Key gambling makes me so much poorer.

WTB insult = 120c
"
Prime_nairB wrote:
WTB insult = 120c


Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
"
Mikrotherion wrote:

Nothing wrong with the genitve here.
"
YoursTruly86 wrote:
...even if a sentences's grammar is wrong, people can still get the meaning or understand it.

Although it would probably more commonly be "Even if the grammar of a sentence is wrong...".

"
Mikrotherion wrote:

Which part of "nothing wrong" did you not understand?


LOl I don't know you were that bad but you went as far as to change the meaning of the entire sentence to your advantage and how low can you get?

He intentionally censored the phrase/word "sentences's" to make it look as if the phrase "Nothing wrong with the genitve here." is connected with the phrase , "Although it would probably more commonly be "Even if the grammar of a sentence is wrong...". when in fact the phrase , "Nothing wrong with the genitve here." is referring to the word/phrase ,"sentences's".

And even if that's not the case like what you have claimed, is there a need to rephrase my sentences?

Are you trying to teach people English? OMG give me a break are you even qualified?

Just LOL.

Honesty is hard to find nowadays
Last edited by YoursTruly86#4027 on Apr 4, 2017, 7:42:48 AM
"
Mikrotherion wrote:


Not at all, although I think you wanted to make the "w" bold as well - if not, I do have trouble understanding "hen in fact it is not even a requirement in the internet era.". But you saying that it is not a requirement doesn't necessarily make it right, now, does it? Moreover, I never said it was a requirement. I expressed {b]my[/b] opinion that people who criticise other people for mistakes concerning language, they should employ proper language themselves if they don't want to come over as a complete twerp. Since language is a combination of (at least) words and grammar, this includes grammar.
Now, does this mean that I am right because it is my opinion? Of course not. In fact, there is no right and wrong here. I'm sure, however, that quite a lot of people would say that it's not your place to criticise someone else's use of language when you yourself are not perfect (or at least very good) at it.



LOL that was a bait. I knew you would say that because arguing MINOR mistakes is what you do best instead of focusing on the important stuff. And btw, was the spelling grossly misspelt to the point that it becomes unrecognizable? It was just a linking word and do people actually look out for linking words to grasp the entire meaning of the sentences? LMAO they look for keywords. And if that missing letter "w" for the word "when" was so important to the point that you do not understand the meaning of the entire sentence, I think English isn't for you.

I do what I want and wrote what I want and that includes using improper grammar and so YOU DO NOT NEED TO IMPOSE YOUR WILL ON OTHERS to follow your style of writing.

And you really don't know what is keywords and word abbreviations do you? Words and spellings supersedes grammar in case you do not know anything about word abbreviation or keywords.


"
Mikrotherion wrote:


I do know what an idiom is. I also know what "now and then" means (and if I didn't, there's dict.leo.org, merriam-webster.com and others, but thanks for taking the time to explain it to me). I was just surprised that you chose "now and then" instead of "frequently", "always", "constantly" or other hyperbole.


Sorry you do not know the meaning of the idiom, "Now and then". If you have known, you would not have replied in such a way to my message.

Maybe if you just stop lying and admit it to avoid further embarrassment.

"
Mikrotherion wrote:


What, only now and then?
Last edited by YoursTruly86#4027 on Apr 4, 2017, 7:45:49 AM
Hey everyone,

Due to the continued derailment of the thread and personal attacks towards other players, I have now locked this thread.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info