Donald Trump

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

"

Jennik wrote:

.........

...I wasn't responding to your first sentence. By process of elimination, only the second remains.

Everyone else is delusional. Everyone else is down the rabbit hole. Everyone else is not worth replying to. Everyone else's perspective is invalid. Everyone else needs to come back to reality. Everyone else is grabbing their pitchfork and clutching their pearls over the most trivial of manufactured controversies...

Pattern Recognition.

Okay, DL, you're rubber and I'm glue. Got it.

You know we're not in preschool, right? Here in adult-world, people usually at least pretend to make a rational argument instead of saying "nuh-uh, you are!" Okay, not really, but it'd sure be swell if they did. Unplug that head and give it a shot. If you claim I'm wrong when I say those things, demonstrate how I'm wrong instead of acting like you're five years old.

Edit: Fuck, I know better than to bother with you. You have demonstrated time and time again that you literally can't stop being who you are. Don't bother responding. I went ahead and made a second list to always keep on.

You guys still feeding him?

couldnt be more obvious if he had it written in his signature.
learn to spot lost causes, he's "rational"
The irony in some of his posts is so strong, if he was an object he'd be a projector

"

Disrupted wrote:

You guys still feeding him?

couldnt be more obvious if he had it written in his signature.

Your lack of self-awareness is astounding.

Scrotes, we disagree on quite a few issues, but look at the people you've aligned yourself with. You really have to scrape the bottom of the bad basket to reach these guys. That doesn't necessarily mean you're wrong, but it should at the very least give you pause.

When the literal worst America has to offer is cheering for Trump, ask yourself if maybe there's a reason. It's not too late to realign yourself and go down on the right side of history.

I don't think I have anything further to add to the thread at this point, and dealing with Trump worshipers is fucking brutal. I'll bow out now.

People, remember to practice healthy skepticism. Education is not the enemy. Always try to be better tomorrow than you are today. Most of the people reading this are not lost causes, but you'll still have to work hard to find your way back to reality. It's worth it. Fight.

"

Jennik wrote:

Okay, DL, you're rubber and I'm glue. Got it.

You know we're not in preschool, right? Here in adult-world, people usually at least pretend to make a rational argument instead of saying "nuh-uh, you are!" Okay, not really, but it'd sure be swell if they did. Unplug that head and give it a shot. If you claim I'm wrong when I say those things, demonstrate how I'm wrong instead of acting like you're five years old.

Edit: Fuck, I know better than to bother with you. You have demonstrated time and time again that you literally can't stop being who you are. Don't bother responding. I went ahead and made a second list to always keep on.

Character assassination is more effective than rational arguments. Just saying...

You don't need fact to believe in Flying Spaghetti Monster.

"

Jennik wrote:

Scrotes, we disagree on quite a few issues, but look at the people you've aligned yourself with. You really have to scrape the bottom of the bad basket to reach these guys. That doesn't necessarily mean you're wrong, but it should at the very least give you pause.

It has. I've somewhat masochistically forced myself to watch some Alex Jones lately. Holy fuck is that guy despicable.

Fuck, I think I'll even do some Hillary defending for a change of pace. She has it bad enough with the real things she's done wrong.

So here's an Alex Jones brand report: Wikileaks Bombshell: Hillary Camp Calls Young People "F**KING Dumb"

The source document - which again, is DKIM-verified as being genuine - can be found here. I'll quote the relevant portion (BS = Bernie Sanders).

"

BS has made his campaign/movement symbiotic with a pop culture trend. HRC needs this kind of infusion to pull younger voters. And she may not be the best face of it so so maybe it's trending figures to advocate for her b/c that's the crap that young people pay attention to. I hate to generalize a generation but by social media nature, they "follow". So if someone they identify as cool endorses - they will likely fall in line with that candidate.

(Don't forget Bill had "don't stop" campaign song, that was a pop culture play and had his Saxophone moments. It's fucking dumb but being "cool" counts for more than it maybe should)

So okay, it is a little condescending towards the younger generation... but the context for "fucking dumb" is clearly Bill Clinton's saxophone playing and/or being "cool" counting for more than it should. I personally would agree with either premise and find neither sightly controversial.

Hillary herself wasn't involved in the email, of course. It's between staff.

The thing which is truly amazing though, is that the entire section I quoted is displayed briefly during the Infowars video. It's as if they know their audience will swallow everything to such an extent that the pause button is beyond their capability. I mean, I personally DKIM'd the email just to be thorough, as I'd do with pretty much any Wikileaks email I hear referenced in any media, but in this instance the contradiction is fully fucking internal. That made this clip stand out from the usual garbage.

Then the end of the video is telling its viewers "you can research information for yourself from multiple sources or you can blindly accept what you read or hear in the mainstream media, never questioning what you're being told." Holy fucking hypocrisy, Batman. Clearly these guys are no better or worse, selling the novelty of critical thinking without the actual thinking part.

And this is the guy who O'Keefe is getting all buddy-buddy with. Not a good look. Definitely makes me worry about that whole "selective editing" thing.

Point being, I think I found where Ray gets his news.

However, I still stand in conviction, based on actually researching shit, that HRC is a thoroughly corrupt serial liar who will be a convicted criminal soon enough. Filter through all the garbage the alt-right media churns out (and holy fuck is there a lot of it) and that's the conclusion supported by the evidence.

"

Jennik wrote:

I don't think I have anything further to add to the thread

what dude? but you were going so strong

Who else will guard the fields?

"

Jennik wrote:

Scrotes, we disagree on quite a few issues, but look at the people you've aligned yourself with.

I wouldn't say that Scrotie has aligned himself with anyone, but his own informed opinions and usually well considered posts.

I was wrong on this one -correcting the info in the post.

Considering that the Attorney General Loretta Lynch has just plead the fifth <---BZZZZT (BAD INFORMATION -Corrected after seeing Scro ) [edit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3885328/Loretta-Lynch-pleads-fifth-avoid-answering-questions-1-7bn-payments-Iran.html b][edit] [/b]<---Going to have to add this news source to the group that is known to shoot from the hip too soon. b][edit] [/b]

How much longer before the current POTUS has to plead the fifth as well?

So when is the best time to tune in?
7th-8th CET ?
The vote counting starts when?

"

DalaiLama wrote:

Considering that the Attorney General Loretta Lynch has just plead the fifth, your chosen candidate is keeping some rarified company.

I already wrote this over at Alex Jones, I'll just c+p it here:

TRUTH RATING: FALSE
Ms. Lynch has not invoked her Fifth Amendment rights (this time). Senators Rubio and Pompeo wrote a letter to Ms. Lynch demanding that she answer questions regarding their inquiry into the Iran deal, during which they used the phrase "essentially pleading the fifth" as a figure of speech. Link to their letter: http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/28OCT16-Letter-to-DoJ-re-Initial-Iran-Payment-Letter.pdf

Additionally, there's a pretty epic Trey Gowdy speech where he denies the validity of a previous instance of Ms. Lynch attempting to invoke the Fifth Amendment.

TL;DR: No she hasn't, Rubio and Pompeo were being asshats, but it'd behoove Ms. Lynch to answer their questions.