Donald Trump

"

SkyCore wrote:

Iv never in my life seen such a outpouring of sadistic and childish messages from the winners of anything. I think that this behavior speaks volumes about trumps campaign. And it gives legitimacy to the opposition.

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

"

SkyCore wrote:

Iv never in my life seen such a outpouring of sadistic and childish messages from the winners of anything. I think that this behavior speaks volumes about trumps campaign. And it gives legitimacy to the opposition.

Question: What's more childish than requiring play-dough and coloring books to cope with losing an election?

Are you telling me these people don't deserve to be mocked? Should we coddle their personal sensitivities instead?

"

SkyCore wrote:

That you think people who oppose trump 'require play-dough' is very telling of your mental capabilities. Now shhh, and let the grown ups talk.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

To add onto my previous post: There are two main philosophies for combating bigotry.

1. Fighting fire with fire, fighting bigotry with bigotry. This is the current strategy of politically correct, social justice warrior culture, created by liberal academic and promoted through mainstream media. It focuses on past and future problems and points out white privilege, male privilege, etc to create an anti-white, anti-male narrative. It encourages cucks in the same way old-school racism encouraged Uncle Toms. It needs opposing bigotry to justify itself, and thus exaggerates the power and pervasiveness of such in the culture. It labels the superficial, unavoidable ignorance between cultures as "micro-aggression" and takes it seriously - but only when expressed by the persecuted group. It answers any real divides in culture by allowing people to choose which form of bigotry they prefer: misogyny or misandry, racist against whites or against blacks, etc.

2. Fighting fire with water, fighting bigotry on principle. This is currently a mostly underground strategy, persecuted against in public and spread mostly through meme culture. It's about a colorblind future with past sins forgiven; it mocks those backwards and hypocritical enough to attribute guilt to white people because of the racism of their ancestors. It doesn't need opposing bigotry to justify itself, and is confident enough in its distance from real bigotry to joke about it. Most importantly, it's the path to true non-racist culture, using humor to alleviate the superficial, unavoidable ignorance between groups while encouraging a true coming together.

Spoiler

"

SkyCore wrote:

Iv never in my life seen such a outpouring of sadistic and childish messages from the winners of anything. I think that this behavior speaks volumes about trumps campaign. And it gives legitimacy to the opposition.

"

diablofdb wrote:

Awwhhhhhh poor thing

"

SkyCore wrote:

Now shhh, and let the grown ups talk.

"

DalaiLama wrote:

While I certainly don't advocate it, some have taken a third approach. It's too far IMO, but I guess the protests are causing more divide than I thought, and they've literally started hanging liberals in some towns:

Spoiler