Donald Trump

good! means bigots who love stirring up trouble just for the sake of stirring up trouble get what they deserve.

actually, i apologise. that's not fair to the bigots who are trying to send a message, of which is probably "fuck your safe spaces and pc culture KEK LEL CUCKS". in which case, that's cute! but sorry, that opinion is in the minority there, and if you can take a clue, it means gtfo :)

Ah! Grubhub, Pepsi, and apparently you have so quickly forgotten the first principle of famous economist Michael Jordan:

the only difference is that the shoes they buy don't have any soles, just like themselves

"

Juicebox360 wrote:

the only difference is that the shoes they buy don't have any soles, just like themselves

Au contraire mon Pepé, we have the best souls making souls here in America:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCr9U7Goa8Y

"

innervation wrote:

Not mine, stole it from reddit - and I might have to take back encouraging that:

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/799402064212279296

Apparently if you live in a liberal city, your friendly neighborhood SJW barista(s) will call the cops on you -_-

Hilarious. Barista "I'm calling the cops". Customer: "uh...ok? Go ahead?"

Kek, you can see the sheer butthurt in his face. Noice.

Obama furiously trying to jam in a lot of his personal agenda before leaving, but other DC leadership is going to say "not so fast"...
ttp://thefederalistpapers.org/us/boom-gop-issues-warning-to-obama

"

Juicebox360 wrote:

good! means bigots who love stirring up trouble just for the sake of stirring up trouble get what they deserve.

actually, i apologise. that's not fair to the bigots who are trying to send a message, of which is probably "fuck your safe spaces and pc culture KEK LEL CUCKS". in which case, that's cute! but sorry, that opinion is in the minority there, and if you can take a clue, it means gtfo :)

Bold mine. I think this post is interesting because I've been trying to figure out how to describe the Alt-Right in a concise manner, and you did a pretty good job. In part, because in a way you got to the heart of what political correctness really is: the bigotry of cucks. "Oh, you're not ashamed to be a straight white male? Well, we're just going to have to SJW you to death." Liberals created the equivalent of the KKK, identical in ideology but inversed in polarity, and spread it throughout the left, enforcing minority privilege wherever it goes by terrorizing straight white males. I don't kek though, not too much anyway, because at least when it comes to the youth I know you're right about that "majority" thing.

"

Juicebox360 wrote:

trump voters may not be racist themselves but they sure lent a hand towards validating a campaign that drew the bigots out of the woodwork of american society.

I see you threw in the liberal media's keyword "bigot". Also on that list would be "racist", "tolerance", and "hatemonger".

Bigot: "a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions."

Bigot does not mean racist, as much as the media would like you to associate the two. By the very definition of word "bigot", EVERYONE on PoE forums are bigots, aside from a select few, because they hold on strongly to their opinions and are generally not tolerant of other opinions, to the point of arguments and personal attacks.

So, if you want to say that with the appropriate definition of "bigot", then yes, I agree, Trump supporters are very firm in their opinions about politics and not tolerant of liberal politics. But if you want to say this in terms of the media's definition of "bigot" and associate it with racism, then no, you're completely wrong.

The actual number of Americans who would purposefully believe and act upon prejudice towards someone of another nationality, religion, or skin color is a very slim number compared to the population as whole. The media has played that story quite differently, to the point of labeling everyone in the US who doesn't adopt liberal agendas and ideals as "bigots" or "racists". It's a sad tactic that has successfully shot down political discussion over certain issues.

"

Juicebox360 wrote:

but by the same token, americans supporting hillary were complicit towards a malfunctioning establishment, tainted with corruption and abuse.

Complicit? That would indicate that they made the choice knowing about the corruption and abuse. I think the majority of liberals voting for Hillary were more often voting because it's their party, or voting because they've been mislead (ie: brainwashed) by the liberal media, which has deflected much of the lies and corruption the world discovered about Hillary and the DNC.

"

Juicebox360 wrote:

we have to ask ourselves which is easier to extricate. once we have racist, sexist, homophobic people with significant clout empowered by a president, is it easier to kick them out versus reworking a system that clearly hasn't been working optimally for the past few decades?

As explained earlier, you're buying into liberal propaganda.

Example:

Liberal media: Black Teen Murdered by White Cop

Conservative media: Police Fatally Shoot Violent Black Teen

Truth: A teenager was shot by a police officer when he resisted arrest in a violent confrontation when teenager charged police with what looked like a gun in his hand. Police thought suspect had weapons, but teenager was unarmed.

Liberal media would try to re-ignite a race war, conservative media would try to protect the officer, and truth is police make a mistake and used deadly force because they thought the suspect was capable of using deadly force.

Think outside the media and do your own research and you'll see how each side is trying to brainwash you.

"

Juicebox360 wrote:

personally, i would've preferred having the candidate that didn't have the hate train backing them, but i'm obviously biased.

shitty times we live in. what i'd give to have been born in the 2030s instead of the 1990s.

Only "shitty" because you believe all of the political attacks in the media. Your fault alone, no one else's fault.

To add onto my previous post: There are two main philosophies for combating bigotry.

1. Fighting fire with fire, fighting bigotry with bigotry. This is the current strategy of politically correct, social justice warrior culture, created by liberal academic and promoted through mainstream media. It focuses on past and future problems and points out white privilege, male privilege, etc to create an anti-white, anti-male narrative. It encourages cucks in the same way old-school racism encouraged Uncle Toms. It needs opposing bigotry to justify itself, and thus exaggerates the power and pervasiveness of such in the culture. It labels the superficial, unavoidable ignorance between cultures as "micro-aggression" and takes it seriously - but only when expressed by the persecuted group. It answers any real divides in culture by allowing people to choose which form of bigotry they prefer: misogyny or misandry, racist against whites or against blacks, etc.

2. Fighting fire with water, fighting bigotry on principle. This is currently a mostly underground strategy, persecuted against in public and spread mostly through meme culture. It's about a colorblind future with past sins forgiven; it mocks those backwards and hypocritical enough to attribute guilt to white people because of the racism of their ancestors. It doesn't need opposing bigotry to justify itself, and is confident enough in its distance from real bigotry to joke about it. Most importantly, it's the path to true non-racist culture, using humor to alleviate the superficial, unavoidable ignorance between groups while encouraging a true coming together.

You know what is great about Trump being elected? just reading the torrents of cries from SJW all over internet.