Ziggy D's New Explaination Proves Synthesis Isn't That Complicated

"

I_NO wrote:

Dude they can make it as complex as they want just make the rewards show for it it's that simple like connect puzzle who gives a shit. People wanna be rewarded with the effort like right now it isn't that's the point and apparently OP and a few people don't get that.

You think a 20 sequence block is better rewards then lets say one single uber lab? No absolutely not. You think you're going to get some sick ass loot from the previews when they showed you from that trailer? You expect it right? No of course not that shit is very VERY hard to make which is another problem there's no middle ground for that only the top tier people can do that.

Which is a not a bad thing in my book seeing my elitist half likes that but for many people else that's horrible with that being said other then the chances of possibly crafting a god tier item there's nothing to show for it. Nobody gives a flying fuck about extra mobs they don't even drop maps dude in terms of memories.

You want to be rewarded
Make it complex sure
Slow down the game all you want

But god dammit make it worth while.

"

kreca73 wrote:

it's statistically proven that people who can delay immediate gratification have the most success in life(i.r.l.).

"

A 2011 brain imaging study of a sample from the original Stanford participants when they reached mid-life showed key differences between those with high delay times and those with low delay times in two areas: the prefrontal cortex (more active in high delayers) and the ventral striatum, (more active in low delayers) when they were trying to control their responses to alluring temptations.[10][11]

"

Reinhart wrote:

In follow-up studies, Mischel found unexpected correlations between the results of the marshmallow test and the success of the children many years later.

A second follow-up study, in 1990, showed that the ability to delay gratification also correlated with higher SAT scores.[5]

...

CORRELATION DOESNOT IMPLY CAUSATION.

In layman terms: these "studies" didnt prove a thing.


Also correlation isnot rotationally invariant, making it a badly defined parameter actually.

A 2012 study at the University of Rochester (with a smaller N= 28) altered the experiment by dividing children into two groups


I hope they did some non-parametric testing here with such a low sample size.

Watts, Duncan and Quan's 2018 conceptual replication[18] yielded mostly statistically insignificant correlations with behavioral problems but a significant correlation with achievement tests at age 15.

When I read such a sentence I can already expect the worst. Arbitrary cut-off p-values have been used (yikes). And no (Bonferroni) corrections were applied.

But then again I have seen worse things happen this week. Retarded engineers overfitting models and acting if R² is the holy grail.
When actual industrial data arrives, their entire model crumbled. And retarded not because their model crumbled but because they were so clueless why their model crumbled. Engineer = physicist with no critical thinking and trained like a robot to do some math but they have no clue what they are doing really.

"

Ironsolid wrote:

I think there's a major part of this mechanic you're not understanding.

You only need 1 ilvl 86 if you're after an ilvl 86 mod. If you're not, then get a single 84 and have spend less. The other pieces of gear ilvl do not matter

"

BearCares wrote:

Basically you 'buy' access to better synthesis outcomes by accumulating stats on the gear that you enter into the device. Do you know what that is similiar too? The Junction System from Final Fantasy 8. Which is like a 20 year old game.