Donald Trump

Just an interesting, unrelated bit of personal trivia. I've been using the forum ignore script for a while. I actually had to disable it for the Trump and Hillary threads because almost every single Trump supporter was already on my ignore list due to being a blight on humanity.

I have to say, that definitely didn't improve my perception of Trump supporters. These Trump fans aren't necessarily indicative of Trump supporters at large, but he really did lock down the internet troll demographic early on. We're clearly not sending Trump our best. Some, I assume, are good people.

Also, for anyone interested, the Bush administration lied to Americans about intelligence reports of WMDs. That is not remotely the same thing as actual intelligence agencies actually coming out and saying Russia is behind these attacks on America. You can't stop conspiracy freaks from believing ridiculous conspiracies, though.

"

Congress eventually concluded that the Bush administration had "overstated" its dire warnings about the Iraqi threat, and that the administration's claims about Iraq's WMD program were "not supported by the underlying intelligence reporting."

That doesn't mean anything Jennik. If anything that proves my point. The point that intelligence agencies can be used as a tool for a political agenda. That underscores the reason why they shouldn't be exempt from burden of proof.

And ironically, many liberals came over and voted for the Iraq war along with Bush based on the same "intelligence". They share in the lies and warmongering.

Also, which intelligence agencies, and in which countries are making the claims that the Russian government hacked the emails? I haven't even heard a clear picture of exactly who is making these claims. I'm hearing it from the mouths of political hacks looking to play damage control for Clinton. If you can't even name these intelligence agencies, then that makes their claims appear even more laughable.

Ok, how about this. 11 intelligence agencies agree that Hillary Clinton is a reptilian. Proof? It's classified. Who? Again, that's classified. You're a conspiracy nutter for not believing me.

This congressional inquiry is just career politicians looking to save face after voting for a massively unpopular war. So they can go back to their "anti-war" stances, lmao. Yeah, I'm massively cynical when it comes to this government. A lot of people are.

Look, I don't know if Trump is going to keep his word or not. But one thing I know is we haven't had anyone quite like Trump running for president before. And if there is even a small chance he's 100% serious then it can only mean good things. At worst he'd be no worse than Clinton could be.

If you can find a way to spoof the DKIM process used to verify the Podesta emails are genuine, there's about $600 in it for you. Sorry, they're real.

From what I can tell, the main agency claiming Podesta was hacked by Russians — specifically, hacked by the group identified as "Fancy Bear" — is the private security firm SecureWorks, based in Atlanta. SecureWorks' case appears solid, although it's more clear that this group is Russian (language used, hours of day during which they're active) than linked to the Russian government (probable, but speculative — they are using some computing tools known to be used by Russian government, although how they acquired these tools is a mystery). It's also worth noting that the previous DNC hack which provided Wikileaks with emails was by independent Eastern European hacker Guccifer 2.0, who seems to be more of a Wikileaks true believer that any kind of espionage agent. Regardless of their loyalties, Fancy Bear likely is feeding Wikileaks due to the precedent established by Guccifer 2.0.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

If you can find a way to spoof the DKIM process used to verify the Podesta emails are genuine, there's about $600 in it for you. Sorry, they're real.

I never claimed the emails aren't real, nor did I in any way insinuate this. I said they don't contain anything of relevance.

"

Jennik wrote:

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

If you can find a way to spoof the DKIM process used to verify the Podesta emails are genuine, there's about $600 in it for you. Sorry, they're real.

I never claimed the emails aren't real, nor did I in any way insinuate this. I said they don't contain anything of relevance.

...

You cannot be serious.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

"

Jennik wrote:

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

If you can find a way to spoof the DKIM process used to verify the Podesta emails are genuine, there's about $600 in it for you. Sorry, they're real.

I never claimed the emails aren't real, nor did I in any way insinuate this. I said they don't contain anything of relevance.

...

You cannot be serious.

I understand that you live a life of delusion, but you can easily rectify that in this case when you're completely unable to find a quote of me making that claim. I've said this many times and I'll say it once again - things are not true simply because you believe they're true.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

You cannot be serious.

Looks like Miss "goody goody olive branch" (acting like the diplomatic one, when in reality she's gaslighting) stuck her foot in her mouth yet again. Can't make this stuff up. "Nothing of relevance", lmao!

People can go to this website below and decide if there is "nothing of relevance" for themselves.

http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

"

Jennik wrote:

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

"

Jennik wrote:

I never claimed the emails aren't real, nor did I in any way insinuate this. I said they don't contain anything of relevance.

...

You cannot be serious.

I understand that you live a life of delusion, but you can easily rectify that in this case when you're completely unable to find a quote of me making that claim. I've said this many times and I'll say it once again - things are not true simply because you believe they're true.

I wasn't responding to your first sentence. By process of elimination, only the second remains.

Trump just added rallies to Michigan and New Mexico. He must be quite confident.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

I wasn't responding to your first sentence. By process of elimination, only the second remains.

Not everybody grabs their pitchfork or clutches their pearls over the most trivial of manufactured controversies. Even the one big revelation I still see non-Trumpers talking about isn't relevant to me. I don't eat risotto, so I'd never use Podesta's recipe.

Also, Xavvie, Trump's quite confident that he can drum up some more interest in Trump TV. Every time he yells "the election's rigged!" and orders his followers to go watch those dirty "riggers" in inner cities on election day, you're looking at a precursor to the November 9th bitch-fest. He's been paving the road to his obvious loss with whining and excuses for weeks.

I know Trump says the polls are all rigged (except the ones where he's ahead since he's a fucking idiot in addition to being a whining baby), but all of reality is not a conspiracy against him. All of the polls are not fake. All of those black people aren't in the crowds in his rallies for a reason (minus Trump's "thug," and Jesus Christ Trump is a pathetic, racist piece of shit). Most women really don't want to vote for such a blatantly misogynistic prick. Most adults with an education and enough rationality to not buy into conspiracy theories really do recognize the unique danger Trump represents to America. These people really aren't going to vote for Trump.

Daddy Trump, God Emperor of centipedes, will fall on election day. The world (minus Russia, of course), will rejoice.