find one... then denies/backpedals, leaving no argument, at all. while... still arguing and denying direct quotes. [Removed by Support] "Your forum signature was removed as it was considered to be inappropriate and a breach of our Code of Conduct." ...it was quotes. from the forum. lolz! Last edited by robmafia#7456 on Aug 11, 2019, 3:49:05 AM
|
![]() |
" To backpedal away from it, It would require Solo-Self-Found was ever a part of my argument, It has not and shall not ever no matter how many times you say it be a part of or have been a part of my argument. " " ^This has nothing to do with what I'm saying, I really am failing to see where you got this from, Perhaps you have confused my post with someone else's. " " never said solo-self-found, solo was required in my post as due to the nature of this game grouping is not always possible, I primarily run with a group of people who help each other achieve goals. " Well now we're actually getting somewhere here, Correct I'm only here to ask GGG to slightly reduce the rarity, not make it so common that the vis mortis loses all value, If you have seen those hundreds of bases you keep mentioning how many of them are actual significant upgrades? Well i just ran a quick search, The vis mortis has a top end of 397 energy shield + more through several methods to increase quality available in the game presently. The highest ES base available right now only has 240ES, In order to even get close to surpassing the vis mortis you are required to anull and heavily craft on these items to even come close if you can without losing the mod in the first place through annuls. " Care to answer this? It's not a very complicated question. Innocence forgives you
|
![]() |
" oh. you were serious. you're seriously asking me to answer your moved goalpost? it's... a moved goalpost. and a moved goalpost as a result of your repeated backpedaling from your own claims. you tried to argue it's not more powerful than vis by making it about offense, as if defense/stats/etc isn't power. then you backpedaled from vis mortis, entirely, and asked how +1 spectres provides increased damage. then you tried to cherrypick from the above in bizarre combinations. kind of like how you argued for ~8 pages about "find" and "found," while magically backpedaling to trade. as if there weren't hundreds of non-unique +1 spectre chestpieces available for trade, this entire time. " ...i said the same thing for this entire argument. you clearly realized your argument was btfo and tried to backpedal from it. [Removed by Support] "Your forum signature was removed as it was considered to be inappropriate and a breach of our Code of Conduct." ...it was quotes. from the forum. lolz! Last edited by robmafia#7456 on Aug 11, 2019, 4:06:09 AM
|
![]() |
" ^ the actual post " ^your edit of the actual post " ^your reply. So I'll ask again, How does it add damage when i have 4 spectres with the vis mortis and then upon switching to the rare body armour still only have 4 spectres while also losing the 15% minion damage of the vis mortis. Innocence forgives you Last edited by SilentSymphony#3358 on Aug 11, 2019, 4:14:21 AM
|
![]() |