Donald Trump
" To be fair, nobody's actually saying that now. Anyone who honestly believes Hillary wanted to drone Assange is so far down the rabbit hole they'd view the Queen of Hearts as a font of wisdom. I'm also concerned as to how KBoo got the Hillary drone idiocy so tangled up in his head that he now believes that tons of people want Assange droned. KBoo, nobody wants to drone Assange. Put down the Kool-Aid. It's not too late to take a step back toward reality. You might not be able to make it all the way back to us, but Jesus Christ, at least give it a try. Wikileaks is clearly shit, though. They're releasing anti-Hillary information hacked by the Russian government on a specific schedule with the intent of stopping Hillary from being elected president. They are refusing to release the information they have that would be harmful to Trump. Anyone who doesn't recognize just how fucked up Wikileaks has become is drowning in a sea of delusion. |
![]() |
Yes, it's a conspiracy by the Russians to get Trump elected. LMAO. That's a really failed attempt at damage control. Like instead of trying to defend or deny the content in the leaked emails they resort to this:
![]() Last edited by MrSmiley21#1051 on Oct 29, 2016, 6:00:56 PM
|
![]() |
Eh. She still asked about droning him. I personally think she was joking; the context fits for a joke borne in frustration, rather than any real intent. But it's an odd joke to make.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
|
![]() |
According to Clinton supporters, the content of the emails doesn't matter because the Russians allegedly hacked them. Sorry, but normal people aren't gonna accept that. The average person actually cares that they're being lied to.
|
![]() |
When Hillary says it, it's a joke. When Trump says it, it's literally Hitler.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
![]() |
Any emails with merit are responded to. Almost all of them are completely banal, though. This is especially true regarding the recent emails, of which the biggest bombshell has been Podesta's recipe. There's a reason the media isn't doing wall to wall coverage of the emails this time around, and it's not any conspiracy. It's because they're not worth discussing.
Keep in mind that nothing in the emails changes the facts regarding Russia. You do not know better than over a dozen US intelligence agencies. Russia is acting against America and you are blindly denying this because of your Donald worship and Hillary hatred. Stop denying reality. Stop getting your "news" from Alex Jones, Breitbart, LastTruthBastionObamasAMuslim.tv, and r/the_donald. You're living in a bubble surrounded by idiocy and reality-denial. Escape the bubble before it rots your brain any further. |
![]() |
Surely some of you Trump supporters have to recognize just how ridiculous the other Trump supporters are, right? I understand that POE, being a video game, has a much higher percentage of uneducated white males than the populace at large. Some of you can see the level of idiocy your fellow Trumpties are spouting, though, right? I have to hope you're not all that far gone.
When Hillary makes a joke, it's treated as a joke. When Trump says something that's not a joke, it's not treated as a joke. I understand that everything seems like rocket science to you, Xavvie, but this is not rocket science. Stop letting the simplest aspects of reality confuse you. |
![]() |
They also haven't been forthcoming with their supposed evidence that the Russians hacked them. They're implicating the Russian government directly when they're making claims without the evidence to back it up. Seems to me like they're just playing damage control for Clinton.
Just take a look at this campaign ad: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxZPe0Ftuok Trump basically compared Putin to ISIS. Makes no bones about him being an "opponent". And here is a response from the Kremlin about it: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3497272/Kremlin-slams-Trump-campaign-video-described-Vladimir-Putin-America-s-toughest-opponent-demonization-Russia.html Yet the Russians are somehow conspiring to get Trump elected. The narrative seems to be that Trump is somehow a puppet of Putin, because the Russian government allegedly hacked those emails (unproven), and because Trump isn't ready to fight WW3 with the Russians over Syria and Ukraine (common sense). Ironically, Trump is very critical of the Iran deal, a deal that Clinton and Obama agreed on that the Russians very much approve of. Yet Trump is the Russian puppet. Does this underscore how laughable these accusations are? Last edited by MrSmiley21#1051 on Oct 29, 2016, 6:37:22 PM
|
![]() |
" So you believe this is all a conspiracy by the US government? Over a dozen US intelligence agencies, along with however many of their employees would have to be involved, are lying to Americans in order to trick us into believing the Russians are behind this? "US intelligence agencies won't release all of their (almost certainly classified) information, so I deny it exists." Jesus Christ, man. We're done. You don't deserve the words I've wasted on you. |
![]() |
The burden of proof lay with the ones making the claims. Just because they're an "Intelligence agency" doesn't make them exempt from the same burden of proof that anyone else is expected to provide when making such claims.
Which intelligence agencies? Which countries? And perhaps they can come together to put forward SOMETHING representing factual evidence. If you think Obama isn't looking to use the entire resources of the US government to play damage control for Clinton this election, then you're really naive. From the flip side, how many intelligence agencies claimed there were "WMDs" in Iraq? Intelligence agencies don't exactly have a great track record of being correct, or even "intelligent" for that matter. They certainly don't meet a standard high enough to be exempt from "burden of proof". Also, Jennik's attempts at gaslighting are freaking hilarious. Last edited by MrSmiley21#1051 on Oct 29, 2016, 6:50:45 PM
|
![]() |