Key gambling makes me so much poorer.

"

StDrakeX wrote:

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

And you're using it as an performance indicator?

Oh god there's more...

You need dictionary to check up the meaning?

If you couldn't find it in the dictionary for "typo" or "performance indicator" maybe you could try google it?

I used 1 key with corrupting tempest, dropped me a +1 maxres kaoms an eternal, +1 gems perf rolled 6link shavs and an added dmg vinktars as well as a 21/20 item quantity, guess you just don't have the skills to play this game correctly.

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

Nope, you are referring to the grammar, not the English language as proven by the fact that you quoted my phrase , "And FYI, people do not need to write in perfect grammar" and later proceeding to say that "they should , though, if they criticise others' use of the English language".

This suggested that you are saying that people should write in perfect grammar if they criticise others' use of the English language when in fact it is not even a requirement in the internet era.

I already said that this is correct. To rephrase it:
"YoursTruly86, you [insert most insulting thing you can think of], dammit, bloody well at least use correct grammar if you don't find it beneath you to point out linguistic mistakes in other peoples' posts!"
You know, glass houses and stones and suchlike.

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

Stop it man, stop giving excuses like you used to do every now and then in the past.

What, only now and then?

I feel that if people don't understand what and why I wrote something, I need to explain it to them.

"

Mikrotherion wrote:

I already said that this is correct. To rephrase it:
"YoursTruly86, you [insert most insulting thing you can think of], dammit, bloody well at least use correct grammar if you don't find it beneath you to point out linguistic mistakes in other peoples' posts!"
You know, glass houses and stones and suchlike.

This suggested that you are saying that people should write in perfect grammar if they criticise others' use of the English language when in fact it is not even a requirement in the internet era.

You have serious trouble understanding that phrase in bold?

AND FYI ppl are lazy and that's why keywords and word abbreviation exists. Who mandates that people have to write perfect grammar? And who the f cares about grammar when we have keywords and word abbreviations to convey messages.

"

Mikrotherion wrote:

What, only now and then?

I feel that if people don't understand what and why I wrote something, I need to explain it to them.

LMAO you don't even know what is an idiom? Now and then means occasionally fyi.

Seriously, I pity you.

And people talk big when they have nothing credible to back it up, worse they even use the wrong examples or no examples to illustrate it.

Actually, they don't even know what they are writing to begin with and that is why you see them writing rubbish.

What a joke.

Well, you are the one who frequently misunderstood other people's sentences meaning and also used the wrong wordings because "English is not my first language" in your many apology sentences from the past. And yet, you are the one who who tried to be an "English Teacher" trying so hard to educate other people's usage of the English Language. Oh my oh my I MISSED those "apology sentences" from you.

I wish i could dug those sentences one by one out if i have the time.

"

krenderke wrote:

I used 1 key with corrupting tempest, dropped me a +1 maxres kaoms an eternal, +1 gems perf rolled 6link shavs and an added dmg vinktars as well as a 21/20 item quantity, guess you just don't have the skills to play this game correctly.

cool story.

"

Mikrotherion wrote:

"

StDrakeX wrote:

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

sentences's

Nothing wrong with the genitve here.

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

...even if a sentences's grammar is wrong, people can still get the meaning or understand it.

Although it would probably more commonly be "Even if the grammar of a sentence is wrong...".

NAh, both could be used so quit trying to act smart

Your all having isshoes iit.

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

"

Mikrotherion wrote:

I already said that this is correct. To rephrase it:
"YoursTruly86, you [insert most insulting thing you can think of], dammit, bloody well at least use correct grammar if you don't find it beneath you to point out linguistic mistakes in other peoples' posts!"
You know, glass houses and stones and suchlike.

This suggested that you are saying that people should write in perfect grammar if they criticise others' use of the English language when in fact it is not even a requirement in the internet era.

You have serious trouble understanding that phrase in bold?

Not at all, although I think you wanted to make the "w" bold as well - if not, I do have trouble understanding "hen in fact it is not even a requirement in the internet era.". But you saying that it is not a requirement doesn't necessarily make it right, now, does it? Moreover, I never said it was a requirement. I expressed {b]my[/b] opinion that people who criticise other people for mistakes concerning language, they should employ proper language themselves if they don't want to come over as a complete twerp. Since language is a combination of (at least) words and grammar, this includes grammar.
Now, does this mean that I am right because it is my opinion? Of course not. In fact, there is no right and wrong here. I'm sure, however, that quite a lot of people would say that it's not your place to criticise someone else's use of language when you yourself are not perfect (or at least very good) at it.

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

"

Mikrotherion wrote:

What, only now and then?

I feel that if people don't understand what and why I wrote something, I need to explain it to them.

LMAO you don't even know what is an idiom? Now and then means occasionally fyi.

Seriously, I pity you.

I do know what an idiom is. I also know what "now and then" means (and if I didn't, there's dict.leo.org, merriam-webster.com and others, but thanks for taking the time to explain it to me). I was just surprised that you chose "now and then" instead of "frequently", "always", "constantly" or other hyperbole.

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

"

Mikrotherion wrote:

Nothing wrong with the genitve here.

"

YoursTruly86 wrote:

...even if a sentences's grammar is wrong, people can still get the meaning or understand it.

Although it would probably more commonly be "Even if the grammar of a sentence is wrong...".

NAh, both could be used so quit trying to act smart

Which part of "nothing wrong" did you not understand?