Banned for multi clients with manual clicking not botting

"

BacktoHell wrote:

Good riddance.

Go find your next game to exploit. You won't be missed.

Might wanna check that attitude at the door...of the diablo forums you came from..

"

The_Reporter wrote:

It's weird how accounts don't show as 'BANNED' anymore. And weird that people can now continue to post after being banned.

Must be another change of policies?

Doh the level of intelligence... Get banned, make new account, post about it!

"

HypnoticBob wrote:

The responses in this thread are ridiculous. I almost feel like people are yelling, "burn the witch!". Unless proven explicitly, if one is capable (to any degree) of multiboxing while NOT botting, let them have at it. One can call this "cheating" all they want, but simply because one is unable to fathom or perform multiboxing is one's own personal problem and lack of ability. However, there is an idealistic argument and there is the practical/pragmatic argument. If a public policy is in place, be wary, obviously. Furthermore, until I am convinced with a proper argument for the abolition of non-bot multiboxing, I will continue to advocate a change in policy.

Multiboxing is extrmely simple and doesnt require abilities. to play it without bot or automated macroes is slow and unefficient, the only exception is the boss farming.

with 6 multi box including a decent mf cast on death char, you can oneshot bosses and get billions of loot (party *6), it becomes an abuse of the party system. therefore only one copy of the game is allowed.

with two clients you get the MF cast on death that kills bosses easy + a good map cleaner char, and a bit of extra loot with two chars in the party but not the full party bonus. It makes a big difference.

And as you can see, multiboxing is quite the fukin cheat: you can use a cast on death char and not care at all.

Soo since this is a violation of EULA i assume it should be between OP and support and not community's court right ?

I would remove those threads they just end in a shitstorm of hateful comments as always i'm not sure it's necessary.

"

Shagsbeard wrote:

You likely got a temp-ban while they investigate. Don't panic.

Ya till they see him openly admitting he was using 6 instances.... nothing to worry about at all.

"

_Tiem wrote:

"

Shagsbeard wrote:

You likely got a temp-ban while they investigate. Don't panic.

Ya till they see him openly admitting he was using 6 instances.... nothing to worry about at all.

IIRC nowhere in ToU they define term "computer", at least in meaning "physical computer". It can easily be read as "VM".

"

lagwin1980 wrote:

"

Saltychipmunk wrote:

so, the op used a third party application that controls his other account and he is shocked he got banned?

lol?

No he used an application to run more than 2 game instances on the same PC, something that has always been bannable.

Well day 1 on 64 bit client you could run 32 AND 64 in 2 windows without any tricks...
It's not bannable on the same pc actually, vmware etc is allowed. They will look into it, and if they see i puts are different, then he will get unbanned, no worries.

"Have a nice day" - chris wilson

lol what's up guys

"

Manocean wrote:

lol what's up guys

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!

"

Manocean wrote:

lol what's up guys

Peace,

-Boem-