Donald Trump

The fucking madman, he did it.

Trump is losing the popular vote and I'm loving it. It'll only amplify the salt.

Let s see if he will be better than G.W Bush lol

You guys think the establishment was hard on him before you have seen nothing yet.. Donald will be attacked and feed misinformation non stop by the Deep State https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0525428348?tag=randohouseinc11578-20 and they might even impeach him if he tries to go to far away from thier rent seeking with endless wars, security surveillance state, govt contracts of all sorts and legislation they want. GL Donald with Make America Great, President Obama came in on Hope and Change too and quickly turned into business as usual. If you read that book the president is a puppet or made one in short order.

"

Aim_Deep wrote:

You guys think the establishment was hard on him before you have seen nothing yet.. Donald will be attacked and feed misinformation non stop by the Deep State https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0525428348?tag=randohouseinc11578-20 and they might even impeach him if he tries to go to far away from thier rent seeking with endless wars, security surveillance state, govt contracts of all sorts and legislation they want. GL Donald with Make America Great, President Obama came in on Hope and Change too and quickly turned into business as usual.

That's pretty much what I'm expecting too. IMO the hopeful ones are way too optimistic and the doomsayers are simply misguided and misinformed.

I just realized something

"

Bars wrote:

"

Aim_Deep wrote:

You guys think the establishment was hard on him before you have seen nothing yet.. Donald will be attacked and feed misinformation non stop by the Deep State https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0525428348?tag=randohouseinc11578-20 and they might even impeach him if he tries to go to far away from thier rent seeking with endless wars, security surveillance state, govt contracts of all sorts and legislation they want. GL Donald with Make America Great, President Obama came in on Hope and Change too and quickly turned into business as usual.

That's pretty much what I'm expecting too. IMO the hopeful ones are way too optimistic and the doomsayers are simply misguided and misinformed.

Exactly will be business as usual with minor tweeks. We have a system of oligarchy centered are international banks and corp rent seekers that contains how much presidents can go rouge. Like they could fuck his presidency real good just raise interest rates 2% and crash economy for middle class who would call for his head. Not to mention attack him as before with The Republican Establishment, "think tanks" and media surrogates.

He's not getting jobs back, hes not building a wall. He may lay off overthrowing yemen, syria, ukraine etc a bit.

hey guys let forget about fighting/debating each other.

look at those butthurt celebrity twitter comments who had supported Hillary earlier, and how everyone else's comment below that page.

Nice Read indeed, I have a lot of good laugh. LMAO. :D

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3918926/Hollywood-starts-panic-results-aren-t-going-Clinton-s-way.html

"

Bars wrote:

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

1. Accept that you've been part of a massive disinformation campaign organized by the mainstream media. Whether or not this disinformation was deliberate or negligent is irrelevant; false information is not practical. These are the folks who told you not only that Hillary would win, but that it would be a landslide. They told you not to look at Wikileaks. They told you Comey was a villain, then a hero, then a villain again, then a hero again. They've told you not to look at Wikileaks and Project Veritas even though their contents have led to firings and resignations. They've told you lots of other things, too. You should doubt all of it. Stop placing your blind trust in an industry wise primary source of revenue is advertising.

That's a good point. As an outsider, I find it baffling that more people aren't asking a simple question: Why did most so-called 'studies' name Hillary as the favorite when Trump actually won with a healthy margin?

I believe its a combination of being deluded, clueless and manipulative.

Ppl said Sanders was unelectable, truth is he probably would have won that election against Trump. Some of the people saying that were clueless and following the 'meta', everyones saying it, must be true. But theres another group who knew he would probably have an easier time winning it than Hillary, but they wanted Hillary and believed she could win, so they said it knowing it was lie in order to try and make him unelectable. Youre wasting a vote on this guy he has no chance, it sintentional undermining. I believe theres also a group who were democrats that would rather have lost to Trump than won with Sanders.

We have an issue like this with the leader of our Labour party here in the UK. Hes called Jeremy Corbin, probably at one point the most popular, electable politician we have had in my life time. What are the establishment saying? Hes unelectable, not viable, its foolish to vote for him or think he could ever run the country. Now its not just the opposition saying that, people in his own party are saying that. They know he could win an election, and the truth is they would rather lose the election than win with him because he actually stands for real Labour policies, he stands for working class people, he stands for our country, not just the middle class businessmen of London. They are completely sold out to business and the banks, theres Labour vs Conservatives, but the truth is that those divisions dont mean what they once did, both those parties stand for Londoncentic big business at the expense of working class and lower middle class people who no longer have a party. They have been frozen out of politics. The political system, pundits and all, is united in trying to make sure that no one goes against the banks and big business that fund them. So both parties have consistently undermined him, lied and said hes no electable, and the media have follow suit, some realise its a lie but repeat it because they also have that goal and some think its true and are just repeating what everyone else is saying because thats all they are, repeaters of the word around town. The more they repeat it the less electable Corbin becomes, they might be able to get him kicked out before an election actually happens and if he makes it there they may be able to paint a false picture so thoroughly that it has become a true picture.


The establishment over there, to me it seemed like there was a priority line. first and foremost Sanders was not to be allowed, he was the most electable and that could not be allowed because america like the uk is run for and by big money at the expense of the mass of people and he was not playing that corrupt game. Once hes out of the picture its Trump vs Hillary and Trump was the one they didnt want. There were democrats who would rather lose to Trump than win with Sanders because Trump will still protect the rich on a lot of issues and that is their real allegiance, but Trump is still an individual, not a complete robot blank canvas for the establishment like Hillary, he still has his own agenda that cant be bought so once sanders is out of the picture then Trump is the next head on the chopping block. Again, his own party turning on him, a lot of that was real because hes a ridiculous, vulgar individual with some views that go against typical republican views, but some of that also fueled by the fact he is not 'playing the game', hes not business as usual, he cant be trusted to just let the machine keep rolling unhindered like Hillary would have.


the mainstream media is fake, its a hatchet man for the same corrupt machine the mainstream yesmen politicians are. Its playing the game to keep the mass of people in their countries disenfranchised, unrepresented and clueless. A few in the media know this and work to those ends but a lot of them dont, they are simply jobsworth idiots, similarly clueless people who got into their positions for exactly that reason, because they just repeat what they are told with no experience, no real understanding, when you do that you do not rock the boat and you get to keep hanging around. Wheres the real journalists like John Pilger? They barely exist now days, what you get instead on your tv is autocue readers, they know nothing about the world, investigate nothing, they just read a script scrolling in front of them and their only talent is reading the script well and making you feel confident they speak with some kind of authority, occasionally pulling in the opinion of someone whos just going to repeat the establishment line.


Brexit was possibly a stupid move, Trump was possibly a stupid move, they got through because people are a bit stupid but also because its the only option on the table. People on mass may be fairly clueless but they know enough to know something is not right, that they are not being represented, and voting for these things is the only way they have of voting against the establishment that they know is certainly wrong. We have a generation running the establishment atm that has grown up their whole lives in a situation where the establishment has total control, their arrogance and complacency that this is an inevitable thing has now come back to bite them, people are growing resistant to the games they play, often in a semi subconscious fashion but its enough to reject their status quo. I believe this is what we are seeing, its a rejection of the establishment, not an embracing of anything in particular.

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

People have this attitude like the USA is expected by everybody else to "contain" the Russians. Maybe Europe should increase their military budgets so they can afford to defend themselves? Honestly as an American, I'm tired of my tax money going to defend your countries.

Russia is no direct threat to europe, it doesnt need to defend itself against russia by having bombs to drop on russia. If russia and Europe got into a fight then both entities would be destroyed beyond all recognition, we would bomb each other back into the dark ages within a matter of days. Its in no ones interest, both sides would lose, no one would win, that is guaranteed. No major powers would ever get into a war with each other given modern technology.

The talk about defending from russia is scaretalk in order to increase military spending so that you have a bunch of bombs to drop on 3rd world countries that cant really fight back in order to control natural resources to protect your own economy and western political weight.

I think were moving towards a global government, russia, china, europe, america, we can never actually directly fight each other ever again because the fight would completely destroy all of us, by fighting we would be guaranteed to lose everything we are fighting for, to wage war is to lose the war. What I think the game is now days, at some point in the future we are going to sit around a table and negotiate a proper world government, its all about these big entities that have a place at that table doing what they can to get to that table in as strong a position as possible, to have as many bargaining chips as they can manipulate between now and then. Russia is sitting there looking at America, legitimized by the Uk, bombing and killing, starting wars and mass manipulating in the middle east towards that goal. They know whats going on and they make some of their own moves on samll countries around them, stick their fingers into places in the middle east to try and claw back a little power. but ultimately they know they can never compete, its just a game to make sure they dont fall too much further behind at this stage.

The population of europe still knows what war feels like, they have no stomach to slaughter virtually defenseless developing nations full of goat farmers. America does not have the same level of these issues and theyre playing the global strategy game big time, number 1 aggressor by a long long way. It has to remain that way because americas economy needs the jobs created by the war machine, and they need an excuse like russia because they cant come out and admit the truth. Europe wants you to keep doing it because they would rather you were in the driving seat of a world government than russia or china, but they dont have the same stomach for slaughter and they dont actually need to directly defend themselves from anyone so theyre not going to match americas military spending. They just need enough military spending to defend their interests, which is a different thing. The uk likes generating industry from war too, so we have a similar economic dependency on endless war on a much smaller scale. A country like germany actually has proper industry, they dont need to make bombs to make jobs and no one who matters would ever be insane enough to start a war with them ever again. Why would they need to go crazy on building excessive amounts of war machines? Theyre making as much as they need to.

Congrats fellow Trump supporters! :-)

My "take-aways"...

1.) The left was so utterly delusional that they are still in shock. I bet in their minds this part of reality isn't happening. Wonder how long it will take to sink in for them?

2.) Hillary's campaign is stunned and hence she couldn't give a concession speech. They probably were so overconfident they forgot to write one for her.

3.) CNN had a poll on how a Trump presidency made them "feel". I'm not kidding you. Like 30-some percent said their were scared. LOL. The left loves "feelings" since they can't handle the truth.

4.) CNN and MSNBC criticizing Trump for making a unifying acceptance speech, instead of one that reflected Trumps' drain-the-swamp sentiments. Did they expect to see fire and brimstone or something? Again, left hypocritical and truly brainwashed by the rest of the media and the liberal administration that purposely tries to divide the nation.

5.) When it was 258 or so for Trump and 218 for Clinton on Fox, CNN had it at 244 and 215 respectively. Even the liberal media forecasting of CNN was grasping on to that last imaginary straw of hope in midst of their blindness.