Pointless argument about chance and randomness

"

Fruz wrote:

this is a forum, and I'm arguing ...
YOU GOT ME THERE !
nice thing checking historic of people to make an argument btw, you familiar with politic lol ?

I think you have proven your point to everyone here .... or not. But I don't think continuing doing so ( or trying ) will change anything about what people ( the one that had the courage to read some of this ) think about is actually.

I'm just gonna *grab popcorn* and give a look to this thread sometimes to have free facepalms from now on I guess.

Forum is not mainly used to argue... fail after fail.
I did prove my point unlike you who proved nothing tbh. Continuing what? What did you do lol?

"

Deccode wrote:

Ignorant? You are stubborn beyond cure. Your stupidity hurts me.

You are the one who is proven wrong over and over again but refuses to accept it.

You even failed so hard in your last post that you had to run away from the argument. "The chances are not shown in the first picture it's just 3 of different possible outcomes." HAHA lol, you can't even understand an extremely simple picture.
You were wrong, it's clear as day to everyone here, why do you bother to keep this up?
If you actually had a point to make then you wouldn't need to fill your posts with insults.

http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/104496/page/1#p1072331

I knew I saw this argument somewhere in this forum before.

SPOILER ALERT!

Mark_GGG posted in it too.

END SPOILER ALERT!

"

BisnessPirate wrote:

http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/104496/page/1#p1072331

I knew I saw this argument somewhere in this forum before.

SPOILER ALERT!

Mark_GGG posted in it too.

END SPOILER ALERT!

"

Mark_GGG wrote:

Random does not mean that all outcomes are equally likely, just that the outcome is not predictable.
The orb of chance is random, but the possible results are not equally likely, which is an entirely different property from randomness.

Good find.

I wonder if Deccode will just silently sneak away in shame or if he will come back with even more insults and ignorance.

"

Sickness wrote:

Good find.

I wonder if Deccode will just silently sneak away in shame or if he will come back with even more insults and ignorance.

Don't even start. Come on. It's good enough to know that you are factually correct. Let the dude base his own opinion and stand by it if he wishes.

"

mibuwolf wrote:

"

Sickness wrote:

Good find.

I wonder if Deccode will just silently sneak away in shame or if he will come back with even more insults and ignorance.

Don't even start. Come on. It's good enough to know that you are factually correct. Let the dude base his own opinion and stand by it if he wishes.

It must be true since a GGG said it lol. Fuck my prof. for telling lies right... fast thinking brains all over the internet. You people fall under the "if you take away 5% of 1 dollar and later add 5% of the new value to the new value it's 1 dollar again" people. Or the ones who doesn't understand the monty hall problem. Problem here is that you claim that a manipulated event is still random. While this even doesn't need any arguments or proofs or whatever you jumped onto mibuwolfs side and made your own argument loose and be forgotten but bring up his/her argument. That's so ridiculous you surrendered long time ago buddy. Randomness must have equal chances for all outcome nobody here questioned predicable outcomes why do you bring this even up?

"

Deccode wrote:

It must be true since a GGG said it lol. Fuck my prof. for telling lies right... fast thinking brains all over the internet. You people fall under the "if you take away 5% of 1 dollar and later add 5% of the new value to the new value it's 1 dollar again" people. Or the ones who doesn't understand the monty hall problem. Problem here is that you claim that a manipulated event is still random. While this even doesn't need any arguments or proofs or whatever you jumped onto mibuwolfs side and made your own argument loose and be forgotten but bring up his/her argument. That's so ridiculous you surrendered long time ago buddy.

You fall under the "the earth is flat" people.
You ignore everything you are presented with and stick to your belief no matter what.

This is indeed ridiculous. Your position is undefensible, because it's so blantantly wrong. You have yet to present a single coherent argument or evidence to support it.
All you do is tell other people that they are wrong and throw insults with your eyes and ears closed when you are contradicted.

You are a truly ignorant person, and this has been fun.

"

Deccode wrote:

Randomness must have equal chances for all outcome

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MRmxfLuNto

I also dont think that having a 75% chance of getting a magic item, 22% of getting a rare and 3% of getting an unique is "random". Thats just bullshit. Not that I disagree with that concept, the wording is just plain wrong.

"

Sickness wrote:

"

Deccode wrote:

It must be true since a GGG said it lol. Fuck my prof. for telling lies right... fast thinking brains all over the internet. You people fall under the "if you take away 5% of 1 dollar and later add 5% of the new value to the new value it's 1 dollar again" people. Or the ones who doesn't understand the monty hall problem. Problem here is that you claim that a manipulated event is still random. While this even doesn't need any arguments or proofs or whatever you jumped onto mibuwolfs side and made your own argument loose and be forgotten but bring up his/her argument. That's so ridiculous you surrendered long time ago buddy.

You fall under the "the earth is flat" people.
You ignore everything you are presented with and stick to your belief no matter what.

This is indeed ridiculous. Your position is undefensible, because it's so blantantly wrong. You have yet to present a single coherent argument or evidence to support it.
All you do is tell other people that they are wrong and throw insults with your eyes and ears closed when you are contradicted.

You are a truly ignorant person, and this has been fun.

"

Deccode wrote:

Randomness must have equal chances for all outcome

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MRmxfLuNto

Lol what I throw links at you which you don't even understand. It's like I post a link you ignore it, you post a link we discuss it. Now I ignore thinks... you are like throwing shit at yourself. Whatever you say is 100% correct for yourself.

"

drzpicu wrote:

I also dont think that having a 75% chance of getting a magic item, 22% of getting a rare and 3% of getting an unique is "random". Thats just bullshit. Not that I disagree with that concept, the wording is just plain wrong.

This is orb of fusing not orb of chance topic. Sorry but I have to agree with the other topic where orb of chance has a correct wording. It's not named Orb of Randomness after all.