for everyone who wants a challange

"

So I was like hum ?!?!?! What if the first death was free but the death penalty start to kick in on consecutive death within x amount of time (5 min for example) which would prevent death rushing stuff

"

robmafia wrote:

"

SisterBlister wrote:

No, I don't like how you keep calling everybody who argues for a less punishing penalty to be silly casuals who just want a no-brainer game.

please cite where i called people "silly casuals."

you won't. you can't. it never happened. you're lying (again), already.

"

SisterBlister wrote:

You're like one of those raving SJWs who comes to a discussion on a topic they don't like with a megaphone and shouts everybody down.
And no, I did not ask for you to be censored, I asked for you to either participate constructively or shut up.

...sentence 1 is a denial, sentence 2 is an affirmation.

also, please explain how i 'shout everybody down' on a forum. again, you won't.

for added irony, you continue to insist that i'm not participating constructively.

you keep lying and providing zero examples and (obviously) zero facts.

in the post you're quoting, i mentioned just a couple things i contributed.

those lone contributions (and i gave much more in this thread) already are greater than everything you contributed to this entire thread.

facts > opinions. especially when the opinions are just baseless accusations and lies.

"

SisterBlister wrote:

This is normal behaviour for an adult facing an annoying person.

is a habitual liar "an annoying person?" just curious.

"

SisterBlister wrote:

Censorship means that some authority with power actually stops you posting, and I have not asked for that.

this is also a lie.

authority is not a requirement. also, you JUST told/asked me to "shut up." twice. so... another lie. a twofer. congrats, i guess?

"

SisterBlister wrote:

Oh, and finally: You haven't posted a single relevant fact in this thread yet. You've just posted your opinion. Learn the difference between the two.

woooooooooooooow.

right off the top of my head:

fact: the xp penalty was 15%
fact: the xp penalty was already nerfed
fact: this was already covered
fact: i posted links about this same subject in this thread
fact: if the xp penalty was removed, the only remaining variable is playtime/xp gain, resulting in max level being inevitable, given enough playtime
fact: your above claim is yet another lie.



you know, off the top of my head

"

SisterBlister wrote:

OK, I worded that badly. You would prefer a harsher penalty, and that is also a valid opinion. It doesn't change the fact that you've made it known really clearly that you dislike the opinion that the penalty should be less harsh. Nitpicker.

...you start off by admitting error, but then end the paragraph blaming me. and how is it nitpicky? your claim wasn't just COMPLETELY wrong, it wasn't even close.

"

SisterBlister wrote:

"

robmafia wrote:

it's insulting to imply i'm silencing others and/or keeping anyone from posting in this public thread on this public forum and it's outright hypocritical to imply such while wanting me to be censored.

No, you're not silencing anybody, you're just "shouting them down". And as stated above, no one called for censorship.

...you called for censorship.

"

SisterBlister wrote:

Oh, why did I answer? Arguing with you is so pointless. I'll stop until you post something sensible and on topic that one can reply to. hand

yes, arguing a bunch of lies in the face of logic/facts is generally pointless. no idea how you seem to think this is my fault, though...

"

robmafia wrote:

"

So I was like hum ?!?!?! What if the first death was free but the death penalty start to kick in on consecutive death within x amount of time (5 min for example) which would prevent death rushing stuff

aaaaaaand now we're back to incremental zerging.

"

ffogell wrote:

"

robmafia wrote:

"

So I was like hum ?!?!?! What if the first death was free but the death penalty start to kick in on consecutive death within x amount of time (5 min for example) which would prevent death rushing stuff

aaaaaaand now we're back to incremental zerging.

You could make the boss regen when you are not in the arena, would fix that.

"

coyd wrote:

@SisterBlister: You seem to be missing the point here. Because ppl here are mostly complaining about DP or its form which basically means they DO CARE about the XP. And you say you do not care about it at all...

"

Johny_Snow wrote:

The mental gymnastics are real. Please, don't punish me if I make a mistake, please.

"

robmafia wrote:

in terms of a boss kill, sure.

in terms of xp gain, no.

"

ghoulavenger wrote:

@Fruz There are other ways to make content risky, a couple are already in game. The first and most common is in the form of amount of portals available, which makes mapping by its very nature risky -- dying once is okay, but not six times so that beautiful cast on death build, won't clear a map. Another is opportunity cost, usually in the form of RNG gated items, like uber atziri sets and high tiered maps, which means risking a significant investment not only to death but to drops as well. Not enough? Well I never said get rid of the death penalty but I wouldn't mind if it were reduced.

"

Fruz wrote:

If removed, there would be no risk anymore pretty much ( for maybe what ... 99% of the content maybe ? )

"

ffogell wrote:

So with a solution like that you would at least be encouraged to try something at least once and be punished if you try death rush it or you wait the 5 minute needed for the next attempt and retry it.